NCT03098394

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of utilizing a rapid turnaround CT/NG test on treatment of female patients in the emergency department or urgent care setting with possible STIs.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 27, 2017

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 31, 2017

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 24, 2018

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 25, 2022

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 20, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 31, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

March 27, 2017

Results QC Date

June 20, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 8, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Rapid turnaround testRTATGonorrheaChlamydiaSTI

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants Treated With Antibiotics

    Evaluate the effect of a rapid turnaround CT/NG test compared to standard of care on antibiotic prescription for female patients with STI.

    7 days

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Length of Stay (Minutes)

    7 days

  • Percentage of Patients With Rapid Turnaround CT/NG (RPAT) Tests That Are CONSISTENT With Usual Care Test (PCR) in Subjects That Had Both Performed.

    7 days

  • Healthcare Costs.

    7 days

  • Average Score for Patient Satisfaction With Provider Explanation.

    7 days

  • Average Score for Patient Satisfaction With Treatment Effectiveness.

    7 days

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Rapid Turnaround Test

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients randomized to this arm will be tested for a sexually transmitted infection (STI) with both the rapid nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) as well as the conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. The results from the rapid turnaround test will guide providers on treatment decisions for a possible STI. The results from the PCR test will be used to verify the results of the rapid turnaround test.

Device: Cepheid Xpert CT/NG Rapid Turnaround TestDevice: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Usual Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized to this arm will be tested for a sexually transmitted infection (STI) using the conventional PCR test. The results from the PCR test normally take approximately 48-72 hours and these patients will likely receive treatment based on the decision of the clinical provider. The results from the PCR test will be used to verify the decision of the clinical provider to treat or withhold treatment for a possible STI.

Device: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Interventions

This diagnostic test will be used to help clinicians determine the need for antibiotic prescriptions in patients with a suspected sexually tract infection.

Also known as: GeneXpert
Rapid Turnaround Test

This is the standard of care for diagnosis of a suspected sexually transmitted infection.

Also known as: PCR
Rapid Turnaround TestUsual Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsParticipant eligibility is not based on self-representation of gender identity. All participants in this study will receive a pelvic exam in the emergency department as well as a cervical swab for diagnostic testing.
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female patients age 18-55
  • Signs or symptoms consistent with sexually transmitted infection
  • Medical provider willing to consider the result of the rapid turnaround test in decision to treat for gonorrhea/chlamydia
  • Must have a urine specimen obtained and a pelvic exam performed as part of the anticipated standard of care evaluation
  • Provides informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Signs of systemic infection
  • Patient in whom the provider is unwilling to consider the result of the rapid turnaround test
  • Patient who reports being treated for either gonorrhea or chlamydia in the preceding 3 months
  • Patients undergoing evaluation for sexual assault
  • Patients that are known to be pregnant or express concern that they may be pregnant
  • Incarcerated patients
  • Students/Employees of the facility

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Maryland Medical Systems

Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Brook G. The performance of non-NAAT point-of-care (POC) tests and rapid NAAT tests for chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections. An assessment of currently available assays. Sex Transm Infect. 2015 Dec;91(8):539-44. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051997. Epub 2015 May 2.

    PMID: 25935930BACKGROUND
  • Gaydos CA. Review of use of a new rapid real-time PCR, the Cepheid GeneXpert(R) (Xpert) CT/NG assay, for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: results for patients while in a clinical setting. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2014 Mar;14(2):135-7. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2014.871495. Epub 2014 Jan 23.

    PMID: 24450867BACKGROUND
  • Gaydos CA, Van Der Pol B, Jett-Goheen M, Barnes M, Quinn N, Clark C, Daniel GE, Dixon PB, Hook EW 3rd; CT/NG Study Group. Performance of the Cepheid CT/NG Xpert Rapid PCR Test for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1666-72. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03461-12. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

    PMID: 23467600BACKGROUND
  • Holley CE, Van Pham T, Mezzadra HM, Willis GC, Witting MD. Overtreatment of gonorrhea and chlamydial infections in 2 inner-city emergency departments. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;33(9):1265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 12.

    PMID: 26119905BACKGROUND
  • Newman LM, Moran JS, Workowski KA. Update on the management of gonorrhea in adults in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Apr 1;44 Suppl 3:S84-101. doi: 10.1086/511422.

    PMID: 17342672BACKGROUND
  • Tabrizi SN, Unemo M, Golparian D, Twin J, Limnios AE, Lahra M, Guy R; TTANGO Investigators. Analytical evaluation of GeneXpert CT/NG, the first genetic point-of-care assay for simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1945-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00806-13. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

    PMID: 23554203BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sexually Transmitted DiseasesGonorrheaChlamydia Infections

Interventions

Polymerase Chain Reaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Communicable DiseasesInfectionsGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeisseriaceae InfectionsGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsBacterial InfectionsBacterial Infections and MycosesSexually Transmitted Diseases, BacterialChlamydiaceae Infections

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Nucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesGenetic TechniquesInvestigative Techniques

Limitations and Caveats

Early termination leading to small numbers of subjects enrolled

Results Point of Contact

Title
Richard Gentry Wilkerson
Organization
University of Maryland School of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Richard G Wilkerson, MD

    University of Maryland, Baltimore

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Participants, investigators, and care providers will be masked to the experimental or control arm prior to enrollment in the study. Once the participant has been enrolled in the study, they will be randomized to either the control arm or the experimental arm. Once randomization has occurred, participants, care providers, and the investigators will know which group the participants are in.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a prospective, non-blinded, randomized clinical control trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2017

First Posted

March 31, 2017

Study Start

September 24, 2018

Primary Completion

March 25, 2022

Study Completion

June 20, 2023

Last Updated

August 31, 2023

Results First Posted

August 31, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

We do not plan on sharing any individual participant data with other researchers

Locations