Evaluating the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Delamanid in Combination With Optimized Multidrug Background Regimen (OBR) for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in Children With MDR-TB With and Without HIV
A Phase I/II Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Delamanid in Combination With Optimized Multidrug Background Regimen (OBR) for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in Children With MDR-TB With and Without HIV
2 other identifiers
interventional
37
3 countries
5
Brief Summary
This Phase I/II study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the anti-tuberculosis (TB) drug delamanid (DLM) in combination with an optimized multidrug background regimen (OBR) for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in children with MDR-TB with and without HIV.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Feb 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_1
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 18, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 29, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 25, 2026
CompletedJune 25, 2026
May 1, 2026
6.2 years
May 1, 2017
April 17, 2026
May 31, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (18)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of ≥ Grade 3 Severity
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). 95% CIconfidence interval (CI) computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured from entry through Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of ≥ Grade 3 Assessed by the Core Team to be at Least Possibly Related to the Study Drug
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured from entry through Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Were Terminated From Study Treatment Due to a Drug-related Adverse Event
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured from entry through Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Absolute Corrected QT Interval by Fridericia (QTcF) ≥ 500 Msec
Evaluation of the Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTcF was performed per protocol. ECGs conducted at these visits were performed in triplicate (if possible). Consultation with the protocol cardiologist was available and encouraged for any abnormal or equivocal ECG findings and/or questions related to cardiac toxicities and assessment. Participants were counted if they had QTcF ≥ 500 msec at any study visit from entry to Week 24. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Entry, weeks 2, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Died Through Week 24
Death due to all causes included. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured from entry through Week 24
Geometric Mean of Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-24h) DLM
PK parameter was determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model The starting population PK model was developed on data from Otsuka study 232 and 233 (1). NONMEM was used when developing the final model for the population in this study. * Developed a population PK model as part of the final PK analysis * Data used in the population PK analysis included the semi-intensive PK visit (week 0, 2 and 8) and sparse PK visits (week 4, 12, 16, 24 and 28).
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Geometric Mean of Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-24h) DM-6705
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model The starting population PK model was developed on data from Otsuka study 232 and 233 (1). NONMEM was used when developing the final model for the population in this study. * Developed a population PK model as part of the final PK analysis * Data used in the population PK analysis included the semi-intensive PK visit (week 0, 2 and 8) and sparse PK visits (week 4, 12, 16, 24 and 28).
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Geometric Mean of Area of Maximal Concentration (Cmax) DLM
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Geometric Mean of Area of Maximal Concentration (Cmax) DM-6705
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Time of Maximal Concentration (Tmax) DLM
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Time of Maximal Concentration (Tmax) DM-6705
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Oral Clearance (Cl/F) DLM
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Oral Clearance (Cl/F) DM-6705
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Volume of Distribution (Vd) DLM
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Volume of Distribution (Vd) DM-6705
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Mean Absorption Time (MAT) DLM
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Terminal Half-life (t1/2) DLM
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Terminal Half-life (t1/2) DM-6705
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events ≥ Grade 3 Severity
Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events ≥ Grade 3 Severity Assessed by the Core Team to be at Least Possibly Related to the Study Drug
Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Percentage of Participants With Absolute Corrected QT Interval by Fridericia (QTcF) ≥ 500 Msec
Screening, Entry, weeks 2, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and week 28
Percentage of Participants Who Died Through Week 72 Post DLM
Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events ≥ Grade 2 Severity
Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Cohort 1 (>=12 to < 18 years)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received delamanid (DLM) twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants also received non-study prescribed OBR for MDR-TB.
Cohort 2 (>=6 to < 12 years)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received delamanid (DLM) twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants also received non-study prescribed OBR for MDR-TB.
Cohort 3 (>=3 to < 6 years)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received delamanid (DLM) twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants also received non-study prescribed OBR for MDR-TB.
Cohort 4 (>=0 to < 3 years)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received delamanid (DLM) twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants also received non-study prescribed OBR for MDR-TB.
Interventions
Administered orally; dosing based on participants' weight. ≥ 40 kg: 100 mg twice daily (adult formulation); 30 to \< 40 kg: 50 mg twice daily (adult formulation); 15 to \< 30 kg: 25 mg twice daily (pediatric formulation); \< 15 kg: 15 mg twice daily (pediatric formulation)
Non-study prescribed OBR varied according to local, national, and/or international guidelines for treatment of children with MDR-TB. Administered in addition to DLM for 24 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Parent (or legal guardian) willing and able to provide written informed consent for child study participation. Additionally, for children whose assent is required per site institutional review board/ethics committee (IRB/EC) policies and procedures, child willing and able to provide written assent for his or her study participation.
