NCT02959840

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of acupressure point P6 stimulation versus intravenous ondansetron plus metoclopramide versus no antiemetic prophylaxis during elective cesarean section under regional anesthesia.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2015

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2015

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 10, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 9, 2016

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 25, 2017

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 23, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

September 25, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

October 10, 2016

Results QC Date

April 20, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 27, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Nausea

    The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that experience nausea at any point during the surgical procedure in each group.

    During the surgical procedure

  • Vomiting

    The investigators will perform objective assessments of whether or not the patients have vomited during the procedure. The investigators will then analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that vomit in each group.

    During the surgical procedure

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Nausea During Stage I (After the Administration of CSE and Until Eversion of the Uterus)

    During the surgical procedure

  • Nausea During Stage II (After Eversion of the Uterus and Until Replacement of the Uterus)

    During the surgical procedure

  • Nausea During Stage III (After Replacement of the Uterus and to the Next 15 Minutes)

    During the surgical procedure

  • Nausea During Stage IV (the Rest of the Time Until Arrival at PACU)

    During the surgical procedure

  • Vomiting During Stage I (After the Administration of CSE and Until Eversion of the Uterus)

    During the surgical procedure

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Control

NO INTERVENTION

No anti-emetic medications and no acupuncture point P6 stimulation prior to administration of the standardized regional anesthesia

Metoclopramide, Ondansetron

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

10 mg Metoclopramide IV and 8 mg of Ondansetron IV immediately prior to administration of the standardized regional anesthesia

Drug: MetoclopramideDrug: Ondansetron

Acupressure Point P6 stimulator

EXPERIMENTAL

Acupuncture point P6 stimulation. This is a stimulation of the chi channel at the master of the heart (MH8 position) at the small depression of the volar surface of the distal right forearm just above the crest of the wrist. The device will be put on the patients in the operating room prior to administration of the regional anesthesia and will be removed after the cesarean section is complete.

Device: Acupressure Point P6 stimulator

Interventions

This device stimulates the chi channel at the master of the heart (MH8 position) at the small depression of the volar surface of the distal right forearm just above the crest of the wrist. The device is placed on patients in the operating room prior to administration of the regional anesthesia and will be removed after the cesarean section is complete. The device is removed from the patient in the operating room, before the patient is transported to the recovery room. Patients receive continuous stimulation at a level that is comfortable for the patient prior to administration of the standardized regional anesthesia.

Acupressure Point P6 stimulator

10 mg Reglan IV immediately prior to administration of the standardized regional anesthesia.

Also known as: Reglan
Metoclopramide, Ondansetron

8 mg of Zofran IV immediately prior to administration of the standardized regional anesthesia.

Also known as: Zofran
Metoclopramide, Ondansetron

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Female subjects ages 18 to 45
  • Subjects with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I or II
  • Subjects with elective primary or repeat cesarean delivery
  • Subjects who receive combined spinal epidural anesthesia
  • English and non-English speaking subjects will be included in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Female subjects \<18 years of age
  • Subjects requiring emergent cesarean delivery
  • History of placenta accrete
  • Multiple gestation pregnancy
  • ASA status III or higher
  • Current history of pregnancy induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or eclampsia
  • History of any chronic medication use (other than prenatal vitamins), including inhaler medications
  • Current urinary tract infection, pneumonia, or otitis media

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Afolabi BB, Lesi FE. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004350. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3.

    PMID: 23076903BACKGROUND
  • Arnberger M, Stadelmann K, Alischer P, Ponert R, Melber A, Greif R. Monitoring of neuromuscular blockade at the P6 acupuncture point reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology. 2007 Dec;107(6):903-8. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000290617.98058.d9.

    PMID: 18043058BACKGROUND
  • Chen HM, Chang FY, Hsu CT. Effect of acupressure on nausea, vomiting, anxiety and pain among post-cesarean section women in Taiwan. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2005 Aug;21(8):341-50. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70132-9.

    PMID: 16158876BACKGROUND
  • Duggal KN, Douglas MJ, Peteru EA, Merrick PM. Acupressure for intrathecal narcotic-induced nausea and vomiting after caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998 Oct;7(4):231-6. doi: 10.1016/s0959-289x(98)80044-7.

