Repeat Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Patients: Tailored Socio-Contextual Intervention to Reduce HIV Risk
Repeat STI Patients: Tailored Socio-Contextual Intervention to Reduce HIV Risk
2 other identifiers
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
People who present repeatedly at Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) clinics represent a key population for HIV prevention intervention research. Despite their heightened risk there is an absence of empirical research on strategies to intervene with repeat STI. Some STI-clinic based behavioral HIV prevention studies, focusing on the general STI patient population, have found that risk reduction interventions can reduce the incidence of a subsequent STI. Studies have shown that expedited treatment for STI patients' partners can reduce subsequent STI and enhancing partner notification can reduce risk for repeat infection. Those who go on to experience repeat infections, after they are provided with risk reduction services, are the focus of this project. Repeat STI literature noted, there have been no intervention studies conducted to lower STI/HIV risk specifically among people who are presenting with repeat STI. The proposed study develops a risk reduction intervention designed for STI repeaters and evaluates the efficacy of this intervention and its cost-effectiveness. The investigators expect that the intervention for STI repeaters will be significantly more effective than standard care with regard to reducing participants' STI/HIV risks. However, even a highly-effective intervention is unlikely to be adopted if the outcomes come at a high cost. Administrators need to know how effective a "new" intervention is, but also if it is more cost-effective than the program it replaces. Cost-effectiveness information also is critical to justify the "new" intervention to prevention funders (Milwaukee Department of Health), who are concerned not only with costs and effects, but also with the tradeoff between them. The proposed study will provide the comprehensive level of information about intervention effects and cost-effectiveness required by administrators and resource allocation decision makers to determine whether or not to fund or implement the intervention. Hypothesis 1. The investigators expect a greater reduction in unprotected vaginal and anal intercourse in the prevention case management compared to the standard care condition. Hypothesis 2. The hypothesis that the case management group will have a lower STI re-infection rate compared to the standard care group will be tested using each participant's repeat STI status over the 12 month FU period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 27, 2017
October 1, 2017
3.2 years
January 5, 2012
October 25, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
STI Outcome Measures
Investigators wish to assess if patients contracted repeat STIs during the study. 1. Investigators will conduct STI clinic chart abstraction at 12-months post-enrollment to record subsequent episodes of STIs. Because the Milwaukee Health Department electronic STDMIS System includes data from CDC reportable tests conducted elsewhere, investigators will record STIs diagnosed at other sites. 2. Investigators will test for these STIs and HIV at the 12 month follow up visit. 3. Investigators will ask patients to report other STI diagnosed anywhere during the period.
12 month follow up visit
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Health-Related Quality of Life
Baseline, 4, 8, 12 month follow ups
Social Action Theory-Based Outcome Mediators
Baseline, 4, 8, 12 month follow ups
Contextual factors - demographic variables
Baseline, 4, 8, 12 month follow ups
STI Risk Behavior Assessment
Baseline, 4, 8, 12 month follow ups
Contextual factors - general life context
Baseline, 4, 8, 12 month follow ups
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Tailored Socio-Contextual Intervention
EXPERIMENTAL1. Develop strengths based case management intervention using input from interviews with repeat STI patients, consultants, \& piloting. 2. Recruit/enroll in the intervention 500 subjects (50% women; African American focus). 3. After subjects receive STI diagnosis, treatment,\& partner notification services, randomly assign subjects to: A. The STI strengths-based prevention case management, or B. Standard care. 4. Assess participants' risk behavior, determinants of behavior \& quality of life. Investigators will assess the incidence of new STI \& test the efficacy of the intervention relative to control. 5. Conduct a qualitative evaluation. Investigators will sample repeaters and non-repeaters from the experimental group. 6. Conduct cost effectiveness analyses of intervention compared to the standard.
Standard of Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORCurrently, the total time spent in an STI exam w/men is 30 minutes \& 60 w/women. More time is devoted to patients with sexual assault hx. Reason for the visit, symptoms, STI hx, contraception, condom use, number/gender of partners \& number/type of sexual activities are assessed. The nurse takes a health hx and asks about typical HIV risks behavior. Due to time the risk assessment is 5 minutes. A risk reduction kit including condoms is issued. Information includes symptoms/treatment of STI, location of sexual health clinics, location of free condoms \& testing/treatment resources. Referral information is provided when needed \& more involved w/sexual assault survivors. Partner notification is conducted w/syphilis and HIV. This didactic process follows the medical model.