- HIV status determined by testing requirements in the protocol (see the protocol for more information on this criterion)
- If living with HIV: Initiated the standard of care antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen at least two weeks prior to enrollment (note: regimens including efavirenz \[EFV\], nevirapine \[NVP\], a boosted protease inhibitor \[PI\], or integrase strand transfer inhibitor \[INSTI\] are allowed)
- Confirmed or probable MDR-TB classified as follows:
- Confirmed MDR-TB (or rifampicin mono-resistant TB \[RMR-TB\], pre-extensively drug-resistant \[XDR\] or XDR-TB):
- \*Intra-thoracic (pulmonary) TB based on chest radiograph consistent with TB, and/or any of the following forms of extrathoracic TB:
- Peripheral TB lymphadenitis
- Pleural effusion or fibrotic pleural lesions
- Stage 1 TB meningitis
- Miliary and abdominal TB
- AND
- Microbiological confirmation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from any clinical specimen by either culture or molecular methods (including Xpert MTB/RIF)
- AND
- \*Drug-resistance demonstrated by genotypic (molecular) or phenotypic methods, with any of the following resistance patterns:
- \*MDR-TB (resistance to both rifampicin and isoniazid (INH))
- +23 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Known allergy to any nitroimidazoles or nitroimidazole derivatives
- Active use of prohibited medications listed in the protocol, within 3 days of enrollment
- Participant has a history of any of the following, as determined by the site investigator or designee based on parent/guardian report and available medical records:
- A significant cardiac arrhythmia that requires medication or a history of heart disease (heart failure, coronary artery disease) that increases the risk for Torsade de Pointes
- Significant gastrointestinal (GI), metabolic, neuropsychiatric, kidney or endocrine disease at screening that would, in the investigator's opinion, preclude safe participation in the trial and/or assessment of primary endpoints
- Previous DLM or pretomanid exposure
- Note: Participants can have received up to 17 days of DLM prior to enrollment
- Abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) (including QTcF \[mean value of QT interval, corrected using Fredericia correction, on ECG performed in triplicate\] greater than or equal to 450 ms, atrioventricular block, or prolonged QRS greater than or equal to 120 ms) at screening. Note: The value from centralized ECG read should be used to determine study eligibility.
- Karnofsky score less than 30% for participants greater than or equal to 16 years of age or Lansky play score less than 30% for participants less than 16 years of age, at screening
- Alcohol intake that in the opinion of the study investigator could potentially interfere with study participation and/or introduce safety concerns with use of DLM
- Lactating with plans to breastfeed, at enrollment
- Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) Stage 2 or 3, or osteo-articular TB at screening
- Co-enrolled in any other trial involving pharmacologic regimens, at screening
- If exposed to HIV and less than 2 years of age: Breastfeeding at enrollment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Medical College (BJMC) CRS
Pune, Maharashtra, 411001, India
Sizwe CRS
Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
PHRU Matlosana CRS
Klerksdorp, North West, 2574, South Africa
Desmond Tutu TB Centre - Stellenbosch University (DTTC-SU) CRS
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7505, South Africa
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC)
Moshi, Tanzania
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- ACTG Clinicaltrials.gov Coordinator
- Organization
- ACTG Network Coordinating Center, Social and Scientific Systems, a DHL Holdings Company
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Anthony Garcia-Prats, MD
University of Wisconsin, Madison
- STUDY CHAIR
Ethel Weld, MD
Johns Hopkins University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2017
First Posted
May 4, 2017
Study Start
February 18, 2019
Primary Completion
April 22, 2025
Study Completion
May 29, 2025
Last Updated
June 25, 2026
Results First Posted
June 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Beginning 3 months following publication and available throughout period of funding of the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trial (IMPAACT) Network by NIH.
- Access Criteria
- * With whom? \* Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use of the data that is approved by the IMPAACT Network. * For what types of analyses? \* To achieve aims in the proposal approved by the IMPAACT Network. * By what mechanism will data be made available? * Researchers may submit a request for access to data using the IMPAACT "Data Request" form at: https://www.impaactnetwork.org/studies/submit-research-proposal Researchers of approved proposals will need to sign an IMPAACT Data Use Agreement before receiving the data.
Individual participant data that underlie results in the publication, after deidentification.