Ultrasound-guided Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Study
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to compare the success of the inferior alveolar nerve block using ultrasound versus a traditional landmarking technique (which historically has an approximate failure rate as high as 33.8%). The secondary objective is to demonstrate that delivering a block under ultrasound guidance does not cause any additional pain to patients, as well as to reconfirm data shown in a previous study that the intra-oral transducer is well-tolerated among patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 8, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 29, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 2, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2018
CompletedNovember 20, 2018
November 1, 2018
21 days
August 18, 2017
November 19, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ultrasound vs Traditionally Landmarked Method
Compare the success of the inferior alveolar nerve block using ultrasound versus a traditional landmarking technique using pulpal anaesthesia as assessed by an electric pulp tester.
Immediate
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pain
Immediate
Comfort of ultrasound
Immediate
Interventions
Will deposit local anaesthetic intra-orally with the aid of ultrasound to guide the location of the final deposition.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Torontolead
- Anesthesia Research Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The transducer will remain in place during the performance of the block but the monitor will be above the head of the patient in the 12 o'clock position so as to not be in direct view.
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Masters Student in Dental Anaesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2017
First Posted
November 20, 2018
Study Start
January 8, 2018
Primary Completion
January 29, 2018
Study Completion
February 2, 2018
Last Updated
November 20, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share