Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Personalized Prediction and Adaptation Tools in Psychotherapy
1 other identifier
interventional
423
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The research project investigates in a randomized controlled trial the effectiveness as well as moderating and mediating factors of psychometric feedback to therapists. In the intended study a total of 423 patients, who applied for a cognitive-behavioral therapy at the psychotherapy clinic of the University Trier and suffer from a depressive and/or an anxiety disorder (SCID-interviews), will be included. The patients will be randomly assigned either to one therapist as well as to one of two intervention groups (CG, IG2). An additional intervention group (IG1) will be generated from an existing archivale data set via propensity score matching. Patients of the control group (CG; n = 85) will be monitored concerning psychological impairment but therapists will not be provided with any feedback about the patients assessments. In both intervention groups (IG1: n = 169; IG2: n = 169) the therapists are provided with feedback about the patients self-evaluation in a computerized feedback portal. Therapists of the IG2 will additionally be provided with clinical support tools, which will be developed in this project, on the basis of existing systems. Therapists will also be provided with a personalized treatment recommendation based on similar patients (Nearest Neighbors) at the beginning of treatment. Besides the general effectiveness of feedback and the clinical support tools for negatively developing patients, further mediating and moderating variables on this feedback effect should be examined: treatment length, frequency of feedback use, therapist effects, therapist's experience, attitude towards feedback as well as congruence of therapist's and patient's evaluation concerning the progress. Additional procedures will be implemented to assess treatment adherence as well as the reliability of diagnosis and to include it into the analyses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedApril 28, 2021
April 1, 2021
2.5 years
March 30, 2017
April 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in 11-item Short version of Hopkins' Symptom Checklist (HSCL-11; Lutz, Tholen, Schürch, & Berking, 2006)
The mean of the HSCL-11 is used as the main outcome measure administered before each session.
through study completion, an average of 50 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-30; Lambert et al., 1996)
through study completion, an average of 50 weeks
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001)
through study completion, an average of 50 weeks
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7; Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, & Löwe, 2006)
through study completion, an average of 50 weeks
Change in the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI; Franke, 2000)
through study completion, an average of 50 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Cognitive Behavior Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORCognitive Behavioral Therapy without psychometric Feedback.
CBT plus Feedback
EXPERIMENTALCognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) with Psychometric Feedback
CBT plus Feedback plus CST
EXPERIMENTALCognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) with Psychometric Feedback and Clinical Support Tools (CST)
Interventions
Treatments are conducted by cognitive-behavioral therapists in training with different levels of experience as well as licensed cognitive-behavioral therapists with several years of experience. The treatment approach is based on cognitive-behavioral manuals and principles.
Therapists of the IG1 are provided with information about the initial status concerning symptoms (BSI \& OQ-30), interpersonal functioning (IIP-32 \& OQ-30) as well as diagnoses specific symptoms (GAD-7 or PHQ-9). Beside the status measures, also individual progress information on the symptom level (HSCL-11 each session) is provided to the therapist. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of personalized prediction and adaptation tools on treatment outcome in outpatient psychotherapy. This group is a matched sample.
Additional to the intervention group "CBT and Feedback" therapists will be provided with additional clinical support tools (CST) which are designed to facilitate treatment selection and treatment adaptation. The causes of deterioration will be assessed and therapists will be provided with additional treatment recommendations and material to help preventing treatment failure for a specific patient. During treatment the clinical support tools will be provided in the problem fields: risk/suicidality, motivation / treatment goals, therapeutic relationship, social support / critical life events, and emotion regulation / self regulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- One anxiety and/or depressive disorder (ICD-10: F32, F33, F40, F41, F42, F43)
- At least 3 treatment sessions
You may not qualify if:
- Organic, including symptomatic mental disorders (ICD-10: F00-F09)
- Mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substances (ICD-10: F10-F19)
- Schizophrenia, schizotypal, and delusional disorders (ICD-10: F20-F29)
- Acute suicidality
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Trierlead
- German Research Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Trier
Trier, Rhineland-Palatinate, 54296, Germany
Related Publications (3)
Lutz W, De Jong K, Rubel J. Patient-focused and feedback research in psychotherapy: Where are we and where do we want to go? Psychother Res. 2015;25(6):625-32. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1079661. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
PMID: 26376225BACKGROUNDLutz W, Rubel J, Schiefele AK, Zimmermann D, Bohnke JR, Wittmann WW. Feedback and therapist effects in the context of treatment outcome and treatment length. Psychother Res. 2015;25(6):647-60. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1053553. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
PMID: 26218788BACKGROUNDLutz W, Zimmermann D, Muller VNLS, Deisenhofer AK, Rubel JA. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of personalized prediction and adaptation tools on treatment outcome in outpatient psychotherapy: study protocol. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 24;17(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1464-2.
PMID: 28836954DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wolfgang Lutz, Prof. Dr.
University of Trier
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Lutz
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2017
First Posted
April 11, 2017
Study Start
April 15, 2017
Primary Completion
October 15, 2019
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
April 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share