Multicenter Double-Blind Randomized Split-Face Study to Evaluate Revanesse® Ultra vs Restylane® for Correction of NLF
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Split-Face Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Revanesse® Ultra Versus Restylane® for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
1 other identifier
interventional
163
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
A randomized, multicenter, double blind, split-face study in subjects seeking NLF correction. Subjects were treated with Revanesse Ultra in the NLF on one side of the face and Restylane in the NLF on the other side of the face. The side of the face for each product was randomly assigned. The investigator performing the evaluations and the subject were blinded to the treatment; injections of the study product were performed by an unblinded injecting investigator.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 13, 2017
CompletedFebruary 22, 2018
November 1, 2017
10 months
December 5, 2016
August 25, 2017
January 24, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary Efficacy Variable is Change From Baseline to Visit 6/Week 24 in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) Score
Primary efficacy variable is change from Baseline to Visit 6/Week 24 in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) - Treatment success is defined as at least a 1-grade improvement in WSRS from baseline to Week 24 WSRS Score categories: 1. Absent - No visible fold; continuous skin line. 2. Mild - Shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance. 3. Moderate - Moderately deep folds; clear facial feature visible at normal appearance but not when stretched; excellent correction is expected from injectable implant. 4. Severe - Very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant. 5. Extreme - Extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone.
Visit 6/Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary Efficacy Endpoints Are the Responder Rate, Percentage of *Nasolabial Folds* With Treatment Success
Visit 6/Week 24
Other Outcomes (3)
Other Efficacy Variables Include Change in WSRS Score
Visit 2/Week 1, Visit 3/Week 2, Visit 4/Week 4, and Visit 5/Week 12
Other Efficacy Variables Include Change in Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement (pGAI) Score
Visit 2/Week 1, Visit 3/Week 2, Visit 4/Week 4, and Visit 5/Week 12
Other Efficacy Variables Include Change in Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement (iGAI) Score
Visit 2/Week 1, Visit 3/Week 2, Visit 4/Week 4, and Visit 5/Week 12
Study Arms (2)
Revanesse Ultra
EXPERIMENTALRevanesse Ultra in the NLF on one side of the face
Restylane
ACTIVE COMPARATORRestylane injection in the NLF on the other side of the face to optimal correction
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for the study:
- Men or women 22 years of age or older.
- Two fully visible bilateral nasolabial folds each with a Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale Score of 3 or 4 that may be corrected with an injectable dermal filler.
- If female and of childbearing potential, a negative urine pregnancy test and agree to use adequate contraception. Female subjects of childbearing potential (excluding women who are surgically sterilized or postmenopausal for at least 2 years) must have a negative urine pregnancy test and must be willing to use a medically accepted method of contraception during the study. The following are considered acceptable methods of birth control for the purpose of this study: oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches, contraceptive implant, vaginal contraceptive, double barrier methods (e.g., condom and spermicide), contraceptive injection (Depo-Provera®), intrauterine device (IUD), hormonal IUD (Mirena®), and abstinence with a documented second acceptable method of birth control if the subject becomes sexually active. Subjects entering the study who are on hormonal contraceptives must have been on the method for at least 90 days prior to the study and continue the method for the duration of the study. Subjects who had used hormonal contraception and stopped must have stopped no less than 90 days prior to Visit 1/Day 1.
- Ability to understand and comply with the requirements of the study.
- Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent.
- Agree to refrain from seeking other treatment for this condition during the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
- Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale Score of ≤ 2 on the right or left nasolabial fold.
- Women who are pregnant or lactating.
- Received prior dermabrasion, facelift, or Botox below the orbital rim within 6 months (180 days) prior to entry into the study.
- Previous tissue augmentation (bulking agents) for facial wrinkles and scars within 6 months (180 days) at the proposed injection sites.
- Previous tissue augmentation with permanent implants.
- Evidence of scar-related disease or delayed healing activity within the past 1 year.
- Scars at the intended treatment sites.
- History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scars.
- Any infection or wound on the face.
- Allergic history including anaphylaxis or multiple severe allergies to natural rubber latex or lidocaine.
- Aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 1 week (7 days) prior to treatment.
- Concomitant anticoagulant therapy, antiplatelet therapy, or history of bleeding disorders or connective tissue disorders.
- Over-the-counter (OTC) wrinkle products or prescription wrinkle treatments within 4 weeks (28 days) prior to treatment and throughout the study.
- Immunocompromised or immunosuppressed.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ario Khoshbin, President
- Organization
- Prollenium Medical Technologies, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael H Gold, MD
Tennessee Clinical Research Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2016
First Posted
December 8, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 22, 2018
Results First Posted
December 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11