Comparison of Clinical Effects of Azathioprine and Rituximab NMO-SD Patients
Comparison of Annual Relapse Rate, Expanded Disability Status Scale, and Side Effects Between Azathioprine and Rituximab in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders
1 other identifier
interventional
86
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare annual relapse rate, expanded disability status scale, and side effects of azathioprine and rituximab in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder during a one year follow up through a randomized clinical trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Sep 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 30, 2020
CompletedSeptember 30, 2020
September 1, 2020
1.2 years
December 21, 2016
October 2, 2018
September 29, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Annual Relapse Rate
annual relapse rate will be measured in the baseline (according to patients' history in the last year) and after 12 months of intervention.
one year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Expanded Disability Status Scale
one year
Other Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions
one year
Study Arms (2)
Azathioprine
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group will receive 50 mg of azathioprine, two times each day and gradually increased to maximum dose of 3 g daily with the aim of lymphocytes count less than 1500.
Rituximab
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group will receive 1g of Rituximab in 500 cc normal saline serum through intravenous infusion with two weeks intervals (as one course) and each course of treatment is repeated every 6 months.
Interventions
Patients are started with Azathioprine 50 mg tablets, taken orally twice a day. The medication dose is increased gradually with the aim of lymphocytes count bellow 1500 and to the maximum dose of 3 g Azathioprine per day. Cell blood count is checked once a week in the first month of treatment, once every two weeks in the second month of treatment, and monthly in the third month of treatment to make decision about medication dose.
Patients will receive 1 g of Rituximab (two vials of RediTux 500 mg/50 ml) in 500 cc normal saline serum through intravenous infusion and this will be repeated two weeks later. This cycle will be repeated every 6 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder based on the recent guidelines in 2015
- Expanded disability status scale between 0 and 7
- Age between 18 and 50 years old
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy or lactation during the study
- Deciding to leave the study by patient
- Lack of consent to enter the study
- Lack of cooperation for follow up
- Severe side effect of the medication
- Treatment with other immunosuppressant medications (including but not limited to cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, others) within two months before intervention
- Taking any other immunosuppressant or other type of medication (including herbal drugs) without permission of the physician during the study.
- Presence of other autoimmune disease (including but not limited to Behcet disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and others)
- Presence of liver disorders
- Presence of hematologic disorders
- Presence of heart failure
- Receipt of a live vaccine within 4 weeks prior to intervention
- Previous treatment with Azathioporine or Rituximab
- History of HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C
- Ongoing daily steroid use
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kashani Hospital
Isfahan, 8174673461, Iran
Related Publications (7)
Sato DK, Lana-Peixoto MA, Fujihara K, de Seze J. Clinical spectrum and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: evolution and current status. Brain Pathol. 2013 Nov;23(6):647-60. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12087.
PMID: 24118482BACKGROUNDMorrow MJ, Wingerchuk D. Neuromyelitis optica. J Neuroophthalmol. 2012 Jun;32(2):154-66. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e31825662f1.
PMID: 22617743BACKGROUNDCostanzi C, Matiello M, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG, Pittock SJ, Mandrekar J, Thapa P, McKeon A. Azathioprine: tolerability, efficacy, and predictors of benefit in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology. 2011 Aug 16;77(7):659-66. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822a2780. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
PMID: 21813788BACKGROUNDTrebst C, Jarius S, Berthele A, Paul F, Schippling S, Wildemann B, Borisow N, Kleiter I, Aktas O, Kumpfel T; Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica: recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). J Neurol. 2014 Jan;261(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7169-7. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
PMID: 24272588BACKGROUNDKim SH, Huh SY, Lee SJ, Joung A, Kim HJ. A 5-year follow-up of rituximab treatment in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. JAMA Neurol. 2013 Sep 1;70(9):1110-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3071.
PMID: 23897062BACKGROUNDKatz Sand I. Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016 Jun;22(3):864-96. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000337.
PMID: 27261687BACKGROUNDNikoo Z, Badihian S, Shaygannejad V, Asgari N, Ashtari F. Comparison of the efficacy of azathioprine and rituximab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurol. 2017 Sep;264(9):2003-2009. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8590-0. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
PMID: 28831548DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
lack of blinding, uneven assignment of patients to treatment groups, lack of compliance measures, and short follow-up duration
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Vahid Shaygannejad
- Organization
- Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Vahid Shaygannejad, M.D.
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Neurology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2016
First Posted
December 23, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 30, 2020
Results First Posted
September 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09