NCT03022071

Brief Summary

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent psychiatric condition associated with significant disability, mortality and economic burden. MDD is ranked fourth in terms of disease burden as defined by the World Health Organization (2001). Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (PDT) are found to be equally effective for patients with depression. However, many patients do not respond sufficiently to treatment and relapse rates are high. To be able to offer individualized treatment, a clinically important question is therefore whether some patients profit more from one of the two therapies. At present little is known on which patient characteristics (moderators) may be associated with differential outcomes of CBT and PDT and through what kind of therapeutic processes and mechanisms (mediators) improvements occur in each therapy mode. There are actually only theoretical assumptions sparsely supported by research findings on what moderates and mediates the treatment effects of CBT and PDT. Aims: The overall aim of this project is to examine putative moderators and mediators in CBT and PDT and develop more basic knowledge about their impact on outcomes of psychotherapy for patients with MDD. Methods and study design: The study is a randomized clinical trial. One hundred patients will be randomized to one of two treatment conditions. The patients will be treated over 28 weeks with either CBT (one weekly session over 16 weeks and 3 booster sessions (monthly) during the rest of the 28 week study period) or PDT (one weekly session in 28 weeks). The patients will be evaluated at baseline, during therapy, at the end of therapy, and at follow-up investigations 1 and 3 years after treatment termination. The outcome measures comprise a large range of clinical and process variables, including assessment tools measuring specific preselected putative moderators and mediators. Discussion: The clinical outcome of this trial may guide clinicians to decide what kind of treatment should be offered the individual patient. Moreover, it will shed light on what kind of mechanisms in psychotherapy that is followed by symptom improvement and increased psychosocial functioning.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable depression

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable depression

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 14, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 16, 2017

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2017

Completed
6.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 20, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6.4 years

First QC Date

November 14, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 17, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Cognitive behavior therapyPsychodynamic therapyMediatorsModerators

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

    Assessment of depression

    Change in scores between baseline and 28 weeks (end of therapy) and change between baseline and one and three year follow-up

  • Beck Depression Index

    Assessment of depression

    Change in scores between baseline and 28 weeks (end of therapy) and change between baseline and one and three year follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Psychodynamic Functioning Scale

    Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)

  • Beck Cognitive Insight Score

    Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)

  • Global Assesment of Functioning

    Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)

  • Inventory of Interpersonal Problems

    Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)

  • Reflective functioning - depression

    Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (10)

  • Work and Social Adjustment Scale

    Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)

  • The Short Form Health Survey

    Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)

  • Childhood Trauma Questionnaire

    Baseline (inclusion). Moderator of treatment

  • +7 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Cognitive behavior therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

The included patients will receive cognitive therapy for depression for 16 weeks and monthly booster sessions up to 28 weeks.

Other: Cognitive behavior therapy

Psychodynamic psychotherapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The included patients will receive time-limited psychodynamic psychotherapy for 28 weeks.

Other: Cognitive behavior therapy

Interventions

In this study we want to compare CBT and PDT and examine whether some patients will benefit from CBT and other from PDT. More specifically we want to examine moderators and mediators for improvement in depressive symptoms in the two interventions arms.

Also known as: Psychodynamic psychotherapy
Cognitive behavior therapyPsychodynamic psychotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged between 18-65 years, with depressive disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) unipolar MDD diagnosis will be included.MINI plus (Sheehan et al., 1998 will be used as assessment tool. Comorbidity is expected to be frequent. Written consent will be obtained from all patients.
  • The participants need to have the ability to speak and understand a Scandinavian language, and willingness and ability to give informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Current or past neurological illness, traumatic brain injury, current alcohol and/or substance dependency disorders, psychotic disorders, developmental disorders, and mental retardation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oslo University Hospital

Oslo, Oslo County, 0407, Norway

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Malkomsen A, Wilberg T, Bull-Hansen B, Dammen T, Evensen JH, Hummelen B, Lovgren A, Osnes K, Ulberg R, Rossberg JI. Comparative effectiveness of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for major depression in psychiatric outpatient clinics: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 11;25(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06544-6.

  • Malkomsen A, Rossberg JI, Dammen T, Wilberg T, Lovgren A, Ulberg R, Evensen J. How therapists in cognitive behavioral and psychodynamic therapy reflect upon the use of metaphors in therapy: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04083-y.

  • Malkomsen A, Rossberg JI, Dammen T, Wilberg T, Lovgren A, Ulberg R, Evensen J. Digging down or scratching the surface: how patients use metaphors to describe their experiences of psychotherapy. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03551-1.

  • Rossberg JI, Evensen J, Dammen T, Wilberg T, Klungsoyr O, Jones M, Boen E, Egeland R, Breivik R, Lovgren A, Ulberg R. Mechanisms of change and heterogeneous treatment effects in psychodynamic and cognitive behavioural therapy for patients with depressive disorder: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychol. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00517-6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depression

Interventions

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychotherapy, Psychodynamic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • Jan I Røssberg, phD

    Oslo University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcome assessments will be provided by raters blinded to the randomization
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: In this study we want to examine moderators and mediators in two equally effective, well known psychotherapeutic treatments (Psychodynamic and cognitive behavior therapy)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor MD PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2016

First Posted

January 16, 2017

Study Start

February 1, 2017

Primary Completion

June 30, 2023

Study Completion

June 30, 2023

Last Updated

March 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2021-09

Locations