Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Treatment Response in Patients With Liver Cancer Receiving Transarterial Chemoembolization With Drug Eluting Beads
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Transarterial Chemoembolization With Drug Eluting Beads
2 other identifiers
interventional
15
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This pilot clinical trial compares the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to contrast-enhanced magnetic response imaging (MRI), the current clinical standard, in predicting treatment response in patients with liver cancer receiving transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads. Comparing results of diagnostic procedures before and after transarterial chemoembolization may help doctors predict a patient's response to treatment and help plan the best treatment. It is not yet known if contrast-enhanced ultrasound works better than contrast-enhanced MRI in predicting treatment response in patients with liver cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1 hepatocellular-carcinoma
Started Dec 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_1 hepatocellular-carcinoma
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 12, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 5, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 5, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2017
CompletedMay 2, 2025
May 1, 2025
12 months
January 31, 2017
May 1, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict response to transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of hepatocellular carcinomas at one month will be evaluated to see if it correlates with the clinical evaluation standard of a contrast-enhanced MRI at one month. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test. Inter- and intra-observer variability will also be calculated.
Up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in quantitative blood flow parameters
Baseline to up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Quantitative parameters of tumor vascularity
Baseline to up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Changes in perfusion
Baseline to up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Changes in contrast fill time
Baseline to up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Study Arms (1)
Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound)
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive perflutren lipid microspheres IV and then undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging over approximately 1 hour prior to transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads, at 1-2 weeks and 1 month post transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads. Patients also undergo contrast-enhanced MRI at 1 month post-treatment per standard of care.
Interventions
Given IV
Undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging
Undergo contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be scheduled for a transarterial chemoembolization using drug eluting beads for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
- Be medically stable
- If a female of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test
- Have signed Informed Consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Females who are pregnant or nursing
- Patients who are medically unstable, patients who are seriously or terminally ill, and patients whose clinical course is unpredictable; for example:
- Patients on life support or in a critical care unit
- Patients with unstable occlusive disease (eg, crescendo angina)
- Patients with clinically unstable cardiac arrhythmias, such as recurrent ventricular tachycardia
- Patients with uncontrolled congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class IV)
- Patients with recent cerebral hemorrhage
- Patients with clinically significant and unstable renal disease (eg, transplant recipients in rejection)
- Patients who have undergone surgery within 24 hours prior to the study sonographic examination
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to perflutren
- Patients who have received any contrast medium (x-ray, MRI, computed tomography \[CT\], or ultrasound \[US\]) in the 24 hours prior to the research US exam
- Patients with cardiac shunts
- Patients with congenital heart defects
- Patients with severe emphysema, pulmonary vasculitis, or a history of pulmonary emboli
- Patients with respiratory distress syndrome
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Flemming Forsberg, PhD
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2017
First Posted
February 7, 2017
Study Start
December 12, 2012
Primary Completion
December 5, 2013
Study Completion
December 5, 2013
Last Updated
May 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05