NCT02960113

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of reducing intra-cesarean section nausea and vomiting with regional anesthesia in subjects who will receive scopolamine patch with acupressure point P6 stimulation versus subjects that receive just scopolamine patch versus subjects that receive just acupressure point P6 stimulation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
240

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2016

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 7, 2016

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 9, 2016

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2021

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 28, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 28, 2022

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5.3 years

First QC Date

November 7, 2016

Results QC Date

August 7, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 25, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

cesarean sectionacupressure point p6scopolamine patch

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Patients With Nausea

    The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that experience nausea at any point during the surgical procedure in each group.

    Throughout the entire surgical procedure

  • Number of Patients With Vomiting

    The investigators will perform objective assessments of whether or not the patients have vomited during the procedure. The investigators will then analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that vomit in each group.

    Throughout the surgical procedure

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Satisfaction With Intraoperative Antiemetic Treatment

    Throughout the surgical procedure

  • Level of Nausea After the Administration of the Regional Anesthesia Medications

    From administration of anaesthesia until eversion of uterus

  • Level of Nausea After Eversion of the Uterus

    After eversion of the uterus until replacement of the uterus

  • Level of Nausea After Replacement of the Uterus

    After replacement of the uterus and to the next 15 minutes

  • Level of Nausea Upon Arrival to the Post-operative Recovery Room

    15 minutes after replacement of the uterus to arrival at post-anaesthesia care unit

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

scopolamine patch

EXPERIMENTAL

Scopolamine patch will be placed on the skin behind the right ear 1 hour before initiation of the regional anesthesia for the duration of surgery.

Drug: scopolamine patch

acupressure point P6

EXPERIMENTAL

Acupressure point P6 stimulation will be placed on the distal right forearm just above the crest of the wrist.

Device: acupressure point P6

scopolamine patch + acupressure point P6

EXPERIMENTAL

Will receive both scopolamine patch and acupressure point P6 stimulation, as described above.

Drug: scopolamine patchDevice: acupressure point P6

Interventions

Group I (n=80): Will receive scopolamine patch placement on the skin behind the right ear 1 hour before initiation of the regional anesthesia for the duration of surgery. The time of the application of the patch will be recorded, and the time of the start of the surgery will be recorded. The last time point for evaluation of patient's nausea/vomiting will be when the patient arrives to the post anesthesia care unit. A member of the research team will remove the patch from the patient and properly dispose the patch upon arrival to the post anesthesia care unit.

Also known as: Transderm-Scop, Scopace, Maldemar
scopolamine patchscopolamine patch + acupressure point P6

Group II (n=80): Will receive acupressure point P6 stimulation. This is a stimulation of the chi channel at the master of the heart (MH8 position) at the small depression of the volar surface of the distal right forearm just above the crest of the wrist. The device will be put on the patients in the operating room prior to administration of the regional anesthesia and will be removed after the cesarean section is complete. The device will be removed from the patient in the operating room, before the patient is transported to the recovery room. Patients will receive continuous stimulation at a level that is comfortable for her prior to administration of the standardized regional anesthesia.

acupressure point P6scopolamine patch + acupressure point P6

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Female subjects ages 18 to 45
  • Subjects with ASA Class I or II
  • Subjects with elective primary or repeat cesarean delivery
  • Subjects who receive spinal and/or epidural anesthesia
  • English and non-English speaking subjects will be included in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Female subjects \<18 years of age
  • Subjects requiring emergent cesarean delivery
  • Gestational age \< 37 weeks
  • History of placenta accreta
  • Multiple gestation pregnancy
  • ASA status III or higher
  • Current history of pregnancy induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or eclampsia
  • History of any chronic medication use (other than prenatal vitamins), including inhaler medications
  • Current urinary tract infection, pneumonia, or otitis media
  • Coagulopathies or skin infections overlying the spine
  • History of open angle glaucoma, seizures or psychosis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Hawkins JL, Koonin LM, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979-1990. Anesthesiology. 1997 Feb;86(2):277-84. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199702000-00002.