    PMID: 15321185BACKGROUND
  • Fan CF, Tanhui E, Joshi S, Trivedi S, Hong Y, Shevde K. Acupressure treatment for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 1997 Apr;84(4):821-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199704000-00023.

    PMID: 9085965BACKGROUND
  • Gan TJ, Jiao KR, Zenn M, Georgiade G. A randomized controlled comparison of electro-acupoint stimulation or ondansetron versus placebo for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2004 Oct;99(4):1070-1075. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130355.91214.9E.

    PMID: 15385352BACKGROUND
  • Golembiewski J, Chernin E, Chopra T. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Jun 15;62(12):1247-60; quiz 1261-2. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/62.12.1247.

    PMID: 15947124BACKGROUND
  • Habib AS, Itchon-Ramos N, Phillips-Bute BG, Gan TJ; Duke Women's Anesthesia (DWA) Research Group. Transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation with the ReliefBand for the prevention of nausea and vomiting during and after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):581-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000189217.19600.5c.

    PMID: 16428565BACKGROUND
  • Harmon D, Ryan M, Kelly A, Bowen M. Acupressure and prevention of nausea and vomiting during and after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Apr;84(4):463-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013471.

    PMID: 10823097BACKGROUND
  • Ho CM, Hseu SS, Tsai SK, Lee TY. Effect of P-6 acupressure on prevention of nausea and vomiting after epidural morphine for post-cesarean section pain relief. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 Mar;40(3):372-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1996.tb04448.x.

    PMID: 8721471BACKGROUND
  • Ho CM, Tsai HJ, Chan KH, Tsai SK. P6 acupressure does not prevent emesis during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102(3):900-3. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000195553.82409.00.

    PMID: 16492848BACKGROUND
  • Lewis IH, Pryn SJ, Reynolds PI, Pandit UA, Wilton NC. Effect of P6 acupressure on postoperative vomiting in children undergoing outpatient strabismus correction. Br J Anaesth. 1991 Jul;67(1):73-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/67.1.73.

    PMID: 1859764BACKGROUND
  • Stein DJ, Birnbach DJ, Danzer BI, Kuroda MM, Grunebaum A, Thys DM. Acupressure versus intravenous metoclopramide to prevent nausea and vomiting during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesth Analg. 1997 Feb;84(2):342-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199702000-00018.

    PMID: 9024025BACKGROUND
  • White PF, Issioui T, Hu J, Jones SB, Coleman JE, Waddle JP, Markowitz SD, Coloma M, Macaluso AR, Ing CH. Comparative efficacy of acustimulation (ReliefBand) versus ondansetron (Zofran) in combination with droperidol for preventing nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology. 2002 Nov;97(5):1075-81. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200211000-00008.

    PMID: 12411789BACKGROUND
  • Zarate E, Mingus M, White PF, Chiu JW, Scuderi P, Loskota W, Daneshgari V. The use of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation for preventing nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001 Mar;92(3):629-35. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200103000-00014.

    PMID: 11226090BACKGROUND
  • Griffiths JD, Gyte GM, Popham PA, Williams K, Paranjothy S, Broughton HK, Brown HC, Thomas J. Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 18;5(5):CD007579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007579.pub3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NauseaVomitingPersonal Satisfaction

Interventions

MetoclopramideOndansetron

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BenzamidesAmidesOrganic Chemicalspara-AminobenzoatesAminobenzoatesBenzoatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsChlorobenzoatesHydroxybenzoate EthersHydroxybenzoatesHydroxy AcidsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsPhenyl EthersPhenolsImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsCarbazolesIndolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Shaul Cohen, M.D., Professor of Clinical Anesthesiology, Director of Obstetric Anesthesia
Organization
Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School

Study Officials

  • Shaul Cohen, MD

    Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Obstetric Anesthesia

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2016

First Posted

November 9, 2016

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion

March 1, 2016

Study Completion

August 23, 2017

Last Updated

September 25, 2017

Results First Posted

July 25, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations