Mentored Research on Improving Alcohol Brief Interventions in Medical Settings
1 other identifier
interventional
93
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The NIAAA estimates that 16% (40 million) of adults in the US are drinking at unsafe levels. More than 50% of alcohol health consequences occur in risky, non-dependent drinkers. Increasing the efficacy and efficiency of brief interventions in medical setting could significantly reduce the public health impacts of risky drinking. There is intense interest in conducting motivational interviewing (MI) informed brief interventions for risky alcohol use in medical settings, but little empirical information is available regarding which MI behavioral and interpersonal style components drive effectiveness. The field would benefit greatly from empirically-based Stage 1 treatment development and modeling studies to delineate the degree to which adding motivational interviewing components to brief intervention improves outcome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 28, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2017
CompletedOctober 11, 2018
October 1, 2018
3.2 years
November 28, 2016
October 10, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number days Exceeded Recommended Drinking Limits
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Drinks Per Drinking Day
30 days
Percent Days Abstinent
30 days
Study Arms (3)
Brief Advice
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe brief advice protocol was designed by removing MI-consistent elements from the NIAAA Clinician's Guide. The protocol involves screening and assessment using the NIAAA pre-screen and single-question screen and assessing for quantity and frequency. Patients exceeding recommended limits receive feedback, information, and advice to cut down drinking to recommended levels. All patients are provided with a tip sheet on strategies for cutting down and encouraged to follow-up with a behavioral health provider with any questions or concerns.
NIAAA Clinician's Guide
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe NIAAA brief intervention was adapted directly from the NIAAA publication "Helping Patients Who Drink Too Much: A Clinician's Guide". The protocol screens using the NIAAA pre-screen and single-questions. Patients exceeding recommended limits receive feedback, information, and advice to cut down. For patients unwilling to make a change, the clinician restates their concern, encourages self reflection by asking the patient about reasons to cut down on drinking and barriers to change, and reaffirms willingness to help. For patients willing to make a change, the clinician helps the patient develop a plan to cut down within maximum limits, agree on specific steps and strategies, and provides a tip sheet on strategies for cutting down.
Motivational Interviewing (MI)
EXPERIMENTALThe MI intervention condition was also adapted from the NIAAA Clinician's Guide, with additional modification to include elements of MI. Clinicians normalize Screening and Brief Intervention (SBI) and ask the patient's permission before discussing alcohol use. The NIAAA pre-screen and single-question screen are administered. Assessment of quantity, frequency, and Alcohol Use Disorder symptoms is done using open questions. The ask-tell-ask technique is used to share feedback and exchange information regarding U.S adult drinking patterns. For patients low in readiness to make a change, clinicians build readiness using structured MI tools. For patients high in readiness to change, the ask-tell-ask technique is used to explore strategies for cutting down and develop an action plan.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States
Related Publications (1)
Hettema JE, Cockrell SA, Reeves A, Ingersoll KS, Lum PJ, Saitz R, Murray-Krezan CM, Carrejo VA. Development and differentiability of three brief interventions for risky alcohol use that include varying doses of motivational interviewing. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018 Feb 27;13(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13722-017-0102-0.
PMID: 29482632DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer Hettema, PhD
The University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2016
First Posted
November 30, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2017
Study Completion
September 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 11, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share