Restrictive Intravenous Fluids Trial in Sepsis
RIFTS
Assessing Targeted Fluid Resuscitation Strategies Among Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
1 other identifier
interventional
113
1 country
1
Brief Summary
IV fluid resuscitation has long been recognized to be an important treatment for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. While under-resuscitation is known to increase morbidity and mortality, contemporary data suggests that overly aggressive fluid resuscitation may also be harmful. Currently, following an initial IVF resuscitation of 30 ml/kg, there is no standard of care and a lack of evidence to support a fluid restrictive or more liberal strategy. The investigators seek to determine if a fluid restrictive strategy reduces morbidity and mortality among patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2018
CompletedAugust 31, 2018
June 1, 2018
11 months
April 10, 2017
August 29, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Discharge Mortality and Persistent Organ Dysfunction (POD) a composite outcome
Persistent Organ Dysfunction is defined as the ongoing need for vasopressor agents such as norepinephrine, epinephrine, vasopressin or dopamine for more than two hours in a given day; persistent renal failure as defined by the need for any ongoing renal replacement therapy; or persistent respiratory failure as defined by the ongoing need for mechanical ventilation at least 2 hours a day. The composite outcome will be defined as having at least one of the 4 possible composite outcomes (death, vasopressor support, persistent renal failure, or persistent respiratory failure). If a patient has one or more of these outcomes they will be classified as having the primary composite outcome. If the patient has 0 of 4 outcomes they will be classified as not having the composite outcome.
At participant hospital discharge or up to 60 days
Secondary Outcomes (9)
7 day Mortality and Persistent Organ Dysfunction
Day 7
30 day Mortality and Persistent Organ Dysfunction
Day 30
60 day Mortality and Persistent Organ Dysfunction
Day 60
Intensive Care Unit length of stay
up to 60 days
Length of Shock
up to 60 days
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants randomized to the usual care resuscitation strategy will receive an initial 30 ml/kg bolus and then IV fluids as needed and without limit as well as IV vasopressors to maintain a MAP\>65, determined by the primary care team for the duration of the study.
Restrictive Care
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to the restrictive fluid resuscitation strategy will be LIMITED to 60 ml/kg (up to 6000 ml) of IV fluids as initial resuscitation followed by administration of IV vasopressors to maintain a MAP\>65 mm Hg for the first 72 hours of care. The intervention is defined as capping the total allowed IVF administered. After 72 hours the participants are eligible for IV fluids as determined by the primary care team.
Interventions
Normal Saline or Ringers Lactate limited to 60ml/kg for first 72 hours
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patients must be suspected by the treating physician to have sepsis causing their acute illness as exhibited by 2 or more of the following Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria was well as a known or suspected infection at the time of screening:
- Temperature of \> 38 C or \< 36 C
- Heart rate of \> 90/min
- Respiratory rate of \> 20/min or PaCO2 \< 32 mm Hg
- White blood cell count \> 12000/mm3 or \< 4000/mm3 or \>10% immature bands.
- Since approximately 12% of patients ultimately diagnosed with sepsis do not meet SIRS criteria , SIRS negative patients will be eligible for the study if the treating physician makes a clinical diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock.
- Patients must be suspected of having severe sepsis or septic shock defined as refractory hypotension or a lactic acid\>4 at the time of enrollment. Refractory hypotension is defined as having a SBP \<90 or MAP \<65, for 15 minutes, following 1000 mL of IV fluid or a blood pressure maintained by vasopressor administration.
- Patients must have received less than 60ml/kg of intravenous fluid at time of study enrollment.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a PRIMARY diagnosis of acute cerebral vascular event, acute coronary syndrome, acute pulmonary edema, status asthmaticus, active gastrointestinal bleeding, seizure, drug overdose, burn, trauma, requirement for immediate surgery, or undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
- Patients who have a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock and additionally have an active fluid wasting process such as extensive diarrhea, diabetes insipidus, cerebral salt wasting, or an osmotic diuresis.
- Patients who have a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock who have a concurrent diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar non-ketotic hyperglycemia, or rhabdomyolysis.
- Patients who have received \>60 ml/kg of IVF resuscitation.
- Patient who are \<18 years old, pregnant, or incarcerated.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rhode Island Hosptial
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
Related Publications (25)
Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1303-10. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002.
PMID: 11445675BACKGROUNDVincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, Gerlach H, Moreno R, Carlet J, Le Gall JR, Payen D; Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients Investigators. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):344-53. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000194725.48928.3a.
PMID: 16424713BACKGROUNDRivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, Peterson E, Tomlanovich M; Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1368-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010307.
PMID: 11794169BACKGROUNDHolst LB, Haase N, Wetterslev J, Wernerman J, Guttormsen AB, Karlsson S, Johansson PI, Aneman A, Vang ML, Winding R, Nebrich L, Nibro HL, Rasmussen BS, Lauridsen JR, Nielsen JS, Oldner A, Pettila V, Cronhjort MB, Andersen LH, Pedersen UG, Reiter N, Wiis J, White JO, Russell L, Thornberg KJ, Hjortrup PB, Muller RG, Moller MH, Steensen M, Tjader I, Kilsand K, Odeberg-Wernerman S, Sjobo B, Bundgaard H, Thyo MA, Lodahl D, Maerkedahl R, Albeck C, Illum D, Kruse M, Winkel P, Perner A; TRISS Trial Group; Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group. Lower versus higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 9;371(15):1381-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406617. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
PMID: 25270275BACKGROUNDJones AE, Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, Arnold RC, Claremont HA, Kline JA; Emergency Medicine Shock Research Network (EMShockNet) Investigators. Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2010 Feb 24;303(8):739-46. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.158.
