NCT03008564

Brief Summary

There has been dispute about the location at which the adductor canal block should be performed (3-6). Two Common approaches have been used for ultrasound guided adductor canal blocks with the 'point of entry' being:

  1. 1.Point A: midway point between the ASIS and base of patella
  2. 2.Point B: Point which is 2-3 cm proximal to the site where the femoral artery becomes the popliteal artery as it traverses away from the sartorius muscle towards the femur at the adductor hiatus (2)
  3. 3.Measuring the distance between Point A and Point B
  4. 4.Studying the ultrasound anatomy at Point A and B - Determine their location with respect to the adductor canal and femoral triangle.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 28, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 2, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 16, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 16, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

December 7, 2017

Status Verified

November 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

December 28, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 5, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Measurement 1

    The distance in cm between Point A and Point B

    One time assessment done during Ultrasound scanning of the lower extremity

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Measurement 2

    One time assessment done during Ultrasound scanning of the lower extremity

  • Measurement 3

    One time assessment done during Ultrasound scanning of the lower extremity

  • Measurement 4

    One time assessment done during Ultrasound scanning of the lower extremity

Interventions

Several reference points will be marked by anatomical landmarks and/or ultrasound: the anterior superior iliac spine; base of patella; apex of the femoral triangle A measuring tape will be used to measure the anterior superior iliac spine (landmark); the base of the patella (landmark); apex of femoral triangle (ultrasound); and distal most portion of adductor canal (Point B described earlier; ultrasound). We will then measure the ASIS to: 1) base of patella; 2) apex of femoral triangle; and 3) Point B. We will repeat the same procedure on the opposite leg. Once complete, the volunteer will be allowed to dress and leave. The procedure should take approximately 10-20 minutes for each volunteer. The following things will be recorded for each subject: * Age * Gender * Weight * Height * BMI * Distance of ASIS to base of patella * Distance of Point A to base of patella * Distance of Point B to base of patella * Distance of apex of femoral triangle to base of patella

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

We aim to recruit volunteers who principally are healthcare employees at UIHC who mainly work in the Main Operating Rooms and Ambulatory Surgical Center Operating Rooms, mainly due to ease of access to ultrasonographic equipment. The subjects include anesthesiologists, certified registered nurse anesthetists, residents, interns, nurses, volunteers, technicians, administrative staff and other members of staff working in these areas.

You may qualify if:

  • age 18-75 years, body mass index 18-35 kg/m2

You may not qualify if:

  • no previous surgery or complaints from the lower extremity region

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, 52246, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Pedersen EM, Borglum J. Defining adductor canal block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 May-Jun;39(3):253-4. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000052. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24747312BACKGROUND
  • Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Apaydin N, Oakes WJ, Salter EG. Anatomy and potential clinical significance of the vastoadductor membrane. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007 Oct;29(7):569-73. doi: 10.1007/s00276-007-0230-4. Epub 2007 Jul 7.

    PMID: 17618402BACKGROUND
  • Jaeger P, Zaric D, Fomsgaard JS, Hilsted KL, Bjerregaard J, Gyrn J, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):526-32. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000015.

    PMID: 24121608BACKGROUND
  • Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Pedersen EM, Borglum J. Redefining the adductor canal block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;39(5):442-3. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000119. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25140514BACKGROUND
  • Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Borglum J. Basic Topography of the Saphenous Nerve in the Femoral Triangle and the Adductor Canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):391-2. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000261. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26079358BACKGROUND
  • Manickam B, Perlas A, Duggan E, Brull R, Chan VW, Ramlogan R. Feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-guided block of the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):578-80. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181bfbf84.

    PMID: 19916251BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Amanda Yap, MBBS

    319-356-1616

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2016

First Posted

January 2, 2017

Study Start

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion

June 16, 2017

Study Completion

June 16, 2017

Last Updated

December 7, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations