NCT02321605

Brief Summary

This study is aimed to test the efficacy of a Positive Psychology Intervention (Best Possible Self) over optimism, future expectancies and positive affect at mid-term, in comparison to a control group. The principal hypothesis is that Best Possible Self intervention will enhance significantly the levels of optimism and positive affect in comparison to the control group at short and mid-term.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
78

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2013

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2013

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 17, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 22, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

December 22, 2014

Status Verified

December 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

December 17, 2014

Last Update Submit

December 19, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Best Possible SelfPositive PsychologyOptimismPositive TechnologyFuture Thinking

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Subjective Probability Task (SPT; MacLeod, 1996).

    This scale measures positive and negative expectancies about future events. It consists of 20 statements referring to negative expectancies and 10 statements referring to positive expectancies. Participants answer on a 7-point scale (Not at all likely to occur - Extremely likely to occur). Some studies have found an appropriate levels of internal consistency for positive and negative expectancies (α=0.80-0.82 y 0.91, respectively).

    4 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS, Watson, Clark & Tellegen, 1988; Sandín et al., 1999).

    4 months

  • Life Orientation Test (Lot-R; Otero, Luengo, Romero Gómez & Castro, 1998; Scheier, Carver & Bridges, 1994).

    4 months

  • Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II; Beck, 1996)

    4 months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Eysenck Personality Questionnaire - Revised - Neuroticism (EPQ-R-N; Eysenck, Eysenck & Barrett, 1985; Eysenck & Eysenck, 1997).

    Baseline

Study Arms (2)

BPS exercise

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention group which requires people to envision themselves in a future in which all has gone in the best possible way.

Behavioral: e-BPS

Daily Activities

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Control group which consists of thinking and writing about all the activities and situations that had taken place during the last 24 h.

Behavioral: Daily Activities

Interventions

e-BPSBEHAVIORAL

Participants are asked to write and imagine about a future in which they have reached all their goals and they have developed all their potentialities in four different domains: personal, professional, social and health domain. They carry out the exercise in a Positive Technology System called the "Book of Life", which has shown efficacy in the enhancement of positive mood (Baños, Etchemendy, Farfallini, García-Palacios, Quero \& Botella, 2014). This application looks like a personal diary, where participants can write all that they want and these essays are supported by multimedia content (pictures, songs and videos). Additionally, they can continue doing the exercise in a web platform in which they can visualize all the content they had developed previously.

Also known as: Best Possible Self, Positive Psychology Intervention
BPS exercise

Participants are asked to think and write about all that they have done the last 24 hours. They carry out the exercise in a powerpoint document, where they can record all the activities, situations and thoughts.

Also known as: Best Possible Self, Positive Psychology Intervention
Daily Activities

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Be between 18 and 70 years old.
  • Be willing to participate in the study.
  • Have an e-mail address.

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of severe physical illness.
  • Presence of psychological disorders.
  • Be receiving psychological treatment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Jaume I

Castellon, Castellón, 12006, Spain

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Botella C, Riva G, Gaggioli A, Wiederhold BK, Alcaniz M, Banos RM. The present and future of positive technologies. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012 Feb;15(2):78-84. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0140. Epub 2011 Dec 9.

    PMID: 22149078BACKGROUND
  • Meevissen YM, Peters ML, Alberts HJ. Become more optimistic by imagining a best possible self: effects of a two week intervention. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;42(3):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Mar 2.

    PMID: 21450262BACKGROUND
  • Peters, M. L., Flink, I. K., Boersma, K. y Linton, S. J. (2010). Manipulating optimism: Can imagining a best possible self be used to increase positive future expectancies? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(3), 204-211.

    BACKGROUND
  • Sheldon, K. M., y Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How to increase and sustain positive emotion: The effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing best possible selves. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(2), 73-82.

    BACKGROUND
  • Baños, R. M., Etchemendy, E., Farfallini, L., García-Palacios, A., Quero, S., & Botella, C. (2014). EARTH of Well-Being System: A pilot study of an Information and Communication Technology-based positive psychology intervention. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(6), 482-488.

    BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Activities of Daily Living

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • Cristina Botella, Professor

    Universitat Jaume I

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Juana M Bretón, Assistant Professor

    Universitat Jaume I

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Angel Enrique, PhD student

    Universitat Jaume I

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2014

First Posted

December 22, 2014

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion

August 1, 2014

Study Completion

October 1, 2014

Last Updated

December 22, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-12

Locations