Study Stopped
Only 2 patients enrolled
Patient Experience Comparing Tonic Vs. Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation For Chronic Pain
An Evaluation Study of Patient Experience Comparing Tonic Vs. Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation For Chronic Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
2
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Researchers are evaluating if subjects who have already experienced tonic spinal cord stimulation would have a better pain relief status with burst spinal cord stimulation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Oct 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 12, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 14, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 14, 2021
CompletedJanuary 18, 2022
November 1, 2021
1.5 years
November 8, 2019
January 3, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pain intensity
Change in Pain scores using Numeric Rating Scale (1-10)
Participants will be followed at baseline, before and after the 2-3 weeks burst reprograming trial, and 3-8 months after burst trial ends
Pain quality, intensity and localization
Change in pain perception using Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2
Participants will be followed at baseline, before and after the 2-3 weeks burst reprograming trial, and 3-8 months after burst trial ends
Pain perception
Change in pain perception using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale self-reported survey
Participants will be followed at baseline, before and after the 2-3 weeks burst reprograming trial, and 3-8 months after burst trial ends
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Depression
Participants will be followed at baseline, before and after the 2-3 weeks burst reprograming trial, and 3-8 months after burst trial ends
Functioning
Participants will be followed at baseline, before and after the 2-3 weeks burst reprograming trial, and 3-8 months after burst trial ends
Participant self-evaluation of Quality of Life
Participants will be followed at baseline, before and after the 2-3 weeks burst reprograming trial, and 3-8 months after burst trial ends
Participant's impression of Quality of Life
Participants will be followed at baseline, before and after the 2-3 weeks burst reprograming trial, and 3-8 months after burst trial ends
Study Arms (1)
Spinal Cord Stimulator
OTHERBurst neurostimulation
Interventions
We will record patient's experience on the 30-Day FDA approved Burst Spinal Cord Stimulator Trial (BurstDR™, Abbott Saint Jude Medical).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females ≥18 years-old
- Diagnosed with chronic pain
- Have an already-implanted Eon Family IPG for a minimum period of 6 months
- Are interested in trying burst technology by reprograming their IPG for 2-3 weeks according to the 30-Day Trial standard of care
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Subject's overall Beck Depression Inventory II Score is \>24 or has a score of 3 on question 9 relating to suicidal thoughts or wishes at the screening visit; If subjects scores indicate suicidal thoughts, subject is going to be evaluated further if they will be subjects to Baker's act
- Subject is currently receiving, applying or considering seeking disability payments, workers compensation, or is involved in disability litigation
- Subject has an infusion pump or any other implantable neurostimulator device
- Subjects with a separate, concurrent, clinically significant or disabling chronic pain problem that requires additional medical or surgical treatment
- Subject's pain originates from peripheral vascular disease
- Subject is immunocompromised
- Subject has a documented history of substance abuse (narcotics, alcohol, etc.) or substance dependency in the 6 months prior to baseline data collection
- Subject has history of cancer requiring active treatment in the last 6 months
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic in Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Osborne, MD
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2019
First Posted
November 12, 2019
Study Start
October 10, 2019
Primary Completion
April 14, 2021
Study Completion
April 14, 2021
Last Updated
January 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share