NCT03168347

Brief Summary

In dermatology, biologic medications are used to treat conditions such as moderate-to-severe psoriasis. These medications generally function to decrease inflammation or disrupt the inflammatory cycle. Examples of biologic medications commonly used in dermatology include tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), blockers/inhibitors (etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab), interleukin 12/23 blockers (ustekinumab) and interleukin 17A blockers (secukinumab, ixekizumab). Due to biologic medication's efficacy and safety profiles, they have revolutionized dermatology and the general medical field. However, patients may be apprehensive about choosing a biologic medication for a variety of reasons. These include hearing negative information about the drug from friends or family, being nervous about injection, or seeing the drug or its side effects negatively portrayed in the media. Many patients are not aware that clinical trial evidence for biologics exist, and instead may rely on anecdotal evidence in choosing to take these medications. Because fear of the drug is inherently subjective, it can be modified with appropriate reassurance and presentation of evidence. Physicians must be able to ascertain from where the fear originates and how it can be countered. By understanding what kind of information will allow patients to be confident in their decision to take a biologic, dermatologists can improve outcomes and initiate use of this drug. Furthermore, reducing fear of side effects or adverse events may improve adherence to treatment and may improve treatment outcomes. The investigators propose this study with the goal of learning whether patients are more confident in the potential success of biologic medications in treating their psoriasis after being presented with clinical trial evidence, anecdotal evidence, or both.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 24, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 30, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2017

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 3, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 3, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 2, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

May 24, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 27, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Decision making

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Oral survey responses

    Oral survey response from 1 (not willing) to 10 (completely willing) scale to take a treatment

    1 day

Study Arms (4)

Anecdotal Evidence

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Scenario describes a medication's (biologic's) therapeutic effect results based on anecdotal evidence.

Behavioral: Anecdotal Evidence

Research Study Evidence

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Scenario describes a medication's (biologic's) therapeutic effect results based on research study evidence.

Behavioral: Research Study Evidence

Anecdotal + Research Study Evidence

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Scenario describes a medication's (biologic's) therapeutic effect results based on research study evidence and anecdotal evidence.

Behavioral: Anecdotal + Research Study Evidence

No Evidence

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Scenario describes a medication's (biologic's) therapeutic effect with no mention on anecdotal nor research study evidence.

Behavioral: No Evidence

Interventions

Communicate basic information on the therapeutic effect of a drug using only anecdotal evidence.

Anecdotal Evidence

Communicate basic information on the therapeutic effect of a drug using only research study evidence.

Research Study Evidence

Communicate basic information on the therapeutic effect of a drug using only anecdotal and research study evidence.

Anecdotal + Research Study Evidence
No EvidenceBEHAVIORAL

Communicate basic information on the therapeutic effect of a drug using neither anecdotal evidence nor research study evidence.

No Evidence

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with psoriasis (ICD-9: 696.1)
  • Age 18-80

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals younger than 18 (line of questioning necessary for the study may be beyond understanding in this age group)
  • Currently or previously managed with a biologic medication

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Wake Forest University Health Sciences Department of Dermatology

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin Diseases, PapulosquamousSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Steve R Feldman, MD, PhD

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2017

First Posted

May 30, 2017

Study Start

June 1, 2017

Primary Completion

June 3, 2021

Study Completion

June 3, 2021

Last Updated

July 2, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations