Melancholic Symptoms in Bipolar Depression and Responsiveness to Lamotrigine
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with melancholic bipolar II depression are more responsive to lamotrigine than patients with non-melancholic bipolar II depression. To do this, the investigators will re-analyze a previous clinical trial that evaluated lamotrigine as a treatment for bipolar II depression (GSK-SCA100223; NCT00274677).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 depression
Started Nov 2003
Longer than P75 for phase_4 depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 15, 2019
CompletedFebruary 15, 2019
September 1, 2018
1.8 years
December 8, 2016
December 27, 2017
September 19, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (18)
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Change Scores
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. This outcome is a change score calculated by subtracting Baseline from Week 8 scores. Lower scores indicate greater improvement of depressive symptoms.
Eight weeks
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Change Scores
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. This outcome is a change score calculated by subtracting Baseline from Week 8 scores. Lower scores indicate greater improvement of depressive symptoms.
Eight weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Eight weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Seven weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Six weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Five weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Four weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Three weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Two weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
One week
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Eight weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Seven weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Six weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Five weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Four weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Three weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Two weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
One week
Study Arms (4)
Lamotrigine - melancholic depression
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with melancholic depression who were randomly assigned to receive lamotrigine tablets escalated to a target dose of 200mg/day.
Placebo - melancholic depression
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants with melancholic depression who were randomly assigned to receive a placebo comparator.
Lamotrigine - nonmelancholic depression
EXPERIMENTALParticipants not meeting DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for melancholic depression who were randomly assigned to receive lamotrigine tablets escalated to a target dose of 200mg/day.
Placebo - nonmelancholic depression
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants not meeting DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for melancholic depression who were randomly assigned to receive a placebo comparator.
Interventions
Lamotrigine tablets at dosages of 25mg/day for Week 1 and Week 2, 50mg/day for Week 3 and Week 4, 100mg/day for Week 5, and 200mg/day for Week 6, Week 7, and Week 8.
Placebo tablets
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must provide written and informed consent.
- Diagnosis of Bipolar II Disorder and currently depressed for minimum of the last 8 weeks, with a HAMD-17 score of at least 18 with scores of 3 or more on Items 1 or 7.
- For females, be of non-childbearing potential, or of childbearing potential with a negative pregnancy test at screening and agrees to one of (a) abstinence from sex two weeks prior and five days after drug continuation/discontinuation, (b) personal or partner sterilization, (c) one method of hormonal contraception, or (d) two barrier methods of contraception.
- Acceptable results (within two times the normal limit) on laboratory screening tests (e.g., thyroid function).
You may not qualify if:
- Active suicidality.
- History of non-response to antidepressant treatment, or any previous treatment with lamotrigine.
- History of substance dependence in the past year, or abuse within the 4 weeks prior to study entry.
- Rapid cycling bipolar disorder.
- Receiving additional psychoactive medication (not including lorazepam for agitation), or has started a new course of psychotherapy within the last month.
- Received treatment for an anxiety or eating disorder within the last 12 months.
- Investigational drug use within the last month.
- History of epilepsy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Saskatchewanlead
- GlaxoSmithKlinecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Psychiatry, Royal University Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N0W8, Canada
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
1. Short duration of trial in context of slow dosing regime 2. Inability to assess other definitions of melancholia 3. Sample of only bipolar II depression
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Evyn Peters
- Organization
- Univeristy of Saskatchewan
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rudy C Bowen, FRCPC
University of Saskatchewan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2016
First Posted
December 12, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2003
Primary Completion
August 1, 2005
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 15, 2019
Results First Posted
February 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Patient-level data for the study (GSK-SCA100223; NCT00274677) is available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.