NCT03039998

Brief Summary

The main objective of project is to compare validity of sampling methods performed routinely (bronchial secretion, stomach content, oropharyngeal smear) for determination of etiological agent responsible for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in critically ill patients to bronchoscopy-assisted protected brush method. Evaluation of the present clinical praxis using bronchial secretion sampling in HAP diagnostics and detection of the most common etiological agents in patients with HAP are other priorities of the project. Aiming to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of HAP, determine the sources and possible routes of bacterial pathogens transmission molecular biology analysis of etiological agents is performed. Finally, percentage of HAP etiological agents resistant to initial empiric antibiotic therapy will be observed.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2013

Typical duration for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2013

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 10, 2016

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

February 1, 2017

Status Verified

January 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

May 10, 2016

Last Update Submit

January 30, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic methods etiological agents HAP. Scale: sensitivity and specificity of each method.

    Obtaining 4 types of agent samples: endotracheal aspirate, gastric aspirate, oropharyngeal swab and protected specimen brushing when clinical signs of HAP arisen and after 72 hours

    72 hours

Study Arms (1)

HAP Patients

HAP, intubated and mechanically ventilated.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The patients hospitalized in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc fulfilling HAP criteria will be enrolled in the study: presence of newly developed or progressive infiltrates on chest radiographs after minimum of 48hours of hospitalization plus at least two other signs of respiratory tract infection: temperature \>38 °C, purulent sputum, leukocytosis \>10x103/mm3 or leukopenia \<4x103/mm3, signs of inflammation on auscultation, cough and/or respiratory insufficiency with oxygenation index (Horowitz) PaO2/ FiO2 ≤300 mm Hg. Clinically ongoing lung inflammation is verified by chest radiograph or CT in the mechanically ventilated patient.

You may qualify if:

  • clinical signs of HAP
  • need for intubation and mechanical ventilation

You may not qualify if:

  • inability to obtain samples in 24 hours after clinical diagnosis of HAP

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (11)

  • Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, Bruining HA, White J, Nicolas-Chanoin MH, Wolff M, Spencer RC, Hemmer M. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. JAMA. 1995 Aug 23-30;274(8):639-44.

    PMID: 7637145BACKGROUND
  • Uvizl R, Hanulik V, Husickova V, Sedlakova MH, Adamus M, Kolar M. Hospital-acquired pneumonia in ICU patients. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2011 Dec;155(4):373-8. doi: 10.5507/bp.2011.067.

    PMID: 22336651BACKGROUND
  • American Thoracic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb 15;171(4):388-416. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200405-644ST. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15699079BACKGROUND
  • Craven DE, Palladino R, McQuillen DP. Healthcare-associated pneumonia in adults: management principles to improve outcomes. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2004 Dec;18(4):939-62. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2004.08.001.

    PMID: 15555833BACKGROUND
  • Uvizl R, Adamus M, Cerny V, Dusek L, Jarkovsky J, Sramek V, Matejovic M, Stourac P, Kula R, Malaska J, Sevcik P. Patient survival, predictive factors and disease course of severe sepsis in Czech intensive care units: A multicentre, retrospective, observational study. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2016 Jun;160(2):287-97. doi: 10.5507/bp.2015.052. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

    PMID: 26526190BACKGROUND
  • Jones RN. Microbial etiologies of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Aug 1;51 Suppl 1:S81-7. doi: 10.1086/653053.

    PMID: 20597676BACKGROUND
  • [Pneumonia-causing bacterial pathogens in intensive care patients]. Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek. 2011 Aug;17(4):135-40. Czech.

    PMID: 22052100BACKGROUND
  • Torres A, Ewig S, Lode H, Carlet J; European HAP working group. Defining, treating and preventing hospital acquired pneumonia: European perspective. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jan;35(1):9-29. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1336-9. Epub 2008 Nov 7.

    PMID: 18989656BACKGROUND
  • Kowalczyk W, Rybicki Z, Tomaszewski D, Truszczynski A, Guzek A. [The comparison of different bronchial aspirate culturing methods in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)]. Anestezjol Intens Ter. 2011 Apr-Jun;43(2):74-9. Polish.

    PMID: 22011866BACKGROUND
  • Butler KL, Best IM, Oster RA, Katon-Benitez I, Lynn Weaver W, Bumpers HL. Is bilateral protected specimen brush sampling necessary for the accurate diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia? J Trauma. 2004 Aug;57(2):316-22. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000088858.22080.cb.

    PMID: 15345979BACKGROUND
  • Gerbeaux P, Ledoray V, Boussuges A, Molenat F, Jean P, Sainty JM. Diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: repeatability of the bronchoalveolar lavage. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;157(1):76-80. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.1.9604070.

    PMID: 9445281BACKGROUND

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

endotracheal aspirate, gastric aspirate, oropharyngeal swab, protected specimen brushing

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cross InfectionInfectionsPneumoniaRespiratory Tract InfectionsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesIatrogenic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Tomáš Gabrhelík, MD, PhD

    University Hospital Olomouc

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Radovan Uvízl, MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2016

First Posted

February 1, 2017

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

February 1, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share