Continuous Infraclavicular Blocks: Neurostimulation Versus Ultrasound
Success Rate of Infra-clavicular Blocks: Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Neurostimulation Guided Catheter Placement
2 other identifiers
interventional
210
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ultrasound guidance or nerve stimulation is the best option for placing continuous peripheral nerve block catheters for upper limb surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2013
CompletedAugust 30, 2017
August 1, 2017
3 years
April 20, 2009
August 29, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Neurostimulation versus ultrasound guided infraclavicular catheter placement
Comparision of block success with neurostimulation and ultrasound guided placed infraclavicular catheters
14 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time taken for complete nerve block
14 days
Study Arms (2)
Neurostimulation
PLACEBO COMPARATORBlock catheter will be introduced using neurostimulation
Ultrasound
ACTIVE COMPARATORBlock catheter will be introduced using ultrasound
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-80 yrs
- Weight 40-100 kg
- Either sex
- Height \>150 cm
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3
- Scheduled for hand or elbow surgery under regional anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to give informed consent
- Refusal of treatment randomization
- Language barrier
- Allergy to any medications being used in the study protocol
- Ongoing major medical or psychiatric problems
- Chronic pain or narcotic use/abuse
- Peripheral neuropathy or major neurological problems
- Scarring in area of blockade
- Inability to co-operate with post-operative evaluation
- Major coagulopathy
- Pregnancy and breast feeding
- Patients requiring anesthesia of other surgical sites
- Obese patients (i.e. BMI \>40)
- Postoperatively, patients will be excluded if they have had additional operative procedures requiring a change in the usual protocol of care
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Joseph's Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 4V2, Canada
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shalini Dhir, MD
Western University, Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- DR.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2009
First Posted
June 3, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2013
Last Updated
August 30, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08