A Telerehabilitation Intervention to Improve Activity and Participation Among Adults Following Acquired Brain Injury
Effectiveness of a Telerehabilitation Intervention to Improve Activity and Participation Among Adults Following Acquired Brain Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
25
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Objectives - To evaluate the effectiveness of an telerehabilitation intervention program among acquired brain injury (ABI) survivors in the chronic phase. The aim of the intervention is to improve the transition from rehabilitation units to community dwelling and facilitate activity and participation in life roles in the community. Working hypothesis - The telerehabilitation based program for ABI survivors will be effective in:
- 1.Improving function in activities of daily living, participation in occupations and health related quality of life.
- 2.Reducing the need for outpatient clinic and rehabilitation services.
- 3.The intervention achievements will be maintained in 3-month follow-up
- 4.The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
- 5.The Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS)
- 6.Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4)
- 7.The Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX)
- 8.The New General Self-Efficacy Scale (NGSE)
- 9.The Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale short version
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 28, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedFebruary 1, 2022
January 1, 2022
4 years
November 28, 2016
January 17, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
The COPM is a semi-structured interview to facilitate client-centered goal setting and measure the client's perceived occupational performance and satisfaction levels.
6 months: baseline, post intervention (after 3 months), follow-up (after 3 more months)
The Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS)
The PQRS is an observational measure of activity performance.
6 months: baseline, post intervention (after 3 months), follow-up (after 3 more months)
The Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4)
The MPAI-4 measures the recovery progress of people after an ABI and includes 29 items grouped into three subscales: (a) Ability (e.g., motor, sensory and cognitive abilities), (b) Adaptation (e.g., emotional state and social interactions), and (c) Participation (e.g., leisure activities, employment and transportation).
6 months: baseline, post intervention (after 3 months), follow-up (after 3 more months)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX)
6 months: baseline, post intervention (after 3 months), follow-up (after 3 more months)
The New General Self-Efficacy Scale (NGSE)
6 months: baseline, post intervention (after 3 months), follow-up (after 3 more months)
the Short Form Zarit Burden Interview
6 months: baseline, post intervention (after 3 months), follow-up (after 3 more months)
Other Outcomes (2)
Satisfaction questionnaire
Post intervention
Background questionnaire
6 months: baseline, post intervention (after 3 months), follow-up (after 3 more months)
Study Arms (2)
Tele-CO-OP
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention included weekly videoconferencing sessions using the Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance approach (tele-CO-OP) over a period of three months. Participant identified five functional goals, of which three were directly addressed.
Waitlist control
NO INTERVENTIONThe waitlist control group did not receive the intervention during the same time period
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- (1) ≥ 6 months post-ABI; (2) age ≥ 18 years; (3) sufficient proficiency in Hebrew or English to participate in the study; (4) modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores of 2-4 reflecting slight to moderate disability \[38\]; (5) self-reported unmet functional goals; (6) internet access at home; and (7) had an adult significant other who agreed to be involved in the study
You may not qualify if:
- (1) moderate or severe aphasia; (2) a score of \<21 on the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores: MOCA\<19; (3) dementia diagnosis; (3) an acute illness which significantly impacts the ability to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2016
First Posted
November 30, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
February 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01