Comparing Effects of Various Combinations of 6 Hertz(Hz) rTMS & LFrTMS on Motor Recovery Due to Cerebrovascular Disease
Series Study About the rTMS Effects on the Recovery of Limb Motor Dysfunction Due to Cerebral Vascular Disease, Part 1: Comparing the Effects of Various Combinations Between 6 Hertz(Hz) rTMS & LFrTMS.
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare the effects of various combinations between 6 hertz(Hz) rTMS \& LFrTMS on the limb motor dysfunction due to cerebral vascular disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 16, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedMarch 15, 2017
March 1, 2017
1.8 years
January 4, 2017
March 14, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA)
Score of Fugl-Meyer assessment
1) Before treatment (Baseline); 2) Change from Baseline FMA at the 1st workday after the last treatment; 3) Change from Baseline FMA at the 28th natural day after the last treatment
Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function (STEF)
Score of Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function
1) Before treatment (Baseline); 2) Change from Baseline STEF at the 1st workday after the last treatment; 3) Change from Baseline STEF at the 28th natural day after the last treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
1) Before treatment (Baseline); 2) Change from Baseline NIHSS at the 1st workday after the last treatment; 3) Change from Baseline NIHSS at the 28th natural day after the last treatment
Study Arms (4)
combined rTMS at both M1
EXPERIMENTALcombined rTMS at both M1: sham 6 hertz(Hz) rTMS on unaffected M1 / real 1 Hz rTMS on unaffected M1 / real 6 Hz rTMS on affected M1
real primed LFrTMS at unaffected M1
EXPERIMENTALreal primed LFrTMS at unaffected M1: real 6 hertz(Hz) rTMS on unaffected M1 / real 1 Hz rTMS on unaffected M1 / sham 6 Hz rTMS on affected M1
real LFrTMS at unaffected M1
ACTIVE COMPARATORreal LFrTMS at unaffected M1: sham 6 hertz(Hz) rTMS on unaffected M1 / real 1 Hz rTMS on unaffected M1 / sham 6 Hz rTMS on affected M1
all sham stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORall sham stimulation: sham 6 hertz(Hz) rTMS on unaffected M1 / sham 1 Hz rTMS on unaffected M1 /sham 6 Hz rTMS on affected M1
Interventions
Compare the effect of LFrTMS at unaffected M1 to that of all sham stimulation on motor rehabilitation after cerebrovascular disease . rTMS: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Combination Elements: ①6 hertz(Hz) rTMS at unaffected M1 before LFrTMS at unaffected M1 ;②6 Hz rTMS at affected M1;③1 Hz rTMS at unaffected M1. The four groups are the combinations of real or sham ①/②/③.
Compare the effect of primed LFrTMS at unaffected M1 to that of LFrTMS at unaffected M1 on motor rehabilitation after cerebrovascular disease . rTMS: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Combination Elements: ①6 hertz(Hz) rTMS at unaffected M1 before LFrTMS at unaffected M1 ;②6 Hz rTMS at affected M1;③1 Hz rTMS at unaffected M1. The four groups are the combinations of real or sham ①/②/③.
Compare the effect of combined rTMS at both M1 to that of primed LFrTMS at unaffected M1 on motor rehabilitation after cerebrovascular disease . rTMS: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Combination Elements: ①6 hertz(Hz) rTMS at unaffected M1 before LFrTMS at unaffected M1 ;②6 Hz rTMS at affected M1;③1 Hz rTMS at unaffected M1. The four groups are the combinations of real or sham ①/②/③.
used as controls to eliminate the placebo effect of all kinds of combinated rTMS
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged from 30 to 90 years;
- Newly onset cerebral infarction or brain hemorrhage confirmed by MRI or CT;
- the disease duration is less than 20 weeks when recruited into the trial;
- no existence of limb motor dysfunction before this onset, and new occurrence of unilateral limb motor dysfunction after this onset;
- the physical and mental condition are good enough to cooperate with the assessment and treatment;
- the NIHSS score: total 5-20,1a,1b,1c=0;
- the subject or legal guardian sign the consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- during pregnancy;
- with skull defect;
- with metal implants, cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implantation;
- epileptiform discharge in EEG.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Beijing Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
Related Publications (5)
Sung WH, Wang CP, Chou CL, Chen YC, Chang YC, Tsai PY. Efficacy of coupling inhibitory and facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance motor recovery in hemiplegic stroke patients. Stroke. 2013 May;44(5):1375-82. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000522. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
PMID: 23532011BACKGROUNDWang CP, Tsai PY, Yang TF, Yang KY, Wang CC. Differential effect of conditioning sequences in coupling inhibitory/facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke motor recovery. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2014 Apr;20(4):355-63. doi: 10.1111/cns.12221. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
PMID: 24422912BACKGROUNDCarey JR, Anderson DC, Gillick BT, Whitford M, Pascual-Leone A. 6-Hz primed low-frequency rTMS to contralesional M1 in two cases with middle cerebral artery stroke. Neurosci Lett. 2010 Jan 29;469(3):338-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.12.023. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
PMID: 20026185BACKGROUNDCassidy JM, Chu H, Anderson DC, Krach LE, Snow L, Kimberley TJ, Carey JR. A Comparison of Primed Low-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatments in Chronic Stroke. Brain Stimul. 2015 Nov-Dec;8(6):1074-84. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
PMID: 26198365BACKGROUNDCarey JR, Evans CD, Anderson DC, Bhatt E, Nagpal A, Kimberley TJ, Pascual-Leone A. Safety of 6-Hz primed low-frequency rTMS in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):185-92. doi: 10.1177/1545968307305458. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
PMID: 17876070BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Li Zhuang, M.D.
Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, China
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2017
First Posted
January 6, 2017
Study Start
February 16, 2017
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
March 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03