Efficacy of a Positive Psychology Intervention Through a Mobile App
1 other identifier
interventional
361
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy of several variations of an already validated Positive Psychology Intervention (PPI) called Best Possible Self in not flourishing population. This will be done through a mobile app specially designed for this aim. Concretely, the design will permit to compare the classic intervention (BPS Future), a new variation (BPS Past), and a combination of both components (BPS Past+Future). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of 3 conditions, in which they will practice the intervention for two weeks:
- BPS-PAST + BPS FUT condition: Participants will practice BPS Past for one week, and then they will switch to BPS future for another week.
- BPS-FUT condition: Participants will practice BPS Future for two weeks.
- CONTROL condition: Participants will practice DAILY ACTIVITIES for two weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 23, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 27, 2019
CompletedSeptember 23, 2019
September 1, 2019
3 months
March 2, 2017
September 19, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of Positive and Negative Affect from baseline to post-intervention
Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS; Watson, Clark \& Tellegen, 1988)
Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention (2 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Wellbeing
Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention (2 weeks)
Optimism
Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention (2 weeks)
Satisfaction with life
Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention (2 weeks)
Self-efficacy
Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention (2 weeks)
Study Arms (3)
BPS PAST + BPS FUT
EXPERIMENTALParticipants practice BPS PAST the first week, then they switch fot BPS FUT.
BPS FUT
EXPERIMENTALParticipants practice BPS FUT during the two weeks.
CONTROL
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants practice DAILY ACTIVITIES for the two weeks.
Interventions
Participants think about themselves in a past when they displayed their best self. Then, they visualize this with the help of audio instructions. They will practice within a mobile app.
Participants think about themselves in the future after everything has gone as well as it possibly could. Then, they visualize this with the help of audio instructions. They will practice within a mobile app.
Participants think about the activities they did during the last 24 hours. Then, they visualize this with the help of audio instructions. They will practice within a mobile app.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must be 18 years old or older.
- Participants must be willing to participate in the study.
- Participants must have a smartphone (Android or Ios).
You may not qualify if:
- To suffer from moderate depression or anxiety (scores of 11 or higher) measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Zigmond \& Snaith, 1983).
- To have "Flourishing mental health" measured by the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF; Keyes, 2009)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Valencialead
- University of Twentecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University of Twente
Enschede, Overijssel, 7522, Netherlands
University of Valencia
Valencia, 46010, Spain
Related Publications (4)
Meevissen YM, Peters ML, Alberts HJ. Become more optimistic by imagining a best possible self: effects of a two week intervention. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;42(3):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
PMID: 21450262BACKGROUNDKing L. The Health Benefits of Writing About Life Goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27(7): 798-807, 2001.
BACKGROUNDSheldon KM, Lyubomirsky S. How to increase and sustain positive emotion: The effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing best possible selves. The Journal of Positive Psychology 1(2): 73-82, 2006.
BACKGROUNDPeters ML, Flink IK, Boersma K, Linton SJ. Manipulating optimism: Can imagining a best possible self be used to increase positive future expectancies? The Journal of Positive Psychology 5(3): 204-211, 2010.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rosa Baños, PhD
University of Valencia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2017
First Posted
March 7, 2017
Study Start
April 23, 2019
Primary Completion
July 27, 2019
Study Completion
July 27, 2019
Last Updated
September 23, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share