    PMID: 9054245BACKGROUND
  • Ezri T, Szmuk P, Evron S, Geva D, Hagay Z, Katz J. Difficult airway in obstetric anesthesia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001 Oct;56(10):631-41. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200110000-00022.

    PMID: 11590314BACKGROUND
  • Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Stark M, Pontrelli G, Brizzi A, Wetzl RG, Benhamou D. Low-dose sequential combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia in elective Stark caesarean section: a preliminary cohort study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010 Mar;14(3):215-21.

    PMID: 20391961BACKGROUND
  • Afolabi BB, Lesi FE. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004350. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3.

    PMID: 23076903BACKGROUND
  • Riley ET, Cohen SE, Macario A, Desai JB, Ratner EF. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of time efficiency, costs, charges, and complications. Anesth Analg. 1995 Apr;80(4):709-12. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199504000-00010.

    PMID: 7893022BACKGROUND
  • Balki M, Carvalho JC. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean section under regional anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Jul;14(3):230-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.004.

    PMID: 15935649BACKGROUND
  • Paranjothy S, Griffiths JD, Broughton HK, Gyte GM, Brown HC, Thomas J. Interventions at caesarean section for reducing the risk of aspiration pneumonitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 5;2014(2):CD004943. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004943.pub4.

    PMID: 24497372BACKGROUND
  • Flake ZA, Linn BS, Hornecker JR. Practical selection of antiemetics in the ambulatory setting. Am Fam Physician. 2015 Mar 1;91(5):293-6.

    PMID: 25822385BACKGROUND
  • Golembiewski J, Chernin E, Chopra T. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Jun 15;62(12):1247-60; quiz 1261-2. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/62.12.1247.

    PMID: 15947124BACKGROUND
  • Apfel CC, Zhang K, George E, Shi S, Jalota L, Hornuss C, Fero KE, Heidrich F, Pergolizzi JV, Cakmakkaya OS, Kranke P. Transdermal scopolamine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2010 Nov;32(12):1987-2002. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.11.014.

    PMID: 21118734BACKGROUND
  • Renner UD, Oertel R, Kirch W. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in clinical use of scopolamine. Ther Drug Monit. 2005 Oct;27(5):655-65. doi: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000168293.48226.57.

    PMID: 16175141BACKGROUND
  • Lee A, Fan LT. Stimulation of the wrist acupuncture point P6 for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003281.pub3.

    PMID: 19370583BACKGROUND
  • Allen TK, Habib AS. P6 stimulation for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2008 Oct;107(4):1308-12. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1864.

    PMID: 18806045BACKGROUND
  • Quinla JD, Hill DA. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Jul 1;68(1):121-8.

    PMID: 12887118BACKGROUND
  • Belluomini J, Litt RC, Lee KA, Katz M. Acupressure for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a randomized, blinded study. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;84(2):245-8.

    PMID: 8041539BACKGROUND
  • Griffiths JD, Gyte GM, Popham PA, Williams K, Paranjothy S, Broughton HK, Brown HC, Thomas J. Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 18;5(5):CD007579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007579.pub3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NauseaVomitingPersonal Satisfaction

Interventions

Butylscopolammonium BromideScopolamine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Quaternary Ammonium CompoundsAminesOrganic ChemicalsScopolamine DerivativesTropanesAzabicyclo CompoundsAza CompoundsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingBelladonna AlkaloidsSolanaceous Alkaloids

Results Point of Contact

Title
Shaul Cohen, MD
Organization
Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School

Study Officials

  • Shaul Cohen, MD

    Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Obstetric Anesthesia

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2016

First Posted

November 9, 2016

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion

September 1, 2021

Study Completion

September 1, 2021

Last Updated

December 28, 2022

Results First Posted

December 28, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations