Efficacy and Safety of Primary Teeth Anesthesia Using Nasal Spray in Children
Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Primary Maxillary Second Molars Anesthesia Using Nasal Spray in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
68
1 country
1
Brief Summary
68 healthy children from the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at Damascus University who require treatment for their primary maxillary second molars will be randomly assigned into one of two groups: experimental or control groups. In the experimental group, a lidocaine hydrochloride-epinephrine hydrochloride nasal spray will be applied to anesthetize upper second molar before the commencement of treatment. To assess the efficacy of this kind of anesthesia, a specific scale will be used by an external observer after capturing some video files of the performed treatment. To assess the safety of this procedure, vital signs will be recorded before and after treatment. Acceptance of the nasal spray will be recorded based on the child's behavior before and after treatment using Frankl scale. If anesthesia was not sufficient to proceed with the procedure, a rescue anesthesia would be used. Rescue anesthesia consists of an infiltration injection of lidocain hydrochloride 2% with epinephrine hydrochloride (1:100,000). In the control group, an intra-oral lidocaine-epinephrine injection will be applied due to treatment. Safety, efficacy and acceptance will be assessed in the same manner to what is performed in the experimental group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2017
CompletedJuly 27, 2017
July 1, 2017
1 year
April 14, 2017
July 26, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change in Blood Pressure
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure will be measured.
(1) five minutes before drug administration, (2) after 10 minutes of anesthesia, and (3) at the completion of the dental treatment, an average of 40 minutes.
Change in Oxygen Saturation
Oxygen saturation will be measured using a specific device.
(1) five minutes before drug administration, (2) after 10 minutes of anesthesia, and (3) at the completion of the dental treatment, an average of 40 minutes.
Change in Respiration Rate
Respiration rate will be measured clinically in the conventional manner.
(1) five minutes before drug administration, (2) after 10 minutes of anesthesia, and (3) at the completion of the dental treatment, an average of 40 minutes.
Change in Heart Pulse Rate
Heart pulse rate will be measured clinically in the conventional manner.
(1) five minutes before drug administration, (2) after 10 minutes of anesthesia, and (3) at the completion of the dental treatment, an average of 40 minutes.
Change in FLACC scale
This scale will be used to evaluate efficacy. It will be studied by an external observer at 5 stages; first stage: during administration of the drug, second stage: while probing the gingiva around the tooth "buccally, palatally", third stage: when penetration of the dentino-enamel junction occurs, fourth stage: when exposure of the dental pulp occurs, fifth stage: during the removal of the coronal pulp.
(1) within the first minute of drug administration, (2) when probing the gingiva at approx. Minute 5, (3) when entering the dentin at approx. Minute 10, (4) when exposing the pulp at approx. Minute 15, (5) during the removal of the pulp at Minute 20
Change in Frankl scale
This scale will be used to evaluate children's acceptance and will be measured by an external observer at five assessment times.
(1) within the first minute of drug administration, (2) when probing the gingiva at approx. Minute 5, (3) when entering the dentin at approx. Minute 10, (4) when exposing the pulp at approx. Minute 15, (5) during the removal of the pulp at Minute 20
Study Arms (2)
Nasal Spray of Lidocaine HCL
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive treatment with an application of nasal spray for anesthetization.
Infiltration injection of Lidocaine HCL
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach patient in this group will receive an infiltration injection for anesthetization
Interventions
This spray consists of lidocaine hydrochloride-epinephrine hydrochloride
This is the ordinary method of establishing anesthesia for patients undergoing dental treatment for caries.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy children between 7-10 years.
- With a need for pulpotomy or a restorative dental procedure requiring local anesthesia for a single vital primary maxillary second molar with no evidence of pulpal necrosis.
- Normal lip, nose, eyelid, and cheek sensation.
- No history of allergy for lidocaine-hydrochloride or epinephrine-hydrochloride.
You may not qualify if:
- Frequent bleeding form the nose (≥ 5 per month)
- Inadequately controlled active thyroid disease of any type.
- Having received dental care requiring a local anesthetic within the 24 hours preceding study entry.
- History of allergy to or intolerance of lidocaine or epinephrine.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Peadodontics, University of Damascus Dental School
Damascus, DM20AM18, Syria
Related Publications (6)
Ciancio SG, Hutcheson MC, Ayoub F, Pantera EA Jr, Pantera CT, Garlapo DA, Sobieraj BD, Almubarak SA. Safety and efficacy of a novel nasal spray for maxillary dental anesthesia. J Dent Res. 2013 Jul;92(7 Suppl):43S-8S. doi: 10.1177/0022034513484334. Epub 2013 May 20.
PMID: 23690356BACKGROUNDReed KL, Malamed SF, Fonner AM. Local anesthesia part 2: technical considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012 Fall;59(3):127-36; quiz 137. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.3.127.
PMID: 23050753BACKGROUNDPandey RK, Bahetwar SK, Saksena AK, Chandra G. A comparative evaluation of drops versus atomized administration of intranasal ketamine for the procedural sedation of young uncooperative pediatric dental patients: a prospective crossover trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Fall;36(1):79-84. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.36.1.1774746504g28656.
PMID: 22900449BACKGROUNDHersh EV, Pinto A, Saraghi M, Saleh N, Pulaski L, Gordon SM, Barnes D, Kaplowitz G, Bloom I, Sabti M, Moore PA, Lee S, Meharry M, He DY, Li Y. Double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal K305 (3% tetracaine plus 0.05% oxymetazoline) in anesthetizing maxillary teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Apr;147(4):278-87. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
PMID: 26822100BACKGROUNDKanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2012 Mar;38(3):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.010. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
PMID: 22341059BACKGROUNDKanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth. J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):421-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
PMID: 22414822BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohammad Raslan Alzein, DDS
MSc student, Department of Paedodontics, University of Damascus Dental School
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Shadi Azzawi, DDS MSc PhD
Senior Lecturer in Paedodontics, Department of Paedodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2017
First Posted
May 4, 2017
Study Start
May 15, 2016
Primary Completion
May 15, 2017
Study Completion
June 15, 2017
Last Updated
July 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share