NCT03127462

Brief Summary

60 newly referred patients with psoriasis at the Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark will be consecutive included in the study. In the first phase of the study 30 patients will receive standard treatment (control group) and in the following phase 30 patients will receive the individualized conversational/educational intervention (intervention group).The rationale for using a historical control group instead of a randomised control group is that it in"real-life setting" is unpractical to realize a communicative intervention, because clinicians unintentional can intervene against the control group. The first conversation will take place when the newly referred patient has initiated a new treatment. The rational for this is that the time of transition from private practice to the Department of Dermatology and Allergy is characterised by failed treatment, typically phototherapy or topical. This meaning that newly referred patients current needs is to get their psoriasis under control. When patients have initiated a medical treatment they will be more motivated and have better surplus to engage in the conversational/educational intervention. Patients in the intervention group will receive an individual face-to-face conversation with a duration of 45 min. All patients will have access to telephone counselling by their primary nurse when needed and able to arrange a new face-to-face conversation. After 4-6 weeks the face-to-face the nurse will of conversation reach out to the patient by phone to follow up on the earlier conversation. Three months after the face-to-face conversation the nurse will offer the patient a closing face-to-face conversation of 15 min at the same time where the patient has a doctor appointment at the department. Those who are in the control group will continue standard care and not receive any conversation and be used as the control group. The intervention will be provided by a team of specialized dermatological nurses who have received a formal training on patient-centred communication, Self-regulatory Model/Common Sense Model interviewing, the life with chronic disease and action plan support.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 30, 2017

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 25, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2017

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

February 19, 2018

Status Verified

February 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

March 30, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 16, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The brief Illness Perception Questionnaire

    Illness perception

    Change from Baseline at 3 month follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Dermatology Life Quality Index

    Change from Baseline at 3 month follow-up

Other Outcomes (4)

  • The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care

    Change from Baseline at 3 month follow-up

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Change from Baseline at 3 month follow-up

  • Body Image Scale

    Change from Baseline at 3 month follow-up

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Individualized Education

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Nurse-led educational intervention

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

Patients in the intervention group will receive an individual face-to-face conversation with a duration of 45 min. All patients will have access to telephone counselling by their primary nurse when needed and able to arrange a new face-to-face conversation. After 4-6 weeks the face-to-face the nurse will of conversation reach out to the patient by phone to follow up on the earlier conversation. Three months after the face-to-face conversation the nurse will offer the patient a closing face-to-face conversation of 15 min at the same time where the patient has a doctor appointment at the department. Those who are in the control group will continue standard care and not receive any conversation and be used as the control group.

Individualized Education

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Newly referred patients with psoriasis at the Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 18 years or older and understand Danish.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients younger than 18 years

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen

Copenhagen, 2900, Denmark

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin Diseases, PapulosquamousSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Lina Khoury

CONTACT

Lone Skov

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: In the first phase of the study 30 patients will receive standard treatment (control group) and in the following phase 30 patients will receive the individualized conversational/educational intervention (intervention group).The rationale for using a historical control group instead of a randomised control group is that it in"real-life setting" is unpractical to realize a communicative intervention, because clinicians unintentional can intervene against the control group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Ph.D student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2017

First Posted

April 25, 2017

Study Start

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion

August 1, 2018

Study Completion

August 1, 2018

Last Updated

February 19, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations