Integration of Illness Management and Recovery Within ACT
ACT+IMR
1 other identifier
interventional
101
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Integrating Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) into Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) has great promise for improving the symptomatic, functional, and recovery outcomes for people with Serious Mental Illness (SMI), especially those individuals who have the greatest needs. In addition to these positive consumer outcomes, system benefits may also accrue due to more rapid graduation of consumers from ACT (with IMR) programs to less intensive levels of care. However, before these benefits can be realized, research and development are needed to design and pilot test a treatment manual that is feasible and acceptable to consumers and staff for integrating IMR and ACT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 7, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2017
CompletedMarch 9, 2017
March 1, 2017
3.8 years
March 3, 2017
March 8, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Illness Self-Management - The Clinician and Client Versions of the IMR Scale
evaluate illness self-management across 15 items rated on 5-point behaviorally anchored scales, with higher scores indicating better illness management. Overall scores are averages of the 15 items (ranging from 15 to 75).
baseline, 6, and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
baseline, 6, and 12 months
Daily Living Activities Scale (DLA-20), the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and the Quality of Life Scale-Abbreviated (QLSA)
baseline, 6, and 12 months
Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS)
baseline, 6, and 12 months
Community Integration Measure (CIM)
baseline, 6, and 12 months
Emergency mental health services
baseline, 6, and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) - Only
NO INTERVENTIONACT is a multidisciplinary, team-based approach to providing a range of treatment, rehabilitation, and support services to high-need, high-risk people with severe mental illness who tend not to use clinic-based services; most services are provided on an outreach basis (e.g., in the person's home) and services are available 24 /7(27).
Assertive Community Treatment+Illness Management and Recovery
EXPERIMENTALIMR follows a manualized curriculum to help clients pursue personal recovery goals and to teach them information, strategies, and skills over 11 modules (e.g., using medications, coping with stress) to manage their psychiatric illness. IMR can be provided in individual or group formats. The integrated ACT+IMR model was developed and manualized prior to the start of this evaluation (27). The model incorporates the following key features: a) ACT staff provide IMR in office-based group and/or individual sessions in office or community settings; b) regular community follow-up by ACT staff to assist clients with practicing IMR skills and achieving their goals; c) regular communication within ACT team (e.g., during daily meetings) on IMR client goals and progress; and d) supervision and consultation on IMR within ACT.
Interventions
The integrated ACT+IMR model was developed and manualized prior to the start of this evaluation (27). The model incorporates the following key features: a) ACT staff provide IMR in office-based group and/or individual sessions in office or community settings; b) regular community follow-up by ACT staff to assist clients with practicing IMR skills and achieving their goals; c) regular communication within ACT team (e.g., during daily meetings) on IMR client goals and progress; and d) supervision and consultation on IMR within ACT.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria Monroe-DeVita, PhD
Co-PI, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gary Morse, PhD
Co-PI, Places for People, St. Louis, MO
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2017
First Posted
March 9, 2017
Study Start
June 7, 2011
Primary Completion
March 31, 2015
Study Completion
March 31, 2015
Last Updated
March 9, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share