NCT02947776

Brief Summary

Aims: This exploratory trial will:

  1. 1.Explore the feasibility of a definitive/phase III RCT on clinical and cost-effectiveness of peer-befriending for people with aphasia post-stroke.
  2. 2.Investigate psychological and social wellbeing outcomes of participants, significant others, and peer befrienders.
  3. 3.Explore the feasibility of a full economic evaluation of usual care + peer befriending versus usual care control.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
62

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 13, 2016

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 28, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 25, 2017

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 20, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 20, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 22, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

October 13, 2016

Last Update Submit

July 21, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) continuous total score

    For participants with aphasia.

    4 months post randomisation

  • Depression Intensity Scale Circles (DISCS) continuous total score

    The DISCS will be treated as the primary outcome measure only if there is ≥10% missing data in the GHQ-12 due to severity of aphasia, otherwise it will be a secondary outcome measure.

    4 months post randomisation

  • General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) continuous total score

    For participants with aphasia.

    10 months post randomisation

  • Depression Intensity Scale Circles (DISCS) continuous total score

    The DISCS will be treated as the primary outcome measure only if there is ≥10% missing data in the GHQ-12 due to severity of aphasia, otherwise it will be a secondary outcome measure.

    10 months post randomisation

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) continuous total score.

    4 months post randomisation

  • Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) continuous total score.

    10 months post randomisation

  • Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) continuous total score

    4 months post randomisation

  • Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) continuous total score

    10 months post randomisation

  • Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) continuous total score

    4 months post randomisation

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (8)

  • Communication Confidence Rating Scale for people with aphasia (CCRSA)

    4 months post randomisation

  • Communication Confidence Rating Scale for people with aphasia (CCRSA)

    10 months post randomisation

  • Friendship Scale (FS)

    4 months post randomisation

  • +5 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

USUAL

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Usual care

Behavioral: USUAL

PEER

EXPERIMENTAL

Usual care + peer-befriending

Behavioral: PEERBehavioral: USUAL

Interventions

PEERBEHAVIORAL

The experimental group will receive usual care + peer befriending. Peer befriending aims to utilise the skills and 'lived experience' of people with longer-term aphasia to offer support to others with aphasia, starting at a time of transition (discharge from hospital and withdrawal of intensive therapeutic input) and increased need. It aims to help people develop their own strategies for adjusting to life post-stroke. Peer-befrienders will visit participants 6 times over a period of 3 months (+2 times within the next 6 months). The schedule, nature of visits, and goals (e.g. discuss concerns; pursue activities) will be agreed between the pair. Visits may include: conversation, problem solving, trips out, joint activities.

PEER
USUALBEHAVIORAL

The control group will receive usual care, i.e. all health, social care and voluntary services available to them in their borough. It is not known what exactly usual care comprises for people with aphasia who are discharged in the community with low levels of psychological problems, and this project will help to document this.

PEERUSUAL

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants with aphasia:
  • Over 18;
  • Fluent premorbid users of English (confirmed by relative or self report);
  • Presence of aphasia due to stroke; and
  • Low levels of emotional distress (score of ≤2 on Depression Intensity Scale Circles). The latter will ensure that they do not require immediate level 2 or 3 psychological input. People who score 2 (which is also the median on DISCS) and who the MDT deems do not need stepping up or stepping up is not available, will still be eligible to take part.
  • Significant Others: each participant with aphasia will nominate one significant other, who is their closest confidant and who is over 18 years of age. If participants live alone their significant other should be someone that they see at least once a week.
  • Peer befrienders: will be people with mild-moderate aphasia (score score a minimum 5/10 for auditory comprehension and 5/10 for verbal expression in the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test) who are over 18 years of age, are at least one year post-stroke

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants will be excluded if they have:
  • Other diagnoses affecting cognition or mental health (based on medical records for participants with aphasia and self-report for significant others and peer befrienders, as well as the GHQ-12 as a depression screen for peer befrienders: will be excluded if they score 3 or more);
  • Severe uncorrected visual or hearing problems (based on medical records for participants with aphasia and self-report for significant others and peer befrienders);
  • Severe or potentially terminal co-morbidities, on grounds of frailty (based on medical records for participants with aphasia and self-report for significant others and peer befrienders).
  • Participants with aphasia will also be excluded if they are:
  • Discharged to a geographical location outside the borough of the recruiting hospital.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

The Royal London Hospital

London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom

Location

Homerton University Hospital

London, E9 6SR, United Kingdom

Location

University College London Hospital

London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom

Location

The Royal Free Hospital

London, NW3 2QG, United Kingdom

Location

The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery

London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Hilari K, Behn N, Marshall J, Simpson A, Thomas S, Northcott S, Flood C, McVicker S, Jofre-Bonet M, Moss B, James K, Goldsmith K. Adjustment with aphasia after stroke: study protocol for a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial for SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR Befriending (SUPERB). Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Jan 22;5:14. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0397-6. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 30693094BACKGROUND
  • Behn N, Moss B, McVicker S, Roper A, Northcott S, Marshall J, Thomas S, Simpson A, Flood C, James K, Goldsmith K, Hilari K. SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 2;11(8):e047994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047994.

  • Moss B, Behn N, Northcott S, Monnelly K, Marshall J, Simpson A, Thomas S, McVicker S, Goldsmith K, Flood C, Hilari K. "Loneliness can also kill:" a qualitative exploration of outcomes and experiences of the SUPERB peer-befriending scheme for people with aphasia and their significant others. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(18):5015-5024. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1922519. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

  • Northcott S, Behn N, Monnelly K, Moss B, Marshall J, Thomas S, Simpson A, McVicker S, Flood C, Goldsmith K, Hilari K. "For them and for me": a qualitative exploration of peer befrienders' experiences supporting people with aphasia in the SUPERB feasibility trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(18):5025-5037. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1922520. Epub 2021 May 23.

  • Hilari K, Behn N, James K, Northcott S, Marshall J, Thomas S, Simpson A, Moss B, Flood C, McVicker S, Goldsmith K. Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2021 Aug;35(8):1151-1163. doi: 10.1177/0269215521995671. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeAphasia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesSpeech DisordersLanguage DisordersCommunication DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Katerina Hilari

    City, University of London

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2016

First Posted

October 28, 2016

Study Start

May 25, 2017

Primary Completion

August 20, 2019

Study Completion

August 20, 2019

Last Updated

July 22, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Anonymised data may be shared e.g. for meta-analyses

Locations