NCT03580720

Brief Summary

Mechanical ventilation may be necessary to save the life of a patient due to an accident, pneumonia or surgery. The ventilator then temporarily takes over the function of the respiratory muscles. During treatment in the Intensive Care, the amount of support provided by the ventilator is usually lowered gradually, until the point that the patient can breathe unassisted once again. However, in a large fraction of patients (up to 40%) it takes days to weeks before the patient is able to breathe unassisted, even after the initial disease has been treated. This is called prolonged weaning. A possible cause of prolonged weaning is weakness of the respiratory muscles. The diaphragm, the largest respiratory muscle, can become weakened if it is used too little, much like all other muscles in the body. Additionally, damage and weakness of the diaphragm can occur when the diaphragm has to work excessively. Therefore, it is important that the diaphragm works enough; not so little that it becomes weakened, but not too much either. Measurements of pressure generated by the diaphragm are needed to determine the current level of diaphragm activity in a patient on mechanical ventilation. However, these measurements are rarely performed, because they are time-consuming and require placement of two additional nasogastric catheters. This is a shame, as adequate loading of the diaphragm might prevent development of weakness, leading to shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. Finding alternative measurements of diaphragm effort might be a solution to this problem. It has been hypothesized that the electrical activity of the diaphragm provides a reliable indication of diaphragm effort. This study aims to determine whether there is a correlation between pressure generation by the diaphragm and electrical activity of the diaphragm over a wide range of respiratory activity, from low effort to extreme effort, in healthy volunteers.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
17

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 16, 2018

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 8, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 9, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 15, 2019

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

May 20, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

June 8, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 19, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

MonitoringBreathing effortIntensive CareDiaphragm weakness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Electrical activity of the diaphragm

    Diaphragm electromyography will be obtained with multiple electrode pairs situated on specialized esophageal catheters. The raw diaphragm electromyography will be filtered and integrated to obtain the compound mean action potential reported in microvolts (μV) as described in ref 1 (Sinderby et al.).

    Electrical activity of the diaphragm will be assessed at multiple levels of breathing effort in each subject for two hours.

  • Transdiaphragmatic pressure

    The pressure gradient over the diaphragm will be obtained by subtracting the esophageal pressure from the pressure in the stomach, measured with specialized catheters, and will be reported in centimeters of water (cmH2O) as described in ref 3, American Thoracic Society (ATS) statement on respiratory muscle testing.

    Transdiaphragmatic pressure will be assessed at multiple levels of breathing effort in each subject for two hours.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Work of breathing

    Work of breathing will be assessed at multiple levels of breathing effort in each subject for two hours.

  • Pressure-time product of the diaphragm

    Pressure-time product of the diaphragm will be assessed at multiple levels of breathing effort in each subject for two hours.

  • Pressure-time product of the respiratory muscles

    Pressure-time product of the respiratory muscles will be assessed at multiple levels of breathing effort in each subject for two hours.

  • Mechanical power

    Mechanical power will be assessed at multiple levels of breathing effort in each subject for two hours.

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Accessory muscle recruitment

    Two hours.

  • Diaphragm thickening fraction.

    Thickening fractions will be obtained at multiple levels of breathing effort in each subject for up to two hours

Study Arms (1)

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention group, receiving Inspiratory threshold loading protocol.

Other: Inspiratory threshold loading protocol

Interventions

Subjects will be instrumented with catheters that measure electrical activity of the diaphragm and transdiaphragmatic pressure. Subjects will perform a stepwise inspiratory threshold loading protocol to induce a wide range of diaphragm activity.

Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Informed Consent
  • Age \>18 years

You may not qualify if:

  • History of cardiac and/or pulmonary disease or current medication use
  • History of pneumothorax
  • Contra-indications for nasogastric tube placement (recent epistaxis, severe coagulopathy, current upper airway pathology)
  • Contra-indication for magnetic stimulation (cardiac pacemakers or metal in cervical area)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081HV, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Sinderby CA, Beck JC, Lindstrom LH, Grassino AE. Enhancement of signal quality in esophageal recordings of diaphragm EMG. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997 Apr;82(4):1370-7. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.4.1370.

    PMID: 9104877BACKGROUND
  • Vivier E, Mekontso Dessap A, Dimassi S, Vargas F, Lyazidi A, Thille AW, Brochard L. Diaphragm ultrasonography to estimate the work of breathing during non-invasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2012 May;38(5):796-803. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2547-7. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

    PMID: 22476448BACKGROUND
  • American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS Statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug 15;166(4):518-624. doi: 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12186831BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Muscle WeaknessRespiratory Aspiration

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and SymptomsRespiration DisordersRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Angelique Spoelstra - de Man, MD, PhD

    Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Leo Heunks, MD, PhD

    Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2018

First Posted

July 9, 2018

Study Start

May 16, 2018

Primary Completion

April 15, 2019

Study Completion

April 30, 2019

Last Updated

May 20, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Locations