Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy
Should Surgical Experience Change Our Treatment Strategy on Acute Cholecystitis? Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
176
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study examines complications, mortality rates, cost-effectiveness and safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC). Group L (n:88) patients treated surgically with laparoscopic cholecystectomy immediately or Group D (n:88) patients first treated medically and than treated surgically with delayed (4-8 weeks later) laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2017
CompletedApril 25, 2017
April 1, 2017
1 year
March 28, 2017
April 23, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hospital stay
time spent totally in the hospital; time from admission to discharge from hospital in days
4 to 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Costs of treatment
4 to 8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Group L (n:88)
OTHERpatients treated surgically with laparoscopic cholecystectomy immediately
Group D (n:88)
OTHERpatients first treated medically and than treated surgically with delayed (4-8 weeks later) laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Interventions
First trocar was inserted with Hasson method (Subumbilical 1 cm vertical incision was made and first 10-mm trocar (VersaportTM plus V2, Covidien, USA) inserted under direct vision) and pneumoperitoneum was created with 12 mm Hg pressure. Second 10-mm trocar was inserted from subxyphoid area. Two 5-mm trocars were inserted in the right upper quadrant area. After general intrabdominal exploration, dissection was started to ensure safe-view of Calot triangle. In case of quite tough gallbladder for griping, gallbladder was drained with a gray intravenous cannula. Cystic artery and cystic duct were separately dissected and twice ligated with Endo Clip™ II ML (Covidien, USA). Gallbladder was dissected from liver bed carefully. Gallbladder was taken out from abdomen through the subumbilical incision.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients suffering acute cholecystitis in their first 72 hours of pain
You may not qualify if:
- clinical duration longer than 72 hours, complicated acute cholecystitis (bilirubin \>2gr/dl, elevated transaminases (\>100 u/l), and cholestatic enzymes (gamma glutamyl transferase \>50 u/l), ultrasonographically confirmed dilated intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts, and elevated amylase levels three times more than normal range
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Stinton LM, Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver. 2012 Apr;6(2):172-87. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2012.6.2.172. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
PMID: 22570746BACKGROUNDGurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2010 Feb;97(2):141-50. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6870.
PMID: 20035546RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Riza Gurhan Isil, MD
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ast.Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2017
First Posted
April 20, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 15, 2017
Last Updated
April 25, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
I can share study data only without sharing patient names and protocol numbers.