Study Stopped
Difficulties in recruiting of suitable patients, bad compliance of patients
Alveolar Management Following Teeth Extraction
A Method for Measuring Volume Changes of the Alveolar Ridge During Dental Implantation Using 3D Scanning
2 other identifiers
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Investigation of the volume stability of the alveolar ridge, the bone structure and soft tissue appearance at a delayed dental implantation using two bone substitute materials (1. Human-Spongiosa, gefriergetrocknet, CHB; 2. collacone®)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started May 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 14, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 8, 2023
CompletedJuly 17, 2023
July 1, 2023
5.7 years
February 27, 2017
July 13, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Extent of bone resorption
The main objective is to measure the extent of resorption of the alveolar ridge bone following teeth extraction and alveolar management (socket preservation) and to compare the two authorized bone substitute materials: 1. Human Spongiosa, gefriergetrocknet, CHB + mucoderm® and 2. collacone® + mucoderm® through 3D surface scan. Definition of time points: T-1 = baseline T2 = 1 month after extraction T3 = 4.5 months after extraction = time point of implantation T5 = 1 month after implantation T6 = 3 months after implantation T7 = 6 months after implantation T8 = 9 months after implantation
According to E9 guideline, the assumptions of the sample size calculation and the statistical analysis plan, which was approved by PEI we include "all relevant time points", respective: T-1 (baseline), T2, T3, T5, T6, T7, T8 (see definition above)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Implants stability
4.5 months after teeth extraction and socket preservation (T3) and 3 months after implantation (T6)
Pink Esthetic Score
T-1 (baseline before teeth extraction), T1 (7-10 days after extraction), T2 (1 month after extraction), T3 (time of implantation; 4.5 months after extraction), T5, T6, T7 and T8 (respective 1, 3, 6 and 9 months after implantation)
Histologic bone investigation
4.5 months after teeth extraction and socket preservation (T3)
Study Arms (2)
Human-Spongiosa (IMP: drug)
ACTIVE COMPARATORProduct Name: Human-Spongiosa,gefriergetrocknet, CHB / Pharmaceutical form: Granules / Routes of Administration: Dental use / Marketing authorisation number : 3004134.00.00 / Marketing Authorisation Holder: Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Tissue bank, Charité university of medicine Berlin / Used by socket preservation
collacone® (IMP: medical device)
ACTIVE COMPARATORProduct Name: Collacone / Pharmaceutical form: Absorbable, local Hemostat, porcine collagen / Routes of Administration: Dental use / Medical device with a CE mark / Used by socket preservation
Interventions
after tooth extraction, the dental alveolus is filled with the bone substitute material (Human-Spongiosa) and covered with a membrane (mucoderm®)
after tooth extraction, the dental alveolus is filled with the bone substitute material (collacone®) and covered with a membrane (mucoderm®)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent
- Indication for tooth extraction resulting in a edentulous gap
- Male and female patients with an age range 20-60 years
- Caucasian
- For female patients: a negative pregnancy test
- Normotonic blood pressure (according to the WHO definition):
- Men: 110/70 - 140/90 mm Hg
- Women: 100/60- 140/90mm Hg
You may not qualify if:
- Parallel implantation of another implant
- Parallel planned prosthetic restoration of the adjacent teeth
- Smoker (less than 5 years non-smoker)
- Nursing women
- Intake of bisphosphonates
- Radiation therapy (medical history or current)
- Known Diabetes mellitus
- Inflammatory processes in the mouth (PSI\> 2)
- Presence of autoimmune diseases (Rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome, Systemic lupus erythematosus)
- Presence of blood coagulation disorders (Haemophilia A/B), or the intake of anticoagulants (Warfarin, new oral anticoagulants, aspirin\> 100 mg)
- Osteogenesis imperfecta
- Osteoporosis
- Leukemia
- Agranulocytosis
- Immunocompromised patients
- +11 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Medicine Greifswaldlead
- Botiss Medical AGcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Medicine Greifswald - Department for oral and maxillofacial Surgery
Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 17475, Germany
Related Publications (29)
Covani U, Ricci M, Bozzolo G, Mangano F, Zini A, Barone A. Analysis of the pattern of the alveolar ridge remodelling following single tooth extraction. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Aug;22(8):820-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02060.x. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
PMID: 21198897BACKGROUNDMorjaria KR, Wilson R, Palmer RM. Bone healing after tooth extraction with or without an intervention: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Feb;16(1):1-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00450.x. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
PMID: 22405099BACKGROUNDFiorellini JP, Howell TH, Cochran D, Malmquist J, Lilly LC, Spagnoli D, Toljanic J, Jones A, Nevins M. Randomized study evaluating recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for extraction socket augmentation. J Periodontol. 2005 Apr;76(4):605-13. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.605.
PMID: 15857102BACKGROUNDKernan WN, Viscoli CM, Makuch RW, Brass LM, Horwitz RI. Stratified randomization for clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Jan;52(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00138-3.
PMID: 9973070BACKGROUNDHarrell FE, Jr. Regression Modeling Strategies. With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Springer; 2015
BACKGROUNDSchafer JL, Graham JW. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002 Jun;7(2):147-77.
