Plaque Prolapse Prevention Carotid Artery Stenting (3PCAS)
3PCAS
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the present positive-control study is to analyze and compare the rate of off-table subclinical neurological events in two groups of patients submitted to carotid artery stenting (CAS) with two different kind of stents, a close-cell stent, and the new mesh-covered stent, so to verify if the new model of stent is effective in preventing postprocedural carotid plaque embolism.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedSeptember 15, 2017
September 1, 2017
1.9 years
January 15, 2016
September 14, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
perioperative (intraoperative and up to 72 hours postoperatively) neurological ischemic events clinically detectable.
perioperative (intraoperative and up to 72 hours postoperatively) neurological ischemic events clinically (TIA, stroke, permanent focal retinal artery occlusion, neurological death).
intraoperative and up to 72 hours postoperatively
perioperative (intraoperative and up to 72 hours postoperatively) neurological ischemic events subclinically detectable.
perioperative (intraoperative and up to 72 hours postoperatively) neurological ischemic events subclinically detectable (by new DW-MRI lesions, ≥0.02 µg/L increase in S100β and/or ≥0.3 µg/L increase in NSE serum levels, ≥5 variation in postprocedural MiniMentalStateExaminationTest -MMSE score).
intraoperative and up to 72 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (2)
local (inguinal haemathoma, pseudoaneurysm formation, access vessel dissection or thrombosis) complications occurring during or after procedure.
intraoperative and up to 72 hours postoperatively
systemic complications occurring during or after procedure.
intraoperative and up to 72 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
C-Guard carotid stent
EXPERIMENTALCarotid stenting procedure by C-Guard stent implantation (InspireMD, Boston, MA, USA)
Wallstent carotid stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORCarotid stenting procedure by Wallstent implantation (BostonScientific, Marlborough, MA, USA)
Interventions
Carotid stenting procedure by carotid stent implantation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- presence of a carotid stenosis ≥70% (NASCET evaluation criteria)
- no previous neurologic symptoms referred in the medical history
- absence of a previous brain ischemic lesion detected at DW-MRI
You may not qualify if:
- symptomatic carotid lesions
- previous ischemic brain lesions detected at DW-MRI
- inability to give consent
- significant contraindications to angiography,
- history of bleeding disorder,
- intracranial aneurysm or vascular malformation or hemorrhage,
- presence of intraluminal thrombus,
- poor entry points at the femoral artery,
- type 2-3 arch,
- bovine arch,
- severe aortic arch or ipsilateral ostial common carotid or brachiocephalic atherosclerosis,
- severe proximal common or distal internal carotid artery tortuosity,
- sharply angulated internal carotid artery,
- carotid string sign,
- circumferential calcification of carotid plaque,
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Laura Capoccia
Roma, 00161, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Capoccia L, Speziale F, Gazzetti M, Mariani P, Rizzo A, Mansour W, Sbarigia E, Fiorani P. Comparative study on carotid revascularization (endarterectomy vs stenting) using markers of cellular brain injury, neuropsychometric tests, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Mar;51(3):584-91, 591.e1-3; discussion 592. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.079. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
PMID: 20045614BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Francesco Speziale
Chief and Full Professor Vascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery "Paride Stefanini", Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2016
First Posted
January 28, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share