Choir Singing in Aphasia Rehabilitation
Efficacy of Choir Singing on Verbal, Cognitive, Emotional, and Neural Recovery From Aphasia
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the verbal, cognitive, emotional, and neural efficacy of a choir singing intervention in chronic aphasic patients and their caregivers. Using a cross-over RCT design, half of the participants receive a 4-month singing intervention during the first half of the study and half of the participants during the second half of the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke
Started Jan 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2020
CompletedAugust 18, 2022
August 1, 2022
2.1 years
February 16, 2018
August 17, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Communication ability
Total score of the Communication Action Log (CAL) questionnaire (range 0-180, higher score indicates better outcome)
Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months
Spontaneous speech production
Spontaneous Speech subscale score of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) (range 0-20, higher score indicates better outcome)
Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months
Connected speech informativeness
Percentage of correct information units (CIUs) produced in a picture description task
Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months
Repetition of words and sentences
Repetition subscale score of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) (range 0-100, higher score indicates better outcome)
Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months
Verbal agility
Verbal Agility subtest score of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examinaton (BDAE) (range 0-14, higher score indicates better outcome)
Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months
Naming and word finding
Naming and Word Finding subscale score of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) (range 0-100, higher score indicates better outcome)
Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months
Verbal comprehension
Sequential Commands subtest score of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) (range 0-80, higher score indicates better outcome)
Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Executive function (correct responses)
Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months
Executive function (reaction times)
Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months
Attention (correct responses)
Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months
Attention (reaction times)
Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months
Working memory
Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Early singing intervention (AB)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive a 16 weeks of singing-based rehabilitation and standard care (SC) followed by 16 weeks of SC only.
Late singing intervention (BA)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive a 16 weeks of SC only followed by 16 weeks of singing intervention and SC.
Interventions
The singing-based rehabilitation is a combination of group-training (16 weeks, 1 x week, 90 min), which utilizes a novel combination of traditional senior choir singing and singing-based speech training protocols, and home training (16 weeks, ≥ 3 x week, ≥ 30 min) in which the choir material is trained with a tablet computer.
Standard care comprises all rehabilitation and care services (e.g. speech therapy, physical and occupational therapy, neuropsychological rehabilitation) received by the patients in the Finnish health care system
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age over 18
- Finnish-speaking
- time since stroke \> 6 months
- at least minor non-fluent aphasia due to stroke (BDAE Aphasia Severity Rating scale score ≤ 4)
- no hearing deficit
- no severe cognitive impairment affecting comprehension (the patient is able to understand the purpose of the study and give an informed consent)
- no neurological / psychiatric co-morbidity or substance abuse
- ability to produce vocal sound (through singing or humming).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Helsinkilead
- Helsinki University Central Hospitalcollaborator
- Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaacollaborator
- Helsinki-Uusimaa Aphasia and Stroke Associationcollaborator
- Finnish Brain Associationcollaborator
- Outloud Ltdcollaborator
- University of Barcelonacollaborator
- University of Melbournecollaborator
- Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Helsinki University Central Hospital, Department of Neurology, Rehabilitation Unit
Helsinki, Finland
Helsinki-Uusimaa Aphasia and Stroke Association
Helsinki, Finland
Related Publications (2)
Martinez-Molina N, Pitkaniemi A, Siponkoski ST, Moisseinen N, Kuusela L, Laitinen S, Sarkamo ER, Pekkola J, Melkas S, Schlaug G, Kleber B, Sihvonen AJ, Sarkamo T. Functional neuroplasticity in chronic post-stroke aphasia following a singing intervention in a cross-over randomised trial. Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11288-0.
PMID: 40738917DERIVEDSiponkoski ST, Pitkaniemi A, Laitinen S, Sarkamo ER, Pentikainen E, Eloranta H, Tuomiranta L, Melkas S, Schlaug G, Sihvonen AJ, Sarkamo T. Efficacy of a multicomponent singing intervention on communication and psychosocial functioning in chronic aphasia: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Brain Commun. 2022 Dec 27;5(1):fcac337. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac337. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 36687394DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Teppo Särkämö, PhD
University of Helsinki
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Academy of Finland Research Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2018
First Posted
April 18, 2018
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion
January 31, 2020
Study Completion
March 15, 2020
Last Updated
August 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share