PMID: 12090408BACKGROUNDCardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Sep;30(9):809-18. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00366.x.
PMID: 12956657BACKGROUNDSchwarz F, Rothamel D, Ferrari D, Becker J. Aktuelle Aspekte zur Beeinflussung der Dimensionsveränderung des Alveolarknochens nach Zahnentfernung Implantologie 14 Vol 42006:319-333.
BACKGROUNDAmler MH. The time sequence of tissue regeneration in human extraction wounds. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969 Mar;27(3):309-18. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(69)90357-0. No abstract available.
PMID: 5251474BACKGROUNDKuboki Y, Hashimoto F, Ishibashi K. Time-dependent changes of collagen crosslinks in the socket after tooth extraction in rabbits. J Dent Res. 1988 Jun;67(6):944-8. doi: 10.1177/00220345880670061101.
PMID: 3170907BACKGROUNDLin WL, McCulloch CA, Cho MI. Differentiation of periodontal ligament fibroblasts into osteoblasts during socket healing after tooth extraction in the rat. Anat Rec. 1994 Dec;240(4):492-506. doi: 10.1002/ar.1092400407.
PMID: 7879901BACKGROUNDCardaropoli G, Araujo M, Hayacibara R, Sukekava F, Lindhe J. Healing of extraction sockets and surgically produced - augmented and non-augmented - defects in the alveolar ridge. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 May;32(5):435-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00692.x.
PMID: 15842256BACKGROUNDSchropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A, Isidor F. Clinical and radiographic performance of delayed-immediate single-tooth implant placement associated with peri-implant bone defects. A 2-year prospective, controlled, randomized follow-up report. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 May;32(5):480-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00699.x.
PMID: 15842263BACKGROUNDFickl S, Schneider D, Zuhr O, Hinze M, Ender A, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 May;36(5):442-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01381.x.
PMID: 19419446BACKGROUNDLundgren D, Sennerby L, Falk H, Friberg B, Nyman S. The use of a new bioresorbable barrier for guided bone regeneration in connection with implant installation. Case reports. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994 Sep;5(3):177-84. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050309.x.
PMID: 7827233BACKGROUNDPolson AM, Garrett S, Stoller NH, Greenstein G, Polson AP, Harrold CQ, Laster L. Guided tissue regeneration in human furcation defects after using a biodegradable barrier: a multi-center feasibility study. J Periodontol. 1995 May;66(5):377-85. doi: 10.1902/jop.1995.66.5.377.
PMID: 7623257BACKGROUNDLaurell L, Falk H, Fornell J, Johard G, Gottlow J. Clinical use of a bioresorbable matrix barrier in guided tissue regeneration therapy. Case series. J Periodontol. 1994 Oct;65(10):967-75. doi: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.10.967.
PMID: 7823279BACKGROUNDLekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, Nedic M. Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. J Periodontol. 1998 Sep;69(9):1044-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1044.
PMID: 9776033BACKGROUNDShakibiae M. Alveolenmanagement nach Zahnextraktion - Socket und Ridge Preservation. Dental Magazin Vol 22009:24-33.
BACKGROUNDHammerle CH, Jung RE, Yaman D, Lang NP. Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve consecutive cases. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jan;19(1):19-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01407.x. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
PMID: 17956571BACKGROUNDAraujo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: A 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):433-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01705.x.
PMID: 19522974BACKGROUNDMardas N, Chadha V, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jul;21(7):688-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01918.x.
PMID: 20636724BACKGROUNDNevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, Friedland B, Schenk RK, Parma-Benfenati S, Simion M, Tinti C, Wagenberg B. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006 Feb;26(1):19-29.
PMID: 16515093BACKGROUNDFriedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL, Reboussin DM, Granger CB. Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. 5th ed. Heidelberg: Springer; 2015.
BACKGROUNDGreenland S, Poole C. Living with p values: resurrecting a Bayesian perspective on frequentist statistics. Epidemiology. 2013 Jan;24(1):62-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182785741.
PMID: 23232611BACKGROUNDEnkling N, Bayer S, Johren P, Mericske-Stern R. Vinylsiloxanether: a new impression material. Clinical study of implant impressions with vinylsiloxanether versus polyether materials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Mar;14(1):144-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00240.x. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
PMID: 19793332BACKGROUNDFurhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
PMID: 16307569BACKGROUNDFeng SW, Chang WJ, Lin CT, Lee SY, Teng NC, Huang HM. Modal damping factor detected with an impulse-forced vibration method provides additional information on osseointegration during dental implant healing. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1333-40. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4038.
PMID: 26574858BACKGROUNDWitte F, Ulrich H, Palm C, Willbold E. Biodegradable magnesium scaffolds: Part II: peri-implant bone remodeling. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Jun 1;81(3):757-65. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31293.
PMID: 17390322BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Stefan Engeli, Prof.
University Greifswald, KKS
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- outcome assessors will be masked during the evaluation period. Subjects will be identified through their randomization number. Patients identification log is stored at the study site and only available to the investigator who is responsible of concealment of these information.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2017
First Posted
March 24, 2017
Study Start
May 2, 2016
Primary Completion
January 14, 2022
Study Completion
May 8, 2023
Last Updated
July 17, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will not be shared in accordance with medical data protection regulations.