NCT02663817

Brief Summary

The hypotheses of the study are as follows:

  • Mass-based inverse optimization in radiotherapy treatment planning will result in a reduction of normal tissue and organs at risk (OAR) doses for desired prescription therapeutic doses to the targets.
  • Dose-mass histograms (DMHs) may be more relevant to radiotherapy treatment planning and treatment plan assessment than the standard of care, realized through dose-volume histograms (DVHs)

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable head-and-neck-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable head-and-neck-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 19, 2015

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 19, 2016

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 26, 2016

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 4, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 4, 2019

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 5, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

January 19, 2016

Results QC Date

December 16, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 21, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percent Change in Radiation Dose to Healthy Human Tissue.

    The study is computational in nature. A new treatment planning paradigm is proposed, where from the newly proposed treatment plans, and the treatment plans generated with the standard of care, radiation doses to different organs and tissues would be derived. Radiotherapy toxicity (to healthy human tissue) is proportional to radiation dose - more radiation dose results in higher toxicity. Thereby, if radiation dose is decreased, the toxicity would also be decreased. The dosimetric differences which the investigators observe between the standard of care and their novel optimization approach are reported as percent change with respect to the standard of care.

    Baseline, up to three years.

Study Arms (1)

IMRT

EXPERIMENTAL

Study participants being treated according to the standard of care with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Several CT scans will be performed for each enrolled subject: one before the radiotherapy course for patient treatment planning purposes (as part of the standard of care), one during the radiotherapy treatment course (between fraction 10 and 20), and one at follow up visit or at least 6 weeks post-radiotherapy treatment (whichever comes first).

Device: CT Scan

Interventions

CT ScanDEVICE
Also known as: Computed Tomography Imaging Scan
IMRT

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients must have histologically confirmed head-and-neck, lung, or prostate tumors.
  • Patients who will be treated with radiation therapy or concurrent chemoradiation therapy.
  • Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) or resection cavity must be visible on CT such that it can be delineated as a target for radiotherapy.
  • Patients who are able to understand the investigational nature of this study and agree to sign a written informed consent document.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant or nursing women will not participate. Women of reproductive potential must be offered a pre-treatment pregnancy test and informed of the need to practice an effective contraceptive method during the therapy.
  • Patients younger than 18 years.
  • Patients whose size and weight would not allow CT scanning.
  • No vulnerable populations (fetuses, pregnant women, children, prisoners) will be included in this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Miami

Miami, Florida, 33136, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsProstatic Neoplasms

Interventions

Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsRespiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesGenital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisRadiographic Image EnhancementImage EnhancementPhotographyRadiographyTomography, X-RayTomography

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Ivaylo Mihaylov
Organization
University of Miami

Study Officials

  • Ivaylo Mihaylov, PhD

    University of Miami

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2016

First Posted

January 26, 2016

Study Start

June 19, 2015

Primary Completion

April 4, 2019

Study Completion

April 4, 2019

Last Updated

February 5, 2020

Results First Posted

February 5, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations