NCT07161960

Brief Summary

Abstract: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is typically managed according to the 2018 Tokyo Guidelines, with treatment strategies determined by the severity of the disease, patient comorbidities, and hospital capabilities. In cases of moderate AC, treatment options include antibiotics with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), antibiotics with early LC, or antibiotics with percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCC) followed by delayed LC. However, the Toyo Guideline 2018 suggested that there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal timing for surgery following PCC due to insufficient scientific evidence. In practice, delayed LC is often performed approximately 6 weeks after PCC insertion. While PCC can serve as a treatment option before definite surgery, complications such as tube dislodgment, obstruction, and failure to ambulate are common, leading to further hospital admissions and increased comorbidities. The ESCAPE trial was conducted to evaluate the optimal timing for LC following PCC in moderate and severe forms of acute cholecystitis, with the goal of improving treatment standards and reducing complications associated with PCC retention. We hypothesize that early LC after PCC insertion will be a feasible and effective alternative. Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled patients diagnosed with moderate to severe acute cholecystitis who underwent PCC. Clinical manifestations and laboratory parameters were monitored for 72 hours following PCC insertion. Patients demonstrating clinical or laboratory improvement were subsequently randomized into two groups: early LC and delayed LC.

  • Early LC group: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed during the same hospitalization.
  • Delayed LC group: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed more than 6 weeks after PCC insertion. The primary endpoint/outcome is comprehensive complication index (CCI) from PCC and LC. Secondary endpoints include Nasaar Difficulty Scoring, length of hospital stay, rate of subtotal cholecystectomy, rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy and incidence of bile duct injury. Results and Discussion: The results of this study will provide valuable insights into the timing of LC following PCC and may influence future treatment protocols for moderate and severe acute cholecystitis. By assessing the feasibility and safety of early LC after PCC insertion, the ESCAPE trial aims to reduce the burden of PCC-related complications and optimize patient outcomes.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
16mo left

Started Jul 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress41%
Jul 2025Nov 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 31, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 9, 2025

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2027

Expected
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2027

Last Updated

September 25, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

August 31, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 20, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Acute cholecystitisPercutaneous cholecystostomyLaparoscopic cholecystectomyEarly LCDelay LC

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comprehensive Complication Index from PCC and LC

    Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)is a score derived from Clavien-Dindo Classification. In this study, the complications include both from Percutaneous Cholecystostomy (PCC) and from Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC). The Clavien-Dindo Classification is ranging from 1 (any deviation from postoperative course) to 5 (death). CCI integrates all CD complications and weights its severity. CCI is ranging from 0 (no complication) to 100 (death).

    From enrollment to 3 months postoperative

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Nasaar Difficulty Scoring

    During the operation

  • Length of Hospital Stay (LOS)

    During enrollment to 3 months postoperative or date that complication resolves

  • Rate of Conversion to Open Cholecystectomy

    During the operation

  • Rate of Subtotal Cholecystectomy

    During the operation

  • Incidence of Bile Duct Injury

    During the operation to 3 months postoperative

Study Arms (2)

Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

EXPERIMENTAL

The patients will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) within the same admission of PCC and after PCC for 72 hours, usually not more than 2 weeks.

Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Delay Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

EXPERIMENTAL

The patients will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after 6 weeks from PCC insertion, avoiding active inflammation and swelling

Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Interventions

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the definite treatment for acute cholecystitis. According to Tokyo Guideline 2018, the proper timing of delay LC remains unclear due to lack to proper evidence.

Delay Laparoscopic CholecystectomyEarly Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The patients are diagnosed moderate or severe from of acute cholecystitis according to Tokyo Guideline 2018.
  • PCC insertion was performed by body interventionists or surgeons.
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed in Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Lampang Hospital and Phrae Hospital.
  • Age equal or more than 20 years-old

You may not qualify if:

  • The patients that suspected CBD stone and need to undergo EUS / ERCP.
  • Coincidence perihepatic abscess or liver abscess
  • The patients with active or severe underlying disease, whom specialists suggest to postpone an operation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University 110 Inthawarorot Road, Sri Phum, Mueang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand

Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Yamazaki S, Shimizu A, Kubota K, Notake T, Yoshizawa T, Masuo H, Sakai H, Hosoda K, Hayashi H, Yasukawa K, Umemura K, Kamachi A, Goto T, Tomida H, Seki H, Shimura M, Soejima Y. Urgent versus elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for high-risk grade II acute cholecystitis. Asian J Surg. 2023 Jan;46(1):431-437. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.05.046. Epub 2022 May 21.

  • Woodward SG, Rios-Diaz AJ, Zheng R, McPartland C, Tholey R, Tatarian T, Palazzo F. Finding the Most Favorable Timing for Cholecystectomy after Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tube Placement: An Analysis of Institutional and National Data. J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jan;232(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

  • Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Endo I, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Pitt HA, Umezawa A, Asai K, Han HS, Hwang TL, Mori Y, Yoon YS, Huang WS, Belli G, Dervenis C, Yokoe M, Kiriyama S, Itoi T, Jagannath P, Garden OJ, Miura F, Nakamura M, Horiguchi A, Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, de Santibanes E, Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Ukai T, Higuchi R, Wada K, Honda G, Supe AN, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Gouma DJ, Deziel DJ, Liau KH, Chen MF, Shibao K, Liu KH, Su CH, Chan ACW, Yoon DS, Choi IS, Jonas E, Chen XP, Fan ST, Ker CG, Gimenez ME, Kitano S, Inomata M, Hirata K, Inui K, Sumiyama Y, Yamamoto M. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):55-72. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.516. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

  • Molavi I, Schellenberg A, Christian F. Clinical and operative outcomes of patients with acute cholecystitis who are treated initially with image-guided cholecystostomy. Can J Surg. 2018 Jun;61(3):195-199. doi: 10.1503/cjs.003517.

  • Bao J, Wang J, Shang H, Hao C, Liu J, Zhang D, Han S, Li Z. The choice of operation timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective clinical analysis. Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Aug;10(8):9096-9104. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1906.

  • Lyu Y, Li T, Wang B, Cheng Y. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2516. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82089-4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cholecystitis, Acute

Interventions

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CholecystitisGallbladder DiseasesBiliary Tract DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CholecystectomyBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresDigestive System Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeLaparoscopyEndoscopyMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Central Study Contacts

Yada Suwan, Doctor of Medicine

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Yada Suwan, Doctor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2025

First Posted

September 9, 2025

Study Start

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Last Updated

September 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

According to the ethic consideration by the committee of Research, Chiang Mai University, the identification and all treatment history will be reached by the researchers, data collectors and analyzers only to keep privacy for the participants.

Locations