NCT02991040

Brief Summary

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Split-Face Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Revanesse® Ultra + (with Lidocaine) versus Revanesse® Ultra for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of Revanesse® Ultra + (with lidocaine, hereafter referred to as Revanesse Ultra +) to Revanesse Ultra for subjects undergoing correction of nasolabial folds (NLFs)

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 6, 2016

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 13, 2016

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2017

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 11, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

April 11, 2019

Status Verified

March 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

December 6, 2016

Results QC Date

October 1, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 19, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain at Injection as Measured by Subject on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale at Time 0 Minutes Post Injection

    Visual Analog Scale for Pain. A 100 mm scale with 0 mm being no pain (best outcome) to 100 mm being worst pain (worst outcome). The higher scores mean a worse outcome

    at injection Time 0

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Pain Measured by Subject on 100 mm VAS Scale at 15, 30, 45, and 60 Minutes Post Injection and at 2 Weeks Post Injection

    15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes post injection and at 2 weeks post injection

  • Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS)

    Visit 2/Day 14 (± 2 days), Visit 3/Day 28 (± 2 days), Visit 4/Day 84 (± 4 days), Visit 5/Day 168 (Week 24) (± 7 days)

  • Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement

    Visit 2/Day 14 (± 2 days), Visit 3/Day 28 (± 2 days), Visit 4/Day 84 (± 4 days), Visit 5/Day 168 (Week 24) (± 7 days)

  • Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement

    Visit 2/Day 14 (± 2 days), Visit 3/Day 28 (± 2 days), Visit 4/Day 84 (± 4 days), Visit 5/Day 168 (Week 24) (± 7 days)

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Safety and Tolerability of Revanesse Ultra and Revanesse Ultra+ Injection by Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

    at injection, Visit 2/Day 14 (± 2 days), Visit 3/Day 28 (± 2 days), Visit 4/Day 84 (± 4 days), Visit 5/Day 168 (Week 24) (± 7 days)

Study Arms (1)

Revanesse Ultra+

EXPERIMENTAL

Revanesse Ultra+ (with lidocaine) vs Revanesse Ultra without lidocaine

Device: Revanesse Ultra+ (with lidocaine)Device: Revanesse Ultra

Interventions

Bilateral nasolabial fold trial to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of Revanesse® Ultra + (with lidocaine) to Revanesse® Ultra (comparator)

Also known as: Revanesse Versa+
Revanesse Ultra+

Comparator without lidocaine

Also known as: Revanesse Versa
Revanesse Ultra+

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for the study:
  • Men or women 22 years of age or older seeking augmentation therapy for correction of bilateral nasolabial folds.
  • Two fully visible bilateral nasolabial folds each with a Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale Score (WSRS) of 3 or 4 that may be corrected with an injectable dermal filler. The NLFs should be symmetrical, i.e., WSRS scores at NLFs on both sides should be the same (both Moderate \[3\] or both Severe \[4\]).
  • If female and of childbearing potential, a negative urine pregnancy test and agree to use adequate contraception. Female subjects of childbearing potential (excluding women who are surgically sterilized or postmenopausal for at least 2 years) must have a negative urine pregnancy test and must be willing to use a medically accepted method of contraception during the study. The following are considered acceptable methods of birth control for the purpose of this study: oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches, contraceptive implant, vaginal contraceptive, double barrier methods (e.g., condom and spermicide), contraceptive injection (Depo-Provera®), intrauterine device (IUD), hormonal IUD (Mirena®), and abstinence with a documented second acceptable method of birth control if the subject becomes sexually active. Subjects entering the study who are on hormonal contraceptives must have been on the method for at least 90 days prior to the study and continue the method for the duration of the study. Subjects who had used hormonal contraception and stopped must have stopped no less than 90 days prior to Visit 1/Day 1.
  • Ability to understand and comply with the requirements of the study.
  • Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent. 6. Agree to refrain from seeking other treatment for this condition during the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
  • Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale Score of ≤ 2 on the right or left nasolabial fold.
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating.
  • Received prior dermabrasion, facelift, or Botox below the orbital rim, or had undergone procedures based on active dermal response (e.g., laser or chemical peeling procedures) within 6 months (180 days) prior to study entry.
  • Use of any facial tissue augmenting therapy with non-permanent filler or aesthetic facial surgical therapy within 9 months prior to study entry.
  • Has ever received semi-permanent fillers anywhere in the face or neck, or is planning to be implanted with these products during the study.
  • Has a permanent implant placed in the NLF area.
  • Evidence of scar-related disease or delayed healing activity within the past 1 year.
  • Scars at the intended treatment sites.
  • History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scars.
  • Any infection or unhealed wound on the face.
  • Allergic history including anaphylaxis, multiple severe allergies, atopy, or allergies to natural rubber latex, lidocaine or any amide-based anesthetic, hyaluronic acid products, or Streptococcal proteins or have plans to undergo desensitization therapy during the term of the study.
  • Aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 1 week (7 days) prior to treatment.
  • Concomitant anticoagulant therapy, antiplatelet therapy, or history of bleeding disorders, coagulation defects or connective tissue disorders.
  • Over-the-counter (OTC) wrinkle products or prescription wrinkle treatments within 4 weeks (28 days) prior to treatment and throughout the study.
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Tennessee Clinical Research Center

Nashville, Tennessee, 37215, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Mr. Ario Khoshbin
Organization
Prollenium Medical Technologies Inc.

Study Officials

  • Michael H. Gold, MD

    Tennessee Clinical Research, Inc

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The side of the face for each product was randomly assigned. The investigator performing the evaluations and the subject were blinded to the treatment; injections of the study product were performed by an unblinded injecting investigator.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Subjects were treated with Revanesse Ultra in the NLF on one side of the face and Revanesse Ultra+ in the NLF on the other side of the face. The side of the face for each study product was randomly assigned.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2016

First Posted

December 13, 2016

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion

August 1, 2017

Study Completion

August 1, 2017

Last Updated

April 11, 2019

Results First Posted

April 11, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations