The Validity of Maximal Diaphragm Thickening Fraction to Measure Diaphragm Function in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
SNIFF III
1 other identifier
observational
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed to determine whether maximal diaphragm thickening fraction measured by ultrasound during volitional maximal inspiratory efforts is a valid measure of diaphragm function in mechanically ventilated patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Nov 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2020
CompletedAugust 21, 2020
August 1, 2020
4.4 years
April 5, 2017
August 19, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Maximal diaphragm thickening fraction
Diaphragm ultrasound to measure thickening fraction
On day of study
Study Arms (1)
Patients weaning from mechanical ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
Critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation who meet readiness-to-wean criteria.
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) with acute respiratory failure receiving invasive mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube or tracheostomy
- Patients who meet readiness-to-wean criteria (triggering the ventilator; FiO2 ≤ 50%; PEEP ≤ 8 cm H20; hemodynamic stability)
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to phrenic nerve stimulation (chest tube; cardiac pacemaker or implanted defibrillator; cervical implants; use of neuromuscular blocking agents within the 24 hours preceding the first diaphragm assessment (with the exception of succinylcholine used during rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia for intubation); cervical spine injury; known pregnancy)
- Patients experiencing an acute exacerbation of an obstructive lung disease (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, bronchiectasis)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2N2, Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ewan C Goligher, MD, PhD
University Health Network, Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Associate
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2017
First Posted
April 26, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 1, 2020
Study Completion
April 1, 2020
Last Updated
August 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Currently, there is no plan to make data available to other researchers.