Scopolamine Patch and Acupressure Point P6 Stimulation for Reduction of Nausea and Vomiting During Cesarean Section
Is the Application of Scopolamine Patch With or Without Intra-operative Acupressure Point P6 Stimulation More Effective Than Intra-operative Acupressure Point P6 Stimulation Alone?
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of reducing intra-cesarean section nausea and vomiting with regional anesthesia in subjects who will receive scopolamine patch with acupressure point P6 stimulation versus subjects that receive just scopolamine patch versus subjects that receive just acupressure point P6 stimulation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started May 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 28, 2022
CompletedDecember 28, 2022
November 1, 2022
5.3 years
November 7, 2016
August 7, 2022
November 25, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Patients With Nausea
The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that experience nausea at any point during the surgical procedure in each group.
Throughout the entire surgical procedure
Number of Patients With Vomiting
The investigators will perform objective assessments of whether or not the patients have vomited during the procedure. The investigators will then analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that vomit in each group.
Throughout the surgical procedure
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Satisfaction With Intraoperative Antiemetic Treatment
Throughout the surgical procedure
Level of Nausea After the Administration of the Regional Anesthesia Medications
From administration of anaesthesia until eversion of uterus
Level of Nausea After Eversion of the Uterus
After eversion of the uterus until replacement of the uterus
Level of Nausea After Replacement of the Uterus
After replacement of the uterus and to the next 15 minutes
Level of Nausea Upon Arrival to the Post-operative Recovery Room
15 minutes after replacement of the uterus to arrival at post-anaesthesia care unit
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
scopolamine patch
EXPERIMENTALScopolamine patch will be placed on the skin behind the right ear 1 hour before initiation of the regional anesthesia for the duration of surgery.
acupressure point P6
EXPERIMENTALAcupressure point P6 stimulation will be placed on the distal right forearm just above the crest of the wrist.
scopolamine patch + acupressure point P6
EXPERIMENTALWill receive both scopolamine patch and acupressure point P6 stimulation, as described above.
Interventions
Group I (n=80): Will receive scopolamine patch placement on the skin behind the right ear 1 hour before initiation of the regional anesthesia for the duration of surgery. The time of the application of the patch will be recorded, and the time of the start of the surgery will be recorded. The last time point for evaluation of patient's nausea/vomiting will be when the patient arrives to the post anesthesia care unit. A member of the research team will remove the patch from the patient and properly dispose the patch upon arrival to the post anesthesia care unit.
Group II (n=80): Will receive acupressure point P6 stimulation. This is a stimulation of the chi channel at the master of the heart (MH8 position) at the small depression of the volar surface of the distal right forearm just above the crest of the wrist. The device will be put on the patients in the operating room prior to administration of the regional anesthesia and will be removed after the cesarean section is complete. The device will be removed from the patient in the operating room, before the patient is transported to the recovery room. Patients will receive continuous stimulation at a level that is comfortable for her prior to administration of the standardized regional anesthesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female subjects ages 18 to 45
- Subjects with ASA Class I or II
- Subjects with elective primary or repeat cesarean delivery
- Subjects who receive spinal and/or epidural anesthesia
- English and non-English speaking subjects will be included in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Female subjects \<18 years of age
- Subjects requiring emergent cesarean delivery
- Gestational age \< 37 weeks
- History of placenta accreta
- Multiple gestation pregnancy
- ASA status III or higher
- Current history of pregnancy induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or eclampsia
- History of any chronic medication use (other than prenatal vitamins), including inhaler medications
- Current urinary tract infection, pneumonia, or otitis media
- Coagulopathies or skin infections overlying the spine
- History of open angle glaucoma, seizures or psychosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States
Related Publications (16)
Hawkins JL, Koonin LM, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979-1990. Anesthesiology. 1997 Feb;86(2):277-84. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199702000-00002.
PMID: 9054245BACKGROUNDEzri T, Szmuk P, Evron S, Geva D, Hagay Z, Katz J. Difficult airway in obstetric anesthesia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001 Oct;56(10):631-41. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200110000-00022.
PMID: 11590314BACKGROUNDMalvasi A, Tinelli A, Stark M, Pontrelli G, Brizzi A, Wetzl RG, Benhamou D. Low-dose sequential combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia in elective Stark caesarean section: a preliminary cohort study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010 Mar;14(3):215-21.
PMID: 20391961BACKGROUNDAfolabi BB, Lesi FE. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004350. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3.
PMID: 23076903BACKGROUNDRiley ET, Cohen SE, Macario A, Desai JB, Ratner EF. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of time efficiency, costs, charges, and complications. Anesth Analg. 1995 Apr;80(4):709-12. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199504000-00010.
PMID: 7893022BACKGROUNDBalki M, Carvalho JC. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean section under regional anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Jul;14(3):230-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.004.
PMID: 15935649BACKGROUNDParanjothy S, Griffiths JD, Broughton HK, Gyte GM, Brown HC, Thomas J. Interventions at caesarean section for reducing the risk of aspiration pneumonitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 5;2014(2):CD004943. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004943.pub4.
PMID: 24497372BACKGROUNDFlake ZA, Linn BS, Hornecker JR. Practical selection of antiemetics in the ambulatory setting. Am Fam Physician. 2015 Mar 1;91(5):293-6.
PMID: 25822385BACKGROUNDGolembiewski J, Chernin E, Chopra T. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Jun 15;62(12):1247-60; quiz 1261-2. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/62.12.1247.
PMID: 15947124BACKGROUNDApfel CC, Zhang K, George E, Shi S, Jalota L, Hornuss C, Fero KE, Heidrich F, Pergolizzi JV, Cakmakkaya OS, Kranke P. Transdermal scopolamine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2010 Nov;32(12):1987-2002. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.11.014.
PMID: 21118734BACKGROUNDRenner UD, Oertel R, Kirch W. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in clinical use of scopolamine. Ther Drug Monit. 2005 Oct;27(5):655-65. doi: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000168293.48226.57.
PMID: 16175141BACKGROUNDLee A, Fan LT. Stimulation of the wrist acupuncture point P6 for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003281.pub3.
PMID: 19370583BACKGROUNDAllen TK, Habib AS. P6 stimulation for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2008 Oct;107(4):1308-12. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1864.
PMID: 18806045BACKGROUNDQuinla JD, Hill DA. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Jul 1;68(1):121-8.
PMID: 12887118BACKGROUNDBelluomini J, Litt RC, Lee KA, Katz M. Acupressure for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a randomized, blinded study. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;84(2):245-8.
PMID: 8041539BACKGROUNDGriffiths JD, Gyte GM, Popham PA, Williams K, Paranjothy S, Broughton HK, Brown HC, Thomas J. Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 18;5(5):CD007579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007579.pub3.
PMID: 34002866DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Shaul Cohen, MD
- Organization
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shaul Cohen, MD
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Obstetric Anesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2016
First Posted
November 9, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 1, 2021
Study Completion
September 1, 2021
Last Updated
December 28, 2022
Results First Posted
December 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share