HFNC vs Nasal Cannula in Mild Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation
Comparison of High Flow Nasal Cannula vs Nasal Cannula in Mild Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation(AECOPD)
1 other identifier
interventional
328
1 country
1
Brief Summary
For AECOPD patients, only 8% patients ventilated by noninvasive and invasive positive pressure ventilation. Nasal cannula is the most common pattern of oxygen therapy in mild AECOPD. As a low flow oxygen therapy, nasal cannula has many disadvantages.Therefore, we design a randomized controlled trial(RCT)to explore whether HFNC would be better than nasal cannula to prevent the aggravation of respiratory failure and endotracheal intubation in mild AECOPD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 28, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
January 1, 2020
3.9 years
December 22, 2016
January 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
endotracheal intubation demand rate
90days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
actual endotracheal intubation rate
90days
Study Arms (2)
High flow nasal cannula
EXPERIMENTALHigh flow nasal cannula(OptiflowTM); Flow 25-60 L/min is set according to patients' comfort; FiO2 is adjusted to maintain peripheral capillary oxygen saturation(SpO2) 90-95%; temperature is set at 37.
Nasal cannula
NO INTERVENTIONNasal cannula;set oxygen flow to keep SpO2 90-95%
Interventions
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a new emerging noninvasive respiratory support technology, which mainly includes high flow (15-60 L/min) device, heating humidification device and nasal cannula for high flow. A large number of physiological studies confirmed that HFNC has the following critical physiological effects: promoting airway humidification, improving tolerance of treatment, reducing the physiological dead space on the upper respiratory tract, producing a certain level of positive end expiratory pressure (2-7 cmH2O), decreasing the work of breathing and so on.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- AECOPD; pH≥7.35, PaCO2\>45 mmHg
You may not qualify if:
- Need to be intubated immediately; refuse to engage in the study; severe organ dysfunction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
China-Japan Friendship hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100028, China
Related Publications (2)
Xia J, Yang H, Zhan Q, Fan Y, Wang C. High-flow nasal cannula may prolong the length of hospital stay in patients with hypercapnic acute COPD exacerbation. Respir Med. 2023 Dec;220:107465. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107465. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
PMID: 37956934DERIVEDXia J, Gu S, Lei W, Zhang J, Wei H, Liu C, Zhang H, Lu R, Zhang L, Jiang M, Hu C, Cheng Z, Wei C, Chen Y, Lu F, Chen M, Bi H, Liu H, Yan C, Teng H, Yang Y, Liang C, Ge Y, Hou P, Liu J, Gao W, Zhang Y, Feng Y, Tao C, Huang X, Pan P, Luo H, Yun C, Zhan Q. High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in acute COPD exacerbation with mild hypercapnia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2022 Apr 15;26(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03973-7.
PMID: 35428349DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Qingyuan Zhan, M.D.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- head of Pulmonary and Critical care medicine ward 4
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2016
First Posted
December 28, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share