Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Revanesse® Ultra Retreatment
Retreatment
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Split-Face Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Revanesse® Ultra (Retreatment)
1 other identifier
interventional
71
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
To compare improvement with retreatment for all subjects undergoing correction of nasolabial folds (NLFs) in the initial SYM2014-02 study, who were retreated with Revanesse Ultra at Visit 6/Week 24 and to determine the safety of repeat injections of Revanesse Ultra. The retreatment phase was optional.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 7, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 20, 2017
CompletedDecember 20, 2017
October 1, 2017
10 months
December 5, 2016
August 28, 2017
December 19, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) With Subjects From Both the Retreatment and the Optimal Correction Groups - WSRS Scores at Visit 8/Week 52
Change in the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) With Subjects From Both the Retreatment and the Optimal Correction Groups Achieving Similar WSRS Scores at Visit 8/Week 52 - WSRS Score categories: 1. Absent - No visible fold; continuous skin line. 2. Mild - Shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance. 3. Moderate - Moderately deep folds; clear facial feature visible at normal appearance but not when stretched; excellent correction is expected from injectable implant. 4. Severe - Very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant. 5. Extreme - Extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone. An increase in the WSRS score indicates a worsening of severity.
Visit 8/Week 52
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Retreatment Safety Assessed by the Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Which Were Defined, Recorded, Reported, and Evaluated, by Number and Severity
Visit 6/Week 24, Visit 7/Week 28, Visit 8/Week 52
Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement (pGAI) Score
Visit 8/Week 52
Study Arms (1)
Revanesse Ultra
EXPERIMENTALRevanesse Ultra open label retreatment
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects from the SYM2014-02 initial study who were:
- Men or women at least 22 years of age with two fully visible bilateral nasolabial folds each with a WSRS score of 3 or 4 (moderate or severe) that may have been corrected with an injectable dermal filler.
- Subjects were eligible for retreatment when WSRS scores had returned to baseline for either or both NLFs (retreatment group).
- If scores had not returned to baseline, subjects were also eligible to be injected for either one or both NLFs as needed to achieve optimal correction (optimal correction group).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ario Khoshbin, President
- Organization
- Prollenium Medical Technologies, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael H Gold, MD
Tennessee Clinical Research Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2016
First Posted
December 7, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
December 20, 2017
Results First Posted
December 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10