Interventions
1. Develop strengths based case management intervention using input from interviews with repeat STI patients, consultants, \& piloting. 2. Recruit/enroll in the intervention 500 subjects (50% women; African American focus). 3. After subjects receive STI diagnosis, treatment,\& partner notification services, randomly assign subjects to: A. The STI strengths-based prevention case management, or B. Standard care. 4. Assess participants' risk behavior, determinants of behavior \& quality of life. Investigators will assess the incidence of new STI \& test the efficacy of the intervention relative to control. 5. Conduct a qualitative evaluation. Investigators will sample repeaters and non-repeaters from the experimental group. 6. Conduct cost effectiveness analyses of intervention compared to the standard.
Currently, the total time spent in an STI exam w/men is 30 minutes \& 60 w/women. More time is devoted to patients with sexual assault hx. Reason for the visit, symptoms, STI hx, contraception, condom use, number/gender of partners \& number/type of sexual activities are assessed. The nurse takes a health hx and asks about typical HIV risks behavior. Due to time the risk assessment is 5 minutes. A risk reduction kit including condoms is issued. Information includes symptoms/treatment of STI, location of sexual health clinics, location of free condoms \& testing/treatment resources. Referral information is provided when needed \& more involved w/sexual assault survivors. Partner notification is conducted w/syphilis and HIV. This didactic process follows the medical model.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age of 18 or older;
- Presentation for diagnosis of STI;
- Previous bacterial STI diagnosis in the clinic more than 30 days ago and within the past 12 months;
- No HIV-positive test result in the past; and
- Written informed consent for participation.
You may not qualify if:
- Not 18 or older;
- Does not present for STI diagnosis;
- No previous bacterial STI diagnosis in the clinic more than 30 days ago and within the past 12 months;
- HIV-positive test result in the past; or
- No written informed consent for participation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee - Zilber School of Public Health
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53201, United States
Related Publications (21)
Carey MP, Carey KB, Maisto SA, Gordon CM, Weinhardt LS. Assessing sexual risk behaviour with the Timeline Followback (TLFB) approach: continued development and psychometric evaluation with psychiatric outpatients. Int J STD AIDS. 2001 Jun;12(6):365-75. doi: 10.1258/0956462011923309.
PMID: 11368817BACKGROUNDEllen JM, Gaydos C, Chung SE, Willard N, Lloyd LV, Rietmeijer CA. Sex partner selection, social networks, and repeat sexually transmitted infections in young men: a preliminary report. Sex Transm Dis. 2006 Jan;33(1):18-21. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000187213.07551.a6.
PMID: 16385217BACKGROUNDEwart CK. Social action theory for a public health psychology. Am Psychol. 1991 Sep;46(9):931-46. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.46.9.931.
PMID: 1958012BACKGROUNDFortenberry JD, Brizendine EJ, Katz BP, Wools KK, Blythe MJ, Orr DP. Subsequent sexually transmitted infections among adolescent women with genital infection due to Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, or Trichomonas vaginalis. Sex Transm Dis. 1999 Jan;26(1):26-32. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199901000-00005.
PMID: 9918320BACKGROUNDGolden MR, Whittington WL, Handsfield HH, Hughes JP, Stamm WE, Hogben M, Clark A, Malinski C, Helmers JR, Thomas KK, Holmes KK. Effect of expedited treatment of sex partners on recurrent or persistent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 17;352(7):676-85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041681.
PMID: 15716561BACKGROUNDGorsky RD. A method to measure the costs of counseling for HIV prevention. Public Health Rep. 1996;111 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):115-22.
PMID: 8862166BACKGROUNDGunn RA, Fitzgerald S, Aral SO. Sexually transmitted disease clinic clients at risk for subsequent gonorrhea and chlamydia infections: possible 'core' transmitters. Sex Transm Dis. 2000 Jul;27(6):343-9. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200007000-00008.
PMID: 10907910BACKGROUNDHall JM, Stevens PE. Rigor in feminist research. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1991 Mar;13(3):16-29. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199103000-00005.
PMID: 1901470BACKGROUNDHoltgrave DR, Pinkerton SD. Updates of cost of illness and quality of life estimates for use in economic evaluations of HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1997 Sep 1;16(1):54-62. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199709010-00009.
