Assessing Patient Confidence in Biologic Medications
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In dermatology, biologic medications are used to treat conditions such as moderate-to-severe psoriasis. These medications generally function to decrease inflammation or disrupt the inflammatory cycle. Examples of biologic medications commonly used in dermatology include tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), blockers/inhibitors (etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab), interleukin 12/23 blockers (ustekinumab) and interleukin 17A blockers (secukinumab, ixekizumab). Due to biologic medication's efficacy and safety profiles, they have revolutionized dermatology and the general medical field. However, patients may be apprehensive about choosing a biologic medication for a variety of reasons. These include hearing negative information about the drug from friends or family, being nervous about injection, or seeing the drug or its side effects negatively portrayed in the media. Many patients are not aware that clinical trial evidence for biologics exist, and instead may rely on anecdotal evidence in choosing to take these medications. Because fear of the drug is inherently subjective, it can be modified with appropriate reassurance and presentation of evidence. Physicians must be able to ascertain from where the fear originates and how it can be countered. By understanding what kind of information will allow patients to be confident in their decision to take a biologic, dermatologists can improve outcomes and initiate use of this drug. Furthermore, reducing fear of side effects or adverse events may improve adherence to treatment and may improve treatment outcomes. The investigators propose this study with the goal of learning whether patients are more confident in the potential success of biologic medications in treating their psoriasis after being presented with clinical trial evidence, anecdotal evidence, or both.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 3, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 3, 2021
CompletedJuly 2, 2025
May 1, 2025
4 years
May 24, 2017
June 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oral survey responses
Oral survey response from 1 (not willing) to 10 (completely willing) scale to take a treatment
1 day
Study Arms (4)
Anecdotal Evidence
ACTIVE COMPARATORScenario describes a medication's (biologic's) therapeutic effect results based on anecdotal evidence.
Research Study Evidence
ACTIVE COMPARATORScenario describes a medication's (biologic's) therapeutic effect results based on research study evidence.
Anecdotal + Research Study Evidence
ACTIVE COMPARATORScenario describes a medication's (biologic's) therapeutic effect results based on research study evidence and anecdotal evidence.
No Evidence
PLACEBO COMPARATORScenario describes a medication's (biologic's) therapeutic effect with no mention on anecdotal nor research study evidence.
Interventions
Communicate basic information on the therapeutic effect of a drug using only anecdotal evidence.
Communicate basic information on the therapeutic effect of a drug using only research study evidence.
Communicate basic information on the therapeutic effect of a drug using only anecdotal and research study evidence.
Communicate basic information on the therapeutic effect of a drug using neither anecdotal evidence nor research study evidence.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with psoriasis (ICD-9: 696.1)
- Age 18-80
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals younger than 18 (line of questioning necessary for the study may be beyond understanding in this age group)
- Currently or previously managed with a biologic medication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wake Forest University Health Sciences Department of Dermatology
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steve R Feldman, MD, PhD
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2017
First Posted
May 30, 2017
Study Start
June 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 3, 2021
Study Completion
June 3, 2021
Last Updated
July 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share