Prospective European Multicenter Study on Aortic Valve Replacement: (E-AVR Registry)
E-AVR
Outcome Comparison of Different Surgical Strategies for the Management of Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: Study Protocol of a Prospective Multicentre European Registry (E-AVR Registry)
1 other identifier
observational
8,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Traditional and transcatheter surgical treatments of severe aortic valve stenosis (SAVS) are increasing in parallel with the improved life-expectancy. Recent randomized trials (RCTs) reported comparable or non-inferior mortality with transcatheter treatments compared to traditional surgery. However, RCTs have the limitation of being a mirror of the predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria, without reflecting the "real clinical world". Technological improvements have recently allowed the development of minimally invasive surgical accesses and the use of sutureless valves, but their impact on the clinical scenario is difficult to assess because of the monocentric design of published studies and limited sample-size. A prospective multicentre registry including all patients referred for a surgical treatment of SAVS (traditional, through full-sternotomy; minimally-invasive; or transcatheter; with both "sutured" and "sutureless" valves) will provide a "real-world" picture of available results of current surgical options, and will help to clarify the "grey zones" of current guidelines. E-AVR is a prospective observational open registry designed to collect all data from patients admitted for SAVS, with or without coronary artery disease, in 16 cardiac surgery Centres located in six countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, and United Kingdom). Patients will be enrolled over a 2-year period and followed-up for a minimum of 5 years to a maximum of 10 years after enrolment. Outcome definitions are concordant with VARC-2 criteria and established guidelines. Primary outcome is 5-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes aim at establishing "early" 30-day all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as major morbidity, and "late" cardio-vascular mortality, major morbidity, structural and non-structural valve complications, quality of life and echocardiographic results. The study protocol is approved by Local Ethics Committees. Any formal presentation or publication of data will be considered as a joint publication by the participating physician(s) and will follow the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) for authorship.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2029
ExpectedApril 3, 2020
March 1, 2020
2.1 years
April 30, 2017
March 31, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
5-year all-cause mortality
Any death occurring after surgery
The outcome measure will be assessed at 5 years after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (27)
Follow-up all-cause mortality
The outcome measure will be assessed at time point (30 days, and yearly from 1 to 4 years after surgery, then from 6 to 10 years)
Cardiovascular mortality
The outcome measure will be assessed at time point (30 days, 1 year, and yearly up to 10 years after surgery
Stroke
The outcome measure will be assessed at time point (30 days, 1 year, and yearly thereafter up to 10 years after surgery
Acute myocardial infarction
The outcome measure will be assessed at time point (30 days, 1 year, and yearly thereafter up to 10 years after surgery
Prolonged use of inotropes
Participants will be followed up to 72 hours after surgery
- +22 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Quality of Life
The outcome measure will be assessed at time point (before surgery, at discharge, at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and yearly thereafter up to 10 years after surgery
Study Arms (1)
Aortic valve replacement patients
All the patients operated on aortic valve replacement in the study period at all the centers participating in the study
Interventions
All surgical procedures used for both traditional and mini-invasive aortic valve replacement, as well as transcatheter valve implantation.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients referred for a surgical treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis (either traditional - through full-sternotomy - or minimally-invasive, or transcatheter - with both "sutured" and "sutureless" valves), isolated or associated with coronary artery bypass grafting
You may qualify if:
- Age \>18 yy
- Isolated SAVS with or without concomitant aortic valve regurgitation
- Isolated prosthetic aortic dysfunction
- SAVS + coronary artery disease (CAD)
- Prosthetic aortic dysfunction + CAD
- Elective, urgent and emergent procedures
- Endocarditic aetiology
You may not qualify if:
- Patients undergoing concomitant mitral valve surgery, or tricuspid valve surgery, or aortic surgery (i.e. composite aortic valve and ascending aorta replacement with or without circulatory arrest), or atrial fibrillation surgery, or any other associated cardiac surgical procedure (with the exception of CABG)
- Concomitant aortic root procedure (i.e. Bentall operation, David operation, homografts, autografts)
- SAVR with techniques of aortic annular enlargement
- Porcelain aorta
- Pure aortic valve regurgitation
- Percutaneous TAVR requiring surgical cut-down (i.e. failure to comply with a full percutaneous approach, thus configuring a "hybrid procedure")
- Patient refusal
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Parmalead
- University of Genovacollaborator
- University Hospitals, Leicestercollaborator
- University of Hamburg-Eppendorfcollaborator
- San Camillo Hospital, Romecollaborator
- University of Turin, Italycollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besanconcollaborator
- University Hospital, Udine, Italycollaborator
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelonacollaborator
- University of Lausanne Hospitalscollaborator
- Hopital Universitaire Robert-Debrecollaborator
- Paracelsus Medical Universitycollaborator
- University of Campania Luigi Vanvitellicollaborator
- University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallascollaborator
- Clinique Pasteurcollaborator
- Cardiocentro Ticinocollaborator
- Universita di Veronacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Verona
Verona, 37126, Italy
Related Publications (8)
Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, Delahaye F, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Levang OW, Tornos P, Vanoverschelde JL, Vermeer F, Boersma E, Ravaud P, Vahanian A. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J. 2003 Jul;24(13):1231-43. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00201-x.
PMID: 12831818RESULTVahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, Butchart E, Dion R, Filippatos G, Flachskampf F, Hall R, Iung B, Kasprzak J, Nataf P, Tornos P, Torracca L, Wenink A; Task Force on the Management of Valvular Hearth Disease of the European Society of Cardiology; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007 Jan;28(2):230-68. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl428. Epub 2007 Jan 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 17259184RESULTFilsoufi F, Rahmanian PB, Castillo JG, Chikwe J, Silvay G, Adams DH. Excellent early and late outcomes of aortic valve replacement in people aged 80 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Feb;56(2):255-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01535.x. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
PMID: 18047491RESULTGrossi EA, Schwartz CF, Yu PJ, Jorde UP, Crooke GA, Grau JB, Ribakove GH, Baumann FG, Ursumanno P, Culliford AT, Colvin SB, Galloway AC. High-risk aortic valve replacement: are the outcomes as bad as predicted? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jan;85(1):102-6; discussion 107. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.010.
PMID: 18154791RESULTSmith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Williams M, Dewey T, Kapadia S, Babaliaros V, Thourani VH, Corso P, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock SJ; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 9;364(23):2187-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103510. Epub 2011 Jun 5.
PMID: 21639811RESULTLeon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Brown DL, Block PC, Guyton RA, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Douglas PS, Petersen JL, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock S; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1597-607. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008232. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
PMID: 20961243RESULTMack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR, Miller DC, Moses JW, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Douglas PS, Anderson WN, Blackstone EH, Kodali SK, Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Kapadia S, Bavaria J, Hahn RT, Thourani VH, Babaliaros V, Pichard A, Herrmann HC, Brown DL, Williams M, Akin J, Davidson MJ, Svensson LG; PARTNER 1 trial investigators. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2477-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60308-7. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
PMID: 25788234RESULTOnorati F, Gherli R, Mariscalco G, Girdauskas E, Quintana E, Santini F, De Feo M, Sponga S, Tozzi P, Bashir M, Perrotti A, Pappalardo A, Ruggieri VG, Santarpino G, Rinaldi M, Ronaldo S, Nicolini F; E-AVR Collaborators. Outcomes comparison of different surgical strategies for the management of severe aortic valve stenosis: study protocol of a prospective multicentre European registry (E-AVR registry). BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 10;8(2):e018036. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018036.
PMID: 29440154DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Francesco Onorati, MD, PhD
Universita di Verona
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Cardiac Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2017
First Posted
May 8, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2017
Primary Completion
November 30, 2019
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2029
Last Updated
April 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- from November 2019 to October 2029
- Access Criteria
- The overall anonimyzed datset will be shared among the participants during periodical E-AVR Steering Committee meetings. The entire set of statistical analyses derived from all the approved sub-studies will be available to all E-AVR researchers for the interpretation of data.
Data will be collected into a dedicated datasheet with predefined variables. Each patient enrolled in the Registry will be anonymized by the generation of a code consisting of the initials of the enrolling Centre (2 letters), the initial of name (1 letter) and surname (1 letter), and the date of birth (dd.mm.yyyy) (e.g. Mr. John Smith, born on February 18th, 1953; enrolled in London = LOJS18021953). It is responsibility of the E-AVR Steering Committee local member to generate the sequence to maintain anonymized the entire set of data. Storage, analysis and auditing of data will be accomplished by an independent Central Core Laboratory. Auditing of the dataset will be performed every six months by checking the data of a minimum of 40% of the patients. Incomplete or contraddictory data with patient identification code will be sent from Central Core Statistical Lab to the E-AVR Steering Committee local member for further data checking, review, correction and merging.