Physiotherapy in Hypoxic AECOPD Patients
Feasibility and Efficacy of Physiotherapy in Hypoxic AECOPD Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hypoxia is considered a key player in many of the comorbidities that characterize COPD, such as pulmonary hypertension, skeletal muscle dysfunction, and systemic inflammation. These comorbidities are worsened during an exacerbation due to prolonged bed rest and treatment with steroids, showing a reduction in the quality of life, exercise tolerance, and a greater risk of death in these patients. Therefore, a better understanding of the safety and effectiveness of exercise training for AECOPD patients with resting hypoxemia is needed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2020
CompletedMarch 4, 2020
March 1, 2020
1 month
February 17, 2020
March 2, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Lower limb strength
Quadriceps strength was assessed with a portable hand-held dynamometer (Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System, model 01163, Lafayette, IN, USA). The test was performed with the patient seated with his/her knees and hips flexed at 90°. Resistance was applied to the anterior tibia during 5 seconds of maximal muscle contraction. The test was repeated alternatively 3 times on the leg, allowing participants to rest between measurements. The highest value in Newton was selected for the analysis.
Baseline
Lower limb strength
Quadriceps strength was assessed with a portable hand-held dynamometer (Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System, model 01163, Lafayette, IN, USA). The test was performed with the patient seated with his/her knees and hips flexed at 90°. Resistance was applied to the anterior tibia during 5 seconds of maximal muscle contraction. The test was repeated alternatively 3 times on the leg, allowing participants to rest between measurements. The highest value in Newton was selected for the analysis.
Up to 9 days
Balance
Balance was evaluated by the one-leg standing balance test (OLS), that measured the time that the patient balances on one leg as long as possible. The patient choose a leg to stand on (whichever he felt more comfortable with), flex the opposite knee allowing the foot to clear the floor, and balance on one leg. Higher values mean better balance.
Baseline
Balance
Balance was evaluated by the one-leg standing balance test (OLS), that measured the time that the patient balances on one leg as long as possible. The patient choose a leg to stand on (whichever he felt more comfortable with), flex the opposite knee allowing the foot to clear the floor, and balance on one leg. Higher values mean better balance.
Up to 9 days
Dyspnea
Dyspnea was assessed at rest using the modified Borg scale. Patients classified their breathlessness from 0 (no dyspnea) to10 (maximal dyspnea)
Baseline
Dyspnea
Dyspnea was assessed at rest using the modified Borg scale. Patients classified their breathlessness from 0 (no dyspnea) to10 (maximal dyspnea)
Up to 9 days
Fatigue
Fatigue was evaluated using the Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) that consists of 22 numerical items which assess multidimensional aspects of fatigue. The scale measures four dimensions of subjective fatigue: "behavioral/severity", relating to the severity, distress, and degree of disruption in activity of daily living; "affective meaning", relating to the emotional meaning attributed to fatigue; "sensory", relating to the physical symptoms of fatigue; and "cognitive/mood", relating to mental and mood states
Baseline
Fatigue
Fatigue was evaluated using the Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) that consists of 22 numerical items which assess multidimensional aspects of fatigue. The scale measures four dimensions of subjective fatigue: "behavioral/severity", relating to the severity, distress, and degree of disruption in activity of daily living; "affective meaning", relating to the emotional meaning attributed to fatigue; "sensory", relating to the physical symptoms of fatigue; and "cognitive/mood", relating to mental and mood states
Up to 9 days
Study Arms (3)
Global Exercise Group
EXPERIMENTALall patients received the Control Group treatment added to global exercise treatment. The program included 15 minutes of deep breathing exercises and 20-30 minutes of limb exercises. The exercises included global active range of motion (ROM) exercises and muscle strengthening like upper and lower limbs flexion-extension do single-leg stance, and sit to stand exercises. The number of repetitions was adapted to the subject's response taken into account the perceived dyspnea and fatigue during the exercise performance.
Functional Electrostimulation Group
EXPERIMENTALall patients received the Control Group treatment plus neuromuscular stimulation therapy (SEFAR Rehab X2, DJO France S.A.S., France) on quadriceps accompanied by lower limb exercises. The intervention was performed following the protocol described by Valenza et al (2017). Valenza MC, Torres-Sánchez I, López-López L, Cabrera-Martos I, Ortiz-Rubio A, Valenza-Demet G. Effects of home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jun;54(3):323-332. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04745-1. Epub 2017 Nov 16. PubMed PMID: 29144103.
Standard treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received standard medical and pharmacological care that consisted in systemic steroids, inhaled bronchodilators, oxygen, and a regimen of oral prednisone or its equivalent in doses of 40 to 60 mg per day for the duration of therapy as well as anti-biotic therapy.
Interventions
The program included 15 minutes of deep breathing exercises and 20-30 minutes of limb exercises. The exercises included global active range of motion (ROM) exercises and muscle strengthening like upper and lower limbs flexion-extension do single-leg stance, and sit to stand exercises
The program included a neuromuscular stimulation therapy on quadriceps accompanied by lower limb exercises. The intervention was performed following the protocol described by Valenza et al (2017). Valenza MC, Torres-Sánchez I, López-López L, Cabrera-Martos I, Ortiz-Rubio A, Valenza-Demet G. Effects of home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jun;54(3):323-332. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04745-1. Epub 2017 Nov 16. PubMed PMID: 29144103.
Patients received standard medical and pharmacological care that consisted in systemic steroids, inhaled bronchodilators, oxygen, and a regimen of oral prednisone or its equivalent in doses of 40 to 60 mg per day for the duration of therapy as well as anti-biotic therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients of both sexes
- A diagnosis of COPD made according to the criteria of the American Thoracic Society (ATS)
- With hypoxemia at rest defined as mean arterial oxygen saturation below 90%
- Agreed to participate
You may not qualify if:
- Unstable cardiovascular disease
- Orthopedic diseases in the upper and lower limbs
- Being in ICU or use of mechanical ventilation
- Motor sequelae from a neurological or cognitive impairment that interfere with the evaluation and the treatment
- Contraindications of electrotherapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Granada.
Granada, Granada, 18071, Spain
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marie Carmen Valenza, PhD
Universidad de Granada
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2020
First Posted
March 4, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
January 1, 2020
Study Completion
April 1, 2020
Last Updated
March 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03