NCT02985515

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research study is to examine the efficacy of a 12-week smell training intervention for participants with olfactory dysfunction following an infection of the upper respiratory tract.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
51

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 28, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 7, 2016

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 20, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 20, 2019

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 4, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

November 4, 2022

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

December 3, 2016

Results QC Date

April 14, 2021

Last Update Submit

November 3, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

AnosmiaHyposmiaIntranasal Steroid IrrigationOlfactory NeuroplasticityOlfactory training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pre- and Post-intervention Difference in Functional Connectivity Before and After Smell Training.

    Baseline and post-intervention connectivity within and between regions of interest in the olfactory and olfactory related networks using resting state fMRI will be obtained. Resting-state connectivity was analyzed using the CONN toolbox version 18b (https://web.conn-toolbox.org/) and SPM12, version 7487 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging). Functional connectivity values (Fisher z-transformed Pearson correlation coefficients) were compared using a paired, 2-tailed t test and corrected for multiple comparisons. p\<0.05 was considered to be significant.

    12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Pre- and Post-intervention Difference in Smell Testing Before and After Budesonide Treatment

    30 days

  • Subjective Response to Smell Training Intervention

    12 weeks

  • Comparison of Olfactory Network in Healthy Controls to Study Participants

    1 week

  • Pre- and Post-intervention Difference in Smell Testing Before and After Smell Training

    12 weeks

  • Pre and Post Difference in QOD-NS After Smell Training

    12 weeks

Study Arms (3)

Budesonide Nasal Irrigation

NO INTERVENTION

30-day run-in course of budesonide nasal irrigation. 1-month supply of budesonide capsules, an 8-oz sinus rinse bottle, and a 1-month supply of commercially prepared isotonic salt packets. Participants were instructed to dissolve 2 budesonide capsules (0.5mg per capsule) into the sinus rinse bottle along with the saline mixture and then irrigate both nasal cavities once daily.

Budesonide Nasal Irrigation + Smell Training

EXPERIMENTAL

Budesonide nasal irrigation + smell training for 12 weeks

Behavioral: Smell training

Controls

NO INTERVENTION

Baseline olfaction testing and rs-fMRI

Interventions

Smell trainingBEHAVIORAL

Participants will be provided with 4 vials of essential odors. Participants will sniff each scent for 20-30 seconds, twice daily, for 12 weeks. The participant will take 30 seconds of rest between each scent. All participants will undergo this smell training regimen for 12 weeks.

Also known as: Olfactory Training
Budesonide Nasal Irrigation + Smell Training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18 and 70
  • Anosmia or hyposmia (UPSIT \<34 (male), UPSIT \<34 (female); Sniffin' Sticks threshold below 5.5)

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to understand English
  • Current smoker or history of smoking within the past 6 months
  • Current nasal polyps
  • Exposure to head and or/neck radiation
  • Exposure to chemotherapy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Deems DA, Doty RL, Settle RG, Moore-Gillon V, Shaman P, Mester AF, Kimmelman CP, Brightman VJ, Snow JB Jr. Smell and taste disorders, a study of 750 patients from the University of Pennsylvania Smell and Taste Center. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991 May;117(5):519-28. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870170065015.

    PMID: 2021470BACKGROUND
  • Doty RL, Frye RE, Agrawal U. Internal consistency reliability of the fractionated and whole University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test. Percept Psychophys. 1989 May;45(5):381-4. doi: 10.3758/bf03210709.

    PMID: 2726398BACKGROUND
  • Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G. 'Sniffin' sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses. 1997 Feb;22(1):39-52. doi: 10.1093/chemse/22.1.39.

    PMID: 9056084BACKGROUND
  • Kobal G, Hummel T, Sekinger B, Barz S, Roscher S, Wolf S. "Sniffin' sticks": screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology. 1996 Dec;34(4):222-6.

    PMID: 9050101BACKGROUND
  • Coldwell SE, Mennella JA, Duffy VB, Pelchat ML, Griffith JW, Smutzer G, Cowart BJ, Breslin PA, Bartoshuk LM, Hastings L, Victorson D, Hoffman HJ. Gustation assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11 Suppl 3):S20-4. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872e38.

    PMID: 23479539BACKGROUND
  • Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Hayes JE, Moskowitz HR, Snyder DJ. Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Jul 29;361(1471):1137-48. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1853.

    PMID: 16815797BACKGROUND
  • Pepino MY, Finkbeiner S, Beauchamp GK, Mennella JA. Obese women have lower monosodium glutamate taste sensitivity and prefer higher concentrations than do normal-weight women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 May;18(5):959-65. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.493. Epub 2010 Jan 14.

    PMID: 20075854BACKGROUND
  • Cicerale S, Breslin PA, Beauchamp GK, Keast RS. Sensory characterization of the irritant properties of oleocanthal, a natural anti-inflammatory agent in extra virgin olive oils. Chem Senses. 2009 May;34(4):333-9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjp006. Epub 2009 Mar 8.

    PMID: 19273462BACKGROUND
  • Keast RS, Roper J. A complex relationship among chemical concentration, detection threshold, and suprathreshold intensity of bitter compounds. Chem Senses. 2007 Mar;32(3):245-53. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjl052. Epub 2007 Jan 13.

    PMID: 17220518BACKGROUND
  • Cowart BJ. Relationships between taste and smell across the adult life span. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1989;561:39-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb20968.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 2735688BACKGROUND
  • Hummel T, Rissom K, Reden J, Hahner A, Weidenbecher M, Huttenbrink KB. Effects of olfactory training in patients with olfactory loss. Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):496-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.20101.

    PMID: 19235739BACKGROUND
  • Stamps JJ, Bartoshuk LM, Heilman KM. A brief olfactory test for Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2013 Oct 15;333(1-2):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.06.033. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

    PMID: 23927938BACKGROUND
  • Tepper BJ, Christensen CM, Cao J. Development of brief methods to classify individuals by PROP taster status. Physiol Behav. 2001 Jul;73(4):571-7. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00500-5.

    PMID: 11495661BACKGROUND
  • Pekala K, Chandra RK, Turner JH. Efficacy of olfactory training in patients with olfactory loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Mar;6(3):299-307. doi: 10.1002/alr.21669. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

    PMID: 26624966BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anosmia

Interventions

Olfactory Training

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Olfaction DisordersSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Therapeutics

Results Point of Contact

Title
Pawina JIramongkolchai, MD
Organization
Washington University in St. Louis

Study Officials

  • Jay F Piccirillo, MD

    Washington University School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a prospective cohort, pre- and post-intervention study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2016

First Posted

December 7, 2016

Study Start

September 28, 2016

Primary Completion

November 20, 2019

Study Completion

November 20, 2019

Last Updated

November 4, 2022

Results First Posted

November 4, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Locations