Brief Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Brief Treatment for PTSD: Enhancing Retention and Engagement
1 other identifier
interventional
169
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The primary goal of this study is to examine whether a brief treatment approach for PTSD is equally efficacious in the treatment of active duty service members relative to a first line treatment approach that requires much greater treatment dose.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 20, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 24, 2023
CompletedMay 24, 2023
July 1, 2022
5.4 years
December 2, 2016
March 3, 2022
July 22, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, 5 (CAPS-5)
The CAPS-5 is a semi-structured interview for assessment of PTSD according to DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. The measure assesses PTSD according to the 20 symptoms of DSM-5, as well as impairment. A total score is calculated as well as whether PTSD diagnosis is met. Scores can range from 0-80, with higher scores representing greater symptom severity. For this study, the CAPS-5 total score was used as the primary outcome measure.
Change from baseline to 10-, 20-, 30-weeks post first treatment session
Study Arms (2)
Written exposure therapy
EXPERIMENTAL5 sessions of imaginal exposure therapy.
CPT, cognitive only
ACTIVE COMPARATOR12 sessions of cognitive therapy.
Interventions
five sessions of writing about traumatic experience.
12 sessions of cognitive therapy related to traumatic experience.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female active duty military personnel who have deployed in support of a post-9/11 conflict seeking treatment for PTSD
- Diagnosis of PTSD
- Ability to speak, read and write English
- Not currently engaged in psychosocial treatment for PTSD
- Individuals taking psychotropic medications agree to work with their prescriber to remain on stable doses of any prescribed psychotropic medications for the duration of the intervention and through the first follow-up assessment as much as possible and as medically indicated.
You may not qualify if:
- Current suicide or homicide risk meriting crisis intervention
- Active psychosis
- Moderate to severe brain damage
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Boston VA Research Institute, Inc.lead
- University of Texascollaborator
- United States Department of Defensecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Ft. Hood
Killeen, Texas, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Related Publications (2)
Sloan DM, Marx BP, Resick PA, Young-McCaughan S, Dondanville KA, Straud CL, Mintz J, Litz BT, Peterson AL; STRONG STAR Consortium. Effect of Written Exposure Therapy vs Cognitive Processing Therapy on Increasing Treatment Efficiency Among Military Service Members With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2140911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40911.
PMID: 35015065BACKGROUNDSloan DM, Marx BP, Resick PA, Young-McCaughan S, Dondanville KA, Mintz J, Litz BT, Peterson AL; STRONG STAR Consortium. Study design comparing written exposure therapy to cognitive processing therapy for PTSD among military service members: A noninferiority trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Dec 10;17:100507. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100507. eCollection 2020 Mar.
PMID: 31890987BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Participants who dropped out prematurely of treatment were less likely to return for subsequent assessments.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Denise Sloan, Professor of Psychiatry
- Organization
- VA Boston Healthcare System & Boston University School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Denise Sloan, Ph.D.
Boston VA Research Institute, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2016
First Posted
January 27, 2017
Study Start
July 20, 2015
Primary Completion
December 15, 2020
Study Completion
March 31, 2021
Last Updated
May 24, 2023
Results First Posted
May 24, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 12 months after publication of the primary outcomes.
- Access Criteria
- Written request to the PI describing rationale for why data is needed and what will be done with data.
Data will be made available upon written request to the PI.