Cognitive and Mood Assessment Data in Major Depressive Disorder Using Digital Wearable Technology
A Single Center Pilot Study to Evaluate Real Time Passive and Active High-Frequency Cognitive and Mood Assessment Data in Major Depressive Disorder Using Digital Wearable Technology
1 other identifier
observational
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and compliance with a novel method for assessing mood and cognition in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Mar 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 3, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 10, 2019
CompletedJanuary 10, 2019
July 1, 2018
4 months
February 26, 2017
July 2, 2018
July 2, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Percentage of Days on Which Daily N-back Sessions Were Completed
The cognitive assessment n-back test was completed on the wearable technology (Apple watch) on 3 occasions across the day in the morning, afternoon and evening.
Baseline up to Week 6
Percentage of Days on Which Daily Mood Assessment Tests Were Completed
The Daily Mood assessments were completed on the wearable technology (Apple watch) once per day in the afternoon or evening.
Baseline up to Week 6
Correlation Coefficient Between Measures of Cognition (N-back Scores) and Performance on the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) Tests: Spatial Working Memory Between Errors (SWMBE) and Spatial Working Memory Strategy (SWMS)
The n-back was used to assess cognition 3 times a day. Participants responded by touching the watch face when a symbol matched the one presented 2-back. Average daily n-back score (d-prime) was calculated. CANTAB tests consists of a battery of neuropsychological tests. Spatial Working Memory (SWM) assessed retention of spatial data, ability to manipulate remembered items and strategize. Participant was asked to find tokens in on-screen boxes and move them. SWMBE=cumulative number of times participant went back to box that a token was previously removed per each successful study. Lower score was better. SWMS=number of unique boxes participant searched in two 6 and 8 box trials. Total of 4 trial scores ranged from 4-28. Lower score indicated better performance. Pearson's correlation coefficient measured linear correlation between n-back scores from Apple Watch and CANTAB tests, provided as a value +1=positive correlation to -1=negative correlation. 0=no correlation.
Baseline up to Week 6
Correlation Coefficient Between Measures of Cognition (N-back Scores) and Performance on the CANTAB Test: Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVP)
The n-back was used to assess cognition 3 times a day. Participants responded by touching the watch face when a symbol matched the one presented 2-back. Average daily n-back score (d-prime) was calculated. CANTAB tests consists of a battery of neuropsychological tests. RVP measures sustained attention. A white box appears in the center of the computer screen, inside which digits, from 2 to 9, appear in a pseudo-random order, at the rate of 100 digits per minute. Participants are requested to detect target sequences of digits. RVPA=measure of sensitivity to the target, regardless of response tendency (expected range is 0.00 to 1.00). Speed of Processing (RVPMDL)=The mean response latency during assessment sequence blocks where the participant responded correctly. Pearson's correlation coefficient measured linear correlation between n-back scores from Apple Watch and CANTAB tests, provided a value +1=positive correlation to -1=negative correlation. 0=no correlation.
Baseline up to Week 6
Study Arms (1)
Participants With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Participants with MDD were provided with an Apple watch on which brief cognitive and mood tests were evaluated daily up to 6 weeks.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) were provided with an Apple watch on which brief cognitive and mood tests were evaluated daily up to 6 weeks.
You may qualify if:
- Has MDD as the primary psychiatric diagnosis.
- Has been treated previously with at least 1 antidepressant (monotherapy).
- Has scores on Participant Health Questionnaire-9 items (PHQ-9) ≥5 and PHQ-9 ≤15 at Screening
You may not qualify if:
- Has a significant risk of suicide according to the investigator's clinical judgment or has made an actual suicide attempt in the previous 6 months prior to Screening.
- Has a history of only responding to either combination or augmentation therapy in the current episode and has had been treated for more than a year without any period of remission.
- Has 1 or more of the following:
- Current or history of: manic or hypomanic episode, schizophrenia or any other psychotic disorder, including schizoaffective disorder, major depression with psychotic features, bipolar depression with psychotic features, obsessive compulsive disorder, mental retardation, organic mental disorders, or mental disorders due to a general medical condition as defined in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5).
- Current diagnosis or history of alcohol or other substance abuse or dependence (excluding nicotine or caffeine).
- Neurodegenerative disorder (Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, Huntington disease, etc).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (1)
Takeda Investigative Site
London, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director
- Organization
- Takeda
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director Clinical Science
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2017
First Posted
March 1, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
July 3, 2017
Study Completion
July 3, 2017
Last Updated
January 10, 2019
Results First Posted
January 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-07