Misoprostol 400 µg Versus 200 µg for Cervical Ripening in 1st Trimester Miscarriage
MISO200
Comparison Between 400 µg or 200 µg of Misoprostol for Cervical Dilatation in 1st Trimester Miscarriage - A Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
211
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Local current protocol for cervical ripening in 1st trimester miscarriage recommends 400 µg of misoprostol intravaginally 3 hours before uterine evacuation. This regime has been recommended by some international guidelines . So far, there are no recent studies comparing cervical dilatation between 400 µg of misoprostol and a reduced dose (e.g., 200 µg) for 6 hours. If cervical ripening is similar between these two regimens(i.e., 200µg regimen is not inferior to 400µg regimen), costs reductions and lower side effects may be issued without losing quality of cervix dilatation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Dec 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 21, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 19, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 3, 2020
CompletedApril 30, 2021
April 1, 2021
2.8 years
November 4, 2016
July 9, 2020
April 29, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Who Required Cervix Dilation at Initiation of the Manual Vacuum Aspiration
this outcome identifies patients that had to have a mechanical dilator for opening the cervix to perform appropriate Manual Vacuum Aspiration
baseline at initiation of the Manual Vacuum Aspiration
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With a Presence of a Uterine Cervical Canal With ≥8 mm of Dilation
Baseline before Manual Vacuum Aspiration procedure
Other Outcomes (1)
Pain Score (VAS)
before Manual Vacuum Aspiration
Study Arms (2)
Misoprostol 400 µg
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received misoprostol 400 µg: 2 tablets of misoprostol (200µg each) introduced into the vagina, at least 6 hours before the Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) procedure.
Misoprostol 200 µg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received misoprostol 200 µg: 1 tablet of misoprostol introduced into the vagina, at least 6 hours before the Manual Vacuum Aspiration procedure.
Interventions
400µg of misoprostol (2 tablets)
200µg of misoprostol (1 tablet)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients admitted at the Gynecological emergency Unit at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre scheduled for uterine evacuation with \<12 weeks of gestation.
You may not qualify if:
- patients who do not wish to participate in the project;
- patients with ectopic pregnancy;
- patients with comorbidities (heart failure congestive, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease);
- patients with hypovolemic shock;
- patients with cervical incompetence;
- patients with infected miscarriage/abortion (presence of fever, pus from the cervix, leukocytosis \[\> 14000\]);
- patients with twin pregnancy;
- patients with Marfan syndrome;
- patients allergic to misoprostol;
- patients with coagulopathy;
- patients with opening of cervical internal os (4 mm of dilatation at the time of consultation);
- patients with previous surgery of the cervix (conization);
- patients with concomitant use of IUDs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
HCPA
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903, Brazil
Related Publications (6)
Kapp N, Lohr PA, Ngo TD, Hayes JL. Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;2010(2):CD007207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007207.pub2.
PMID: 20166091BACKGROUNDBlanchard K, Clark S, Winikoff B, Gaines G, Kabani G, Shannon C. Misoprostol for women's health: a review. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):316-32. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01701-x.
PMID: 11814515BACKGROUNDMarret H, Simon E, Beucher G, Dreyfus M, Gaudineau A, Vayssiere C, Lesavre M, Pluchon M, Winer N, Fernandez H, Aubert J, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Jonville-Bera AP, Clouqueur E, Houfflin-Debarge V, Garrigue A, Pierre F; College national des gynecologues obstetriciens francais. Overview and expert assessment of off-label use of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynaecology: review and report by the College national des gynecologues obstetriciens francais. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Apr;187:80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
PMID: 25701235BACKGROUNDNational Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK). Ectopic Pregnancy and Miscarriage: Diagnosis and Initial Management in Early Pregnancy of Ectopic Pregnancy and Miscarriage. London: RCOG Press; 2012 Dec. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK132775/
PMID: 23638497BACKGROUNDACOG Committee Opinion. American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologist. ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 283, May 2003. New U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling on Cytotec (misoprostol) use and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;101(5 Pt 1):1049-50. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00396-x.
PMID: 12738178BACKGROUNDTang J, Kapp N, Dragoman M, de Souza JP. WHO recommendations for misoprostol use for obstetric and gynecologic indications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 May;121(2):186-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
PMID: 23433680BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable. Pregnancies with less than 8 weeks had their procedures completely done with small diameter Karman cannulas
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ricardo Francalacci Savaris
- Organization
- Dep. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre - RS - Brazil
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ricardo F Ricardo, MD, PhD
HCPA
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Patients, operators and statistical analysis were performed blindly.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of the Gynecologic Emergency Unit
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2016
First Posted
November 7, 2016
Study Start
December 21, 2016
Primary Completion
October 19, 2019
Study Completion
June 30, 2020
Last Updated
April 30, 2021
Results First Posted
September 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- unlimited
- Access Criteria
- free to read
We intend to share raw data with other researchers