Perioperative Fluid Therapy With Balanced Crystalloids
1 other identifier
interventional
112
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Introduction: The strategy of perioperative fluid therapy has an important impact not only on the circulating volume and perfusion of organs and tissues but also on the patient's internal environment. The study aimed at comparing the effects of perioperatively administered balanced crystalloid infusion solutions containing different amounts of metabolizable anions on homeostasis. Methods: In the prospective randomized study, patients were assigned to Plasmalyte (PL) and Ringerfundin (RF) Groups after their postoperative transfer to an intensive care unit (ICU). The infusion solutions were parenterally administered at 1000 mL/6 hours. Arterialized capillary blood was sampled at the time of transfer to the ICU (Time 0), and again at 2 hours and 6 hours from Time 0. The collected blood was tested for blood gas parameters using the Astrup method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jan 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2016
CompletedMay 9, 2017
May 1, 2017
11 months
February 10, 2016
May 8, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with significant acid basic disturbances related to balanced alkalizing as compared with a balanced pH-neutral crystalloids.
The internal environment status is assessed at the time of patients' transfer from the operating room to the ICU (Time 0), and again at 6 hours from Time 0. Outcome over a longer period of time is not rated.
6 hours
Study Arms (2)
Plasmalyte
EXPERIMENTALArm 1: Plasmalyte in 5% glucose infusion solution (PL), manufactured by Baxter Healthcare as slightly alkalizing (Na+ 140; K+ 5.0; Mg2+ 1.5; Cl- 98; acetate 27; gluconate 23)
Ringerfundin
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm 2: Ringerfundin infusion solution (RF), manufactured by B. Braun as acid-base neutral (Na+ 145; K+ 4.0; Mg2+ 1.0; Ca2+ 2.5; Cl- 127; acetate 24; malate 5.0).
Interventions
Parenteral administration of Plasmalyte initiated immediately after collection of the first blood sample at 166 mL/hour. Thus, all patients received 1000 mL of infusion solution over 6 hours.
Parenteral administration of Ringerfundin initiated immediately after collection of the first blood sample at 166 mL/hour. Thus, all patients received 1000 mL of infusion solution over 6 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 18+
- elective surgery procedures
You may not qualify if:
- critically ill, being classified as ASA III or less
- surgery longer than 6 hrs
- hypersensitivity to PL or RF
- requiring more rapid fluid replacement (than 1000 ml/6 hrs) due to postoperative hypovolemia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (13)
Zadak Z, Hyspler R, Hronek M, Ticha A. The energetic and metabolic effect of Ringerfundin (B. Braun) infusion and comparison with Plasma-Lyte (Baxter) in healthy volunteers. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2010;53(3):131-7. doi: 10.14712/18059694.2016.72.
PMID: 21171525BACKGROUNDKirkendol PL, Starrs J, Gonzalez FM. The effects of acetate, lactate, succinate and gluconate on plasma pH and electrolytes in dogs. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1980;26:323-7. No abstract available.
PMID: 7245507BACKGROUNDZavorsky GS, Cao J, Mayo NE, Gabbay R, Murias JM. Arterial versus capillary blood gases: a meta-analysis. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2007 Mar 15;155(3):268-79. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2006.07.002. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
PMID: 16919507BACKGROUNDLowell JA, Schifferdecker C, Driscoll DF, Benotti PN, Bistrian BR. Postoperative fluid overload: not a benign problem. Crit Care Med. 1990 Jul;18(7):728-33. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199007000-00010.
PMID: 2364713BACKGROUNDHolte K, Jensen P, Kehlet H. Physiologic effects of intravenous fluid administration in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2003 May;96(5):1504-1509. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000055820.56129.EE.
PMID: 12707158BACKGROUNDBouchard JE, Mehta RL. Fluid balance issues in the critically ill patient. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;164:69-78. doi: 10.1159/000313722. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
PMID: 20427995BACKGROUNDSimmons RS, Berdine GG, Seidenfeld JJ, Prihoda TJ, Harris GD, Smith JD, Gilbert TJ, Mota E, Johanson WG Jr. Fluid balance and the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Apr;135(4):924-9. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1987.135.4.924.
PMID: 3565940BACKGROUNDRahbari NN, Zimmermann JB, Schmidt T, Koch M, Weigand MA, Weitz J. Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2009 Apr;96(4):331-41. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6552.
PMID: 19283742BACKGROUNDKocian P, Neumann J, Majtan P, Hoch J. [Fluid therapy and surgical outcomes after low anterior resection]. Rozhl Chir. 2014 Sep;93(9):463-7. Czech.
PMID: 25301345BACKGROUNDBrandstrup B. Fluid therapy for the surgical patient. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun;20(2):265-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2005.10.007.
PMID: 16850777BACKGROUNDNisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2005 Jul;103(1):25-32. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00008.
PMID: 15983453BACKGROUNDHolte K, Klarskov B, Christensen DS, Lund C, Nielsen KG, Bie P, Kehlet H. Liberal versus restrictive fluid administration to improve recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, double-blind study. Ann Surg. 2004 Nov;240(5):892-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000143269.96649.3b.
PMID: 15492573BACKGROUNDChowdhury AH, Cox EF, Francis ST, Lobo DN. A randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover study on the effects of 1-L infusions of 6% hydroxyethyl starch suspended in 0.9% saline (voluven) and a balanced solution (Plasma Volume Redibag) on blood volume, renal blood flow velocity, and renal cortical tissue perfusion in healthy volunteers. Ann Surg. 2014 May;259(5):881-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000324.
PMID: 24253140RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Radovan Uvizl
University Hospital Olomouc
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Radovan Uvizl, MD, Ph.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2016
First Posted
February 25, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 9, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share