Does Vaginal Washing Affect the Success Rate of the Labour Induction?
Does Vaginal Washing Before Inserting Dinoprostone Affect the Success Rate of the Labour Induction?
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Investigators will use dinoprostone(Propess TM) for cervix ripening and labor induction in term pregnant women.Vaginal pH base is achieved with the effect of hormones in pregnancy and associated with this, vaginal infections rates increase. With the vaginal application of Propess, the preparate remains in the vagina for a long time, with controlled release,creating a film layer against bacteria and especially fungal infections and it was thought that this could be a reason for unsuccessful birth induction by preventing release of this ovule. The aim of this study is to observe whether or not the rate of caesareans with the indication of unsuccessful induction was reduced in patients by reducing the density of vaginal bacteria and fungi with vaginal lavage and thereby increasing the effect of the drug and decreasing the rate of unsuccessful inductions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 20, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2017
CompletedJanuary 31, 2018
January 1, 2018
10 months
January 21, 2017
January 29, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Succesful cervical repining which allows succesful vaginal delivery
Cervical ripening is defined cervical Bishop score \>5 the indication of unsuccessful induction
12 Months
Study Arms (2)
vaginal lavage group
ACTIVE COMPARATORWe will make vaginal lavage with steril %0.9 NaCl serum ( 20cc) before inserting dinoprostone (Propess ®) 10 mg vaginal ovule
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORWe will insert dinoprostone (Propess ®) vaginal ovule without vaginal lavage.
Interventions
vaginal washing will be applied with steril %0.9 NaCl serum (20cc) before intravaginal PGE2 insertion.
vaginal washing will be not applied with steril %0.9 NaCl serum (20cc) before intravaginal PGE2 insertion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with singleton pregnancies
- Term gestational week (defined as\>37 weeks),
- Fetal cephalic presentation
- Participiants with with intact amniotic membrane
- Reactive fetal heart rate
- Cervical Modified Bishop's score \<5
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with with multipl pregnancies
- Participiants with malpresentation anomalies
- Participiants with nonreassurring fetal heart rate
- Participiants with more than three contractions in 10 minutes
- Participiants with contrandications for using prostaglandins
- Participiants with fetal anomaly
- Participiants with fetal demise
- Participiants with emercency delivery indications,
- Participiants with previous cesarean delivery or have other uterine surgery
- Participiants with cephalopelvic disproportion
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Children Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
İlter Yenidede, MD
Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Children Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Çetin Kılıççı
Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Children Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ob&Gyn Specialist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2017
First Posted
February 13, 2017
Study Start
February 20, 2017
Primary Completion
December 10, 2017
Study Completion
December 20, 2017
Last Updated
January 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01