Does a Group, Task-oriented Community-based Exercise Program Improve Everyday Function in People With Stroke?
Increasing Access to Community-based Task-oriented Exercise Programs Through Healthcare-recreation Partnerships to Improve Function Post-stroke: Feasibility of a 2-group Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
After a stroke, people find it difficult to perform everyday activities independently, like getting dressed, preparing meals, and shopping, limiting their independence and requiring the assistance of a family member, friend or a home care worker. Losing one's independence can decrease quality of life. Functional exercise classes run by physical therapists where people with stroke practice getting in and out of a chair, stepping, and walking, can improve the ability to balance, walk, and do everyday activities. These classes are not commonly available in community centres, mainly because fitness instructors do not receive training in how to run exercise classes for people with stroke. Therefore there is a need to make these functional exercise programs available in local community centres. The objective of this project is to test procedures for running a large study to see whether people with stroke improve their ability to do everyday activities after participating in functional group exercise classes for 12 weeks in local community centres. If ability to do everyday activities improves, the investigators wish to see if the improvement is still present 3, 6 and 9 months later. Physical therapists at a nearby hospital will teach fitness instructors how to run the exercise class, help out during the classes, and answer questions by email or phone. Before conducting the larger Canada-wide study, it is important to determine the interest in such a program, the acceptability of the evaluations and the costs associated with the program, the degree of improvements resulting from the program, and if fitness instructors are able to run the program as planned. In Toronto, London and Pembroke, Canada, managers at a hospital and a nearby recreation centre have agreed to help run the exercise program. A recruiter will ask people with stroke who can walk and are being discharged home from the hospital whether they can be called about the study. People with stroke and a caregiver who agree to participate in the study will complete four evaluations when they enter the study, and 3, 6, and 12 months later. At each evaluation, people with stroke will perform tests of balance and walking, and complete questionnaires about their mood, participation in valued activities, and quality of life. After the first evaluation, the investigators will use a process like flipping a coin, to see if the person with stroke will begin the exercise program immediately or 12 months later. The investigators will call people each month to ask if a fall occurred. The investigators will interview exercise participants, family members and hospital/recreation staff at the end of the study to ask about the experiences. This project is unique because the program combines the expert knowledge and skills of physical therapists and fitness instructors. The exercise program involves practicing everyday movements, making the exercises easy for fitness instructors and people with stroke to learn. Each exercise has multiple levels of difficulty so the instructor can adapt exercises to how the person is feeling. The exercise program does not require expensive equipment (e.g. chairs, stepping stools) and therefore can be offered in most community centres. Finally, an extensive network of hospitals providing stroke care and community centres run by recreation organizations exists in Canada. Thus, if this program is beneficial, it could easily be made widely available. With the number of Canadians living with the consequences of stroke increasing every year, access to a functional exercise programs in local community centres will improve their ability to function and live independently in the community and reduce the burden on family or caregivers and on the healthcare system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Feb 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2019
CompletedJanuary 12, 2021
January 1, 2021
2.1 years
April 10, 2017
January 8, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO)
10-item, self-report questionnaire. 2 subscales: physical function (5 items), social function (5 items)
Change from baseline to 3 months.
Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL)
22-item, self-report performance of instrumental ADL in 4 categories: mobility, kitchen, domestic, and leisure.
Change from baseline to 3 months.
Secondary Outcomes (43)
Barthel Index
5 Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Stroke Impact Scale
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Berg Balance Test
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
- +38 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Group
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention is a group, task-oriented exercise program involving two 1-hour exercise classes per week for 12 weeks. The class involves a seated warm-up, repetitive, progressive practice of functional balance and mobility tasks, and a seated cool down. The warm-up consists of active range-of-motion exercises, aerobic exercise, leg loading, stretching, and sit-to-stand training. The cool-down involves exercises with an emphasis on stretching and relaxation. Tasks are organized in a 3-station circuit completed by participants grouped by overall ability: Superstation 1: walking, aerobic training, and wall work (standing and reaching, wall push-ups); Superstation 2: standing weight shifts, coordinated with stepping and lunging; and Superstation 3: tap-ups, step-ups, and heel/toe raises, hamstring curls, marching-on-the-spot, and mini-squats. Participants are instructed to be physically active by walking in their neighbourhood, practicing the program exercises, or using the stairs.
Wait-listed Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will receive usual care which will be monitored and is expected to consist of provision of a home exercise program and information on community resources according to current best practices. At the end of the study period, participants in the control group will be offered to participate in the 3-month exercise program.
Interventions
The TIME program is an evidence-based, standardized, progressive, licensed exercise program developed by physical therapists at the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of stroke recorded in the health record;
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Living at home for at least 3 months;
- Ability to walk a minimum of 10 metres with or without walking aids without assistance from another person;
- Ability to follow verbal instructions or demonstrations of the exercises;
- Ability to speak and read English; and
- Willingness to obtain medical clearance from a healthcare provider and sign a liability waiver.
You may not qualify if:
- Self-reported involvement in another formal exercise or rehabilitation program;
- Conditions or symptoms preventing participation in exercise (e.g., unstable cardiovascular disease, significant joint pain);
- Cognitive or behavioural deficits that would prevent cooperation within a group;
- Self-reported ability to walk more than 20 minutes without a seated rest; and
- Self-reported ability to manage environmental barriers (curbs, ramps, and stairs) with relative ease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Torontolead
- University Health Network, Torontocollaborator
- Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canadacollaborator
- University of Western Ontario, Canadacollaborator
- Ontario Stroke Networkcollaborator
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciencescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Toronto, Department of Physical Therapy
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Aravind G, Bashir K, Cameron JI, Bayley MT, Teasell RW, Howe JA, Tee A, Jaglal SB, Hunter S, Salbach NM. What matters to program partners when implementing a community-based exercise program for people post-stroke? A theory-based qualitative study and cost analysis. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Aug 14;4:1064206. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1064206. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37645234DERIVEDAravind G, Bashir K, Cameron JI, Howe JA, Jaglal SB, Bayley MT, Teasell RW, Moineddin R, Zee J, Wodchis WP, Tee A, Hunter S, Salbach NM. Community-based exercise programs incorporating healthcare-community partnerships to improve function post-stroke: feasibility of a 2-group randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Apr 22;8(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01037-9.
PMID: 35459194DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nancy Salbach, PhD
University of Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessors will be unaware of group assignment
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 10, 2017
First Posted
April 21, 2017
Study Start
February 2, 2017
Primary Completion
February 28, 2019
Study Completion
May 30, 2019
Last Updated
January 12, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share