Adjustment With Aphasia After Stroke: SUPERB
SUPERB
Adjustment Post Stroke and Aphasia: Supporting Psychological Wellbeing Through Peer Befriending
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Aims: This exploratory trial will:
- 1.Explore the feasibility of a definitive/phase III RCT on clinical and cost-effectiveness of peer-befriending for people with aphasia post-stroke.
- 2.Investigate psychological and social wellbeing outcomes of participants, significant others, and peer befrienders.
- 3.Explore the feasibility of a full economic evaluation of usual care + peer befriending versus usual care control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started May 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 25, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 20, 2019
CompletedJuly 22, 2020
January 1, 2020
2.2 years
October 13, 2016
July 21, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) continuous total score
For participants with aphasia.
4 months post randomisation
Depression Intensity Scale Circles (DISCS) continuous total score
The DISCS will be treated as the primary outcome measure only if there is ≥10% missing data in the GHQ-12 due to severity of aphasia, otherwise it will be a secondary outcome measure.
4 months post randomisation
General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) continuous total score
For participants with aphasia.
10 months post randomisation
Depression Intensity Scale Circles (DISCS) continuous total score
The DISCS will be treated as the primary outcome measure only if there is ≥10% missing data in the GHQ-12 due to severity of aphasia, otherwise it will be a secondary outcome measure.
10 months post randomisation
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) continuous total score.
4 months post randomisation
Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) continuous total score.
10 months post randomisation
Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) continuous total score
4 months post randomisation
Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) continuous total score
10 months post randomisation
Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) continuous total score
4 months post randomisation
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (8)
Communication Confidence Rating Scale for people with aphasia (CCRSA)
4 months post randomisation
Communication Confidence Rating Scale for people with aphasia (CCRSA)
10 months post randomisation
Friendship Scale (FS)
4 months post randomisation
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
USUAL
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual care
PEER
EXPERIMENTALUsual care + peer-befriending
Interventions
The experimental group will receive usual care + peer befriending. Peer befriending aims to utilise the skills and 'lived experience' of people with longer-term aphasia to offer support to others with aphasia, starting at a time of transition (discharge from hospital and withdrawal of intensive therapeutic input) and increased need. It aims to help people develop their own strategies for adjusting to life post-stroke. Peer-befrienders will visit participants 6 times over a period of 3 months (+2 times within the next 6 months). The schedule, nature of visits, and goals (e.g. discuss concerns; pursue activities) will be agreed between the pair. Visits may include: conversation, problem solving, trips out, joint activities.
The control group will receive usual care, i.e. all health, social care and voluntary services available to them in their borough. It is not known what exactly usual care comprises for people with aphasia who are discharged in the community with low levels of psychological problems, and this project will help to document this.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants with aphasia:
- Over 18;
- Fluent premorbid users of English (confirmed by relative or self report);
- Presence of aphasia due to stroke; and
- Low levels of emotional distress (score of ≤2 on Depression Intensity Scale Circles). The latter will ensure that they do not require immediate level 2 or 3 psychological input. People who score 2 (which is also the median on DISCS) and who the MDT deems do not need stepping up or stepping up is not available, will still be eligible to take part.
- Significant Others: each participant with aphasia will nominate one significant other, who is their closest confidant and who is over 18 years of age. If participants live alone their significant other should be someone that they see at least once a week.
- Peer befrienders: will be people with mild-moderate aphasia (score score a minimum 5/10 for auditory comprehension and 5/10 for verbal expression in the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test) who are over 18 years of age, are at least one year post-stroke
You may not qualify if:
- Participants will be excluded if they have:
- Other diagnoses affecting cognition or mental health (based on medical records for participants with aphasia and self-report for significant others and peer befrienders, as well as the GHQ-12 as a depression screen for peer befrienders: will be excluded if they score 3 or more);
- Severe uncorrected visual or hearing problems (based on medical records for participants with aphasia and self-report for significant others and peer befrienders);
- Severe or potentially terminal co-morbidities, on grounds of frailty (based on medical records for participants with aphasia and self-report for significant others and peer befrienders).
- Participants with aphasia will also be excluded if they are:
- Discharged to a geographical location outside the borough of the recruiting hospital.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
The Royal London Hospital
London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom
Homerton University Hospital
London, E9 6SR, United Kingdom
University College London Hospital
London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
The Royal Free Hospital
London, NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery
London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
Related Publications (5)
Hilari K, Behn N, Marshall J, Simpson A, Thomas S, Northcott S, Flood C, McVicker S, Jofre-Bonet M, Moss B, James K, Goldsmith K. Adjustment with aphasia after stroke: study protocol for a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial for SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR Befriending (SUPERB). Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Jan 22;5:14. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0397-6. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 30693094BACKGROUNDBehn N, Moss B, McVicker S, Roper A, Northcott S, Marshall J, Thomas S, Simpson A, Flood C, James K, Goldsmith K, Hilari K. SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 2;11(8):e047994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047994.
PMID: 34341046DERIVEDMoss B, Behn N, Northcott S, Monnelly K, Marshall J, Simpson A, Thomas S, McVicker S, Goldsmith K, Flood C, Hilari K. "Loneliness can also kill:" a qualitative exploration of outcomes and experiences of the SUPERB peer-befriending scheme for people with aphasia and their significant others. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(18):5015-5024. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1922519. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
PMID: 34086521DERIVEDNorthcott S, Behn N, Monnelly K, Moss B, Marshall J, Thomas S, Simpson A, McVicker S, Flood C, Goldsmith K, Hilari K. "For them and for me": a qualitative exploration of peer befrienders' experiences supporting people with aphasia in the SUPERB feasibility trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(18):5025-5037. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1922520. Epub 2021 May 23.
PMID: 34027757DERIVEDHilari K, Behn N, James K, Northcott S, Marshall J, Thomas S, Simpson A, Moss B, Flood C, McVicker S, Goldsmith K. Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2021 Aug;35(8):1151-1163. doi: 10.1177/0269215521995671. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
PMID: 33624514DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Katerina Hilari
City, University of London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 13, 2016
First Posted
October 28, 2016
Study Start
May 25, 2017
Primary Completion
August 20, 2019
Study Completion
August 20, 2019
Last Updated
July 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Anonymised data may be shared e.g. for meta-analyses