NCT02816463

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the leak pressure of the recently introduced laryngeal mask airway, Ambu AuraGain performs superior to the established laryngeal mask LMA Supreme in surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia. This leak pressure is the pressure at which a gas leaks around the airway, which is a key marker of efficacy and safety of its use; a higher leak pressure suggests a better seal between the artificial airway and patient's airway.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
170

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2016

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 22, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2016

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 9, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 9, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

June 6, 2017

Status Verified

June 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

June 22, 2016

Last Update Submit

June 5, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) for each airway device after insertion

    OLP is defined as 'the anesthesia circuit pressure at which a gas leak occurs around the SAD'.

    Within 2-3 minutes after laryngeal mask insertion before start of surgery.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Phrayngolaryngeal complications

    at 1 hr, 2hr and 24 hrs after the surgery

  • Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

    at 1 hr, 2hr and 24 hrs after the surgery

  • Satisfaction of patient and the anesthesiologist with the device

    After 1hr in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU)

Study Arms (2)

Ambu AuraGain (Group A)

EXPERIMENTAL

Laryngeal mask Ambu AuraGain will be used, and oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) after insertion will be recorded as the primary outcome measure

Device: Ambu AuraGain

LMA Supreme (Group S)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Laryngeal mask Supreme will be used, and oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) after insertion will be recorded as the primary outcome measure

Device: LMA Supreme

Interventions

Ambu AuraGain (Group A)
LMA Supreme (Group S)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA physical status I to III Adults more above 18 years Ambulatory surgeries under general anesthesia in supine position requiring laryngeal masks- Knee arthroscopies, bladder tumour resections, hand, eye and general surgical procedures Muscle relaxant not required

You may not qualify if:

  • Reduced mouth opening less than 2.5 cms Recent upper respiratory tract infection and sore throat in last 2 weeks Contraindications to laryngeal mask use as in morbid obesity- BMI more than 40 and severe symptomatic esophageal reflux disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Wong DT, Ooi A, Singh KP, Dallaire A, Meliana V, Lau J, Chung F, Singh M, Wong J. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between the Ambu(R) AuraGain and the LMA(R) Supreme supraglottic airways: a randomized-controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Jul;65(7):797-805. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1120-4. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

Study Officials

  • David T Wong, MD

    Uinversity Health Network (UHN), Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2016

First Posted

June 28, 2016

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion

May 9, 2017

Study Completion

May 9, 2017

Last Updated

June 6, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations