A Comparison of US and Evoked Motor Response-guided Placement of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block Following TKA
Comparison of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block Using Ultrasound Versus Ultrasound and Nerve Stimulation Using Stimulating Catheter in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
82
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine which technique for catheter placement in continuous femoral nerve block (FNB) is most successful - guidance with (1) ultrasound or (2) nerve stimulation and ultrasound. Sensory and motor assessment scores will be obtained post-FNB. Patient controlled analgesia and opiate consumption is also recorded along with pain scores for the first 48 hour post-FNB.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 2, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2017
CompletedApril 28, 2017
April 1, 2017
12 months
April 4, 2017
April 26, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean numeric pain score (NRS)
Pain score assessed 24 hours post-block insertion using numeric pain scale from 0-10
24 hours post-block insertion
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Time to perform the block
At the time of block procedure
Sensation over the skin of the thigh to determine sensory block using 3 point grading scale
30 min post-block insertion
Quadriceps muscle strength to determine motor block using 3 point grading scale
30 min post-block insertion
Total hydromorphone used (oral and intravenous PCA)
24 hours post-block
Total hydromorphone used (oral and intravenous PCA)
48 hours post-block
Study Arms (2)
Ultrasound
EXPERIMENTALFemoral catheters inserted using ultrasound only
Ultrasound + Nerve Stimulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORFemoral catheters inserted using ultrasound with nerve stimulation
Interventions
Femoral catheter inserted using ultrasound and nerve stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to III patients
- Aged 18-75 scheduled for unilateral TKA
You may not qualify if:
- History of significant psychiatric problems
- BMI \> 40 kg/m\^2
- Prior surgery in the inguinal region
- Neurological disease with sensory or motor deficit
- Diabetic neuropathy
- Contraindication to any study medications
- Daily opioid consumption \>10 mg PO morphine (or equivalent) for 2 weeks prior to surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4Y 1H1, Canada
Related Publications (10)
Pham Dang C, Lelong A, Guilley J, Nguyen JM, Volteau C, Venet G, Perrier C, Lejus C, Blanloeil Y. Effect on neurostimulation of injectates used for perineural space expansion before placement of a stimulating catheter: normal saline versus dextrose 5% in water. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):398-403. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181b48648.
PMID: 19920414BACKGROUNDDauri M, Fabbi E, Mariani P, Faria S, Carpenedo R, Sidiropoulou T, Coniglione F, Silvi MB, Sabato AF. Continuous femoral nerve block provides superior analgesia compared with continuous intra-articular and wound infusion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):95-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819baf98.
PMID: 19282706BACKGROUNDPaul JE, Arya A, Hurlburt L, Cheng J, Thabane L, Tidy A, Murthy Y. Femoral nerve block improves analgesia outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1144-62. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f4b18.
PMID: 20966667BACKGROUNDShum CF, Lo NN, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, Chong HC, Yeo SN. Continuous femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty: immediate and two-year outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Feb;24(2):204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.014. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
PMID: 18534496BACKGROUNDCarli F, Clemente A, Asenjo JF, Kim DJ, Mistraletti G, Gomarasca M, Morabito A, Tanzer M. Analgesia and functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty: periarticular infiltration vs continuous femoral nerve block. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Aug;105(2):185-95. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq112. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
PMID: 20551021BACKGROUNDSalinas FV, Liu SS, Mulroy MF. The effect of single-injection femoral nerve block versus continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty on hospital length of stay and long-term functional recovery within an established clinical pathway. Anesth Analg. 2006 Apr;102(4):1234-9. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000198675.20279.81.
PMID: 16551930BACKGROUNDBoezaart AP, de Beer JF, du Toit C, van Rooyen K. A new technique of continuous interscalene nerve block. Can J Anaesth. 1999 Mar;46(3):275-81. doi: 10.1007/BF03012610.
PMID: 10210055BACKGROUNDMartinez Navas A, Vazquez Gutierrez T, Echevarria Moreno M. Continuous lateral popliteal block with stimulating catheters. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Feb;49(2):261-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00574.x.
PMID: 15715632BACKGROUNDCasati A, Fanelli G, Koscielniak-Nielsen Z, Cappelleri G, Aldegheri G, Danelli G, Fuzier R, Singelyn F. Using stimulating catheters for continuous sciatic nerve block shortens onset time of surgical block and minimizes postoperative consumption of pain medication after halux valgus repair as compared with conventional nonstimulating catheters. Anesth Analg. 2005 Oct;101(4):1192-1197. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000167232.10305.cd.
PMID: 16192543BACKGROUNDCappelleri G, Ghisi D, Ceravola E, Guzzetti L, Ambrosoli AL, Gemma M, Cornaggia G. A randomised controlled comparison between stimulating and standard catheters for lumbar plexus block. Anaesthesia. 2015 Aug;70(8):948-55. doi: 10.1111/anae.13077. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
PMID: 25810108BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Imad Awad, MBChB
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2017
First Posted
April 20, 2017
Study Start
January 2, 2012
Primary Completion
December 31, 2012
Study Completion
March 31, 2013
Last Updated
April 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share