PMID: 20179283BACKGROUNDProCESS Investigators; Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, Barnato AE, Weissfeld LA, Pike F, Terndrup T, Wang HE, Hou PC, LoVecchio F, Filbin MR, Shapiro NI, Angus DC. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014 May 1;370(18):1683-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
PMID: 24635773BACKGROUNDMouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, Harrison DA, Sadique MZ, Grieve RD, Jahan R, Harvey SE, Bell D, Bion JF, Coats TJ, Singer M, Young JD, Rowan KM; ProMISe Trial Investigators. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1301-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
PMID: 25776532BACKGROUNDARISE Investigators; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group; Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Cameron PA, Cooper DJ, Higgins AM, Holdgate A, Howe BD, Webb SA, Williams P. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 16;371(16):1496-506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404380. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
PMID: 25272316BACKGROUNDMarik PE. Early management of severe sepsis: concepts and controversies. Chest. 2014 Jun;145(6):1407-1418. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2104.
PMID: 24889440BACKGROUNDDellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb S, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
PMID: 23361625BACKGROUNDHilton AK, Bellomo R. A critique of fluid bolus resuscitation in severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2012 Jan 25;16(1):302. doi: 10.1186/cc11154.
PMID: 22277834BACKGROUNDHilton AK, Bellomo R. Totem and taboo: fluids in sepsis. Crit Care. 2011;15(3):164. doi: 10.1186/cc10247. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
PMID: 21672278BACKGROUNDLandry DW, Oliver JA. The pathogenesis of vasodilatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 23;345(8):588-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra002709. No abstract available.
PMID: 11529214BACKGROUNDUeda S, Nishio K, Akai Y, Fukushima H, Ueyama T, Kawai Y, Masui K, Yoshioka A, Okuchi K. Prognostic value of increased plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide in patients with septic shock. Shock. 2006 Aug;26(2):134-9. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000226266.99960.d0.
PMID: 16878020BACKGROUNDZhang Z, Zhang Z, Xue Y, Xu X, Ni H. Prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its potential role in guiding fluid therapy in critically ill septic patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Dec 31;20:86. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-86.
PMID: 23276277BACKGROUNDBruegger D, Jacob M, Rehm M, Loetsch M, Welsch U, Conzen P, Becker BF. Atrial natriuretic peptide induces shedding of endothelial glycocalyx in coronary vascular bed of guinea pig hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005 Nov;289(5):H1993-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00218.2005. Epub 2005 Jun 17.
PMID: 15964925BACKGROUNDBruegger D, Schwartz L, Chappell D, Jacob M, Rehm M, Vogeser M, Christ F, Reichart B, Becker BF. Release of atrial natriuretic peptide precedes shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx equally in patients undergoing on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Basic Res Cardiol. 2011 Nov;106(6):1111-21. doi: 10.1007/s00395-011-0203-y. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
PMID: 21769675BACKGROUNDAlphonsus CS, Rodseth RN. The endothelial glycocalyx: a review of the vascular barrier. Anaesthesia. 2014 Jul;69(7):777-84. doi: 10.1111/anae.12661. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
PMID: 24773303BACKGROUNDBark BP, Persson J, Grande PO. Importance of the infusion rate for the plasma expanding effect of 5% albumin, 6% HES 130/0.4, 4% gelatin, and 0.9% NaCl in the septic rat. Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):857-66. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318274157e.
PMID: 23318490BACKGROUNDMicek ST, McEvoy C, McKenzie M, Hampton N, Doherty JA, Kollef MH. Fluid balance and cardiac function in septic shock as predictors of hospital mortality. Crit Care. 2013 Oct 20;17(5):R246. doi: 10.1186/cc13072.
PMID: 24138869BACKGROUNDBoyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell JA. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):259-65. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feeb15.
PMID: 20975548BACKGROUNDKelm DJ, Perrin JT, Cartin-Ceba R, Gajic O, Schenck L, Kennedy CC. Fluid overload in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated with early goal-directed therapy is associated with increased acute need for fluid-related medical interventions and hospital death. Shock. 2015 Jan;43(1):68-73. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000268.
PMID: 25247784BACKGROUNDMaitland K, Kiguli S, Opoka RO, Engoru C, Olupot-Olupot P, Akech SO, Nyeko R, Mtove G, Reyburn H, Lang T, Brent B, Evans JA, Tibenderana JK, Crawley J, Russell EC, Levin M, Babiker AG, Gibb DM; FEAST Trial Group. Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with severe infection. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 30;364(26):2483-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1101549. Epub 2011 May 26.
PMID: 21615299BACKGROUNDKaukonen KM, Bailey M, Pilcher D, Cooper DJ, Bellomo R. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 23;372(17):1629-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415236. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
PMID: 25776936BACKGROUNDHeyland DK, Muscedere J, Drover J, Jiang X, Day AG; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Persistent organ dysfunction plus death: a novel, composite outcome measure for critical care trials. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R98. doi: 10.1186/cc10110. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
PMID: 21418560BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Keith Corl, MD
Department of Pulmonary Critical Care Brown University
- STUDY CHAIR
Mitchell Levy, MD
Department of Pulmonary Critical Care Brown University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Amy Palmisciano, RN, BSN
Department of Pulmonary Critical Care Brown University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 10, 2017
First Posted
May 2, 2017
Study Start
April 20, 2017
Primary Completion
March 30, 2018
Study Completion
March 30, 2018
Last Updated
August 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06