PMID: 9377126BACKGROUNDMacias C, Farley OW, Jackson R, Kinney R. Case management in the context of capitation financing: an evaluation of the strengths model. Adm Policy Ment Health. 1997 Jul;24(6):535-43. doi: 10.1007/BF02042831. No abstract available.
PMID: 9385717BACKGROUNDMosack KE, Weinhardt LS, Kelly JA, Gore-Felton C, McAuliffe TL, Johnson MO, Remien RH, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Ehrhardt AA, Chesney MA, Morin SF. Influence of coping, social support, and depression on subjective health status among HIV-positive adults with different sexual identities. Behav Med. 2009 Winter;34(4):133-44. doi: 10.3200/BMED.34.4.133-144.
PMID: 19064372BACKGROUNDOrr DP, Johnston K, Brizendine E, Katz B, Fortenberry JD. Subsequent sexually transmitted infection in urban adolescents and young adults. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Aug;155(8):947-53. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.8.947.
PMID: 11483124BACKGROUNDPinkerton SD, Holtgrave DR, DiFranceisco W, Semaan S, Coyle SL, Johnson-Masotti AP. Cost-threshold analyses of the National AIDS Demonstration Research HIV prevention interventions. AIDS. 2000 Jun 16;14(9):1257-68. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200006160-00024.
PMID: 10894291BACKGROUNDWeinhardt LS, Galvao LW, Stevens PE, Masanjala WH, Bryant C, Ng'ombe T. Broadening research on microfinance and related strategies for HIV prevention: commentary on Dworkin and Blankenship (2009). AIDS Behav. 2009 Jun;13(3):470-3. doi: 10.1007/s10461-009-9561-y. Epub 2009 Apr 11. No abstract available.
PMID: 19363651BACKGROUNDWeinhardt LS, Mosack KE, Swain GR. Development of a computer-based risk-reduction counseling intervention: acceptability and preferences among low-income patients at an urban sexually transmitted infection clinic. AIDS Behav. 2007 Jul;11(4):549-56. doi: 10.1007/s10461-006-9163-x. Epub 2006 Sep 22.
PMID: 17028993BACKGROUNDWeinhardt LS, Kelly JA, Brondino MJ, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Kirshenbaum SB, Chesney MA, Remien RH, Morin SF, Lightfoot M, Ehrhardt AA, Johnson MO, Catz SL, Pinkerton SD, Benotsch EG, Hong D, Gore-Felton C; National Institute of Mental Health Healthy Living Project Team. HIV transmission risk behavior among men and women living with HIV in 4 cities in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004 Aug 15;36(5):1057-66. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200408150-00009.
PMID: 15247559BACKGROUNDShain RN, Piper JM, Newton ER, Perdue ST, Ramos R, Champion JD, Guerra FA. A randomized, controlled trial of a behavioral intervention to prevent sexually transmitted disease among minority women. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 14;340(2):93-100. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901143400203.
PMID: 9887160BACKGROUNDHosenfeld CB, Workowski KA, Berman S, Zaidi A, Dyson J, Mosure D, Bolan G, Bauer HM. Repeat infection with Chlamydia and gonorrhea among females: a systematic review of the literature. Sex Transm Dis. 2009 Aug;36(8):478-89. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181a2a933.
PMID: 19617871BACKGROUNDWarner L, Klausner JD, Rietmeijer CA, Malotte CK, O'Donnell L, Margolis AD, Greenwood GL, Richardson D, Vrungos S, O'Donnell CR, Borkowf CB; Safe in the City Study Group. Effect of a brief video intervention on incident infection among patients attending sexually transmitted disease clinics. PLoS Med. 2008 Jun 24;5(6):e135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050135.
PMID: 18578564BACKGROUNDFisher JD, Fisher WA. Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychol Bull. 1992 May;111(3):455-74. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.455.
PMID: 1594721BACKGROUNDCutrona CE. Ratings of social support by adolescents and adult informants: degree of correspondence and prediction of depressive symptoms. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Oct;57(4):723-30. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.4.723.
PMID: 2795439BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lance S Weinhardt, PhD
UW Milwaukee Zilber School of Public Health & Medical College of Wisconsin Center for AIDS Intervention Research
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Community and Behavioral Health Promotion
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2012
First Posted
January 16, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10