Ultrasound-guided Versus Blind Technique in Medial Brachial Cutaneous Nerve and Intercostobrachial Nerve Blocks
ECHO_NCMB
The Effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided Technique Compared to Blind Technique in Medial Brachial Cutaneous Nerve Block and Intercostobrachial Nerve Block, in the Axilla
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The axillary brachial plexus block is a technique of locoregional anesthesia indicated in the distal upper limb surgery : hand, forearm, the lower third of the arm including the elbow. The anesthesia of the posterior and the medial side of the arm requires a selective block of the medial brachial cutaneous nerve and the intercostobrachial nerve, for example to improve the tolerance of the inflatable tourniquet used by the surgeons. There are two techniques to achieve this block : the blind technique (without ultrasound) and the ultrasound-guided technique. At the moment, there are no studies which compare these two techniques. So, the purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided technique compared to blind technique in medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and intercostobrachial nerve block, in the axilla.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 13, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedJuly 28, 2017
July 1, 2017
2 months
October 16, 2016
July 27, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Number of participants with complete anesthesia in the lower half of the medial cutaneous area of the arm, at time 20 minutes
At time 20 minutes after the achievement of medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and intercostobrachial nerve block, a light touch sensitivity test is performed
at time 20 minutes after the achievement of medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and intercostobrachial nerve block
Number of participants with complete anesthesia in the upper half of the medial cutaneous area of the arm, at time 20 minutes
At time 20 minutes after the achievement of medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and intercostobrachial nerve block, a light touch sensitivity test is performed
at time 20 minutes after the achievement of medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and intercostobrachial nerve block
Number of participants with complete anesthesia in the lower half of the posterior cutaneous area of the arm, at time 20 minutes
At time 20 minutes after the achievement of medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and intercostobrachial nerve block, a light touch sensitivity test is performed
at time 20 minutes after the achievement of medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and intercostobrachial nerve block
Number of participants with complete anesthesia in the upper half of the posterior cutaneous area of the arm, at time 20 minutes
At time 20 minutes after the achievement of medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and intercostobrachial nerve block, a light touch sensitivity test is performed
at time 20 minutes after the achievement of medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and intercostobrachial nerve block
Number of participants with complete anesthesia of the arm at time 20 minutes
At time 20 minutes after the achievement of medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and intercostobrachial nerve block, a light touch sensitivity test is performed
at time 20 minutes after the achievement of medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and intercostobrachial nerve block
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Number of participants with complete anesthesia, with reduced sensitivity and with absence of anesthesia at times 5, 10, 15, 20 minutes (except primary outcome) in the areas of the medial brachial cutaneous nerve and the intercostobrachial nerve
at times 5, 10, 15, 20 minutes after the achievement of the medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and the intercostobrachial nerve block
Number of patients with comfortable feeling, with unpleasant sensations and with pains during surgery, in the areas of the medial brachial cutaneous nerve and the intercostobrachial nerve (questionnaire completed by the anesthesist)
3 hours after the achievement of the medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and the intercostobrachial nerve block
The total volume (mL) of local anesthetic used for the medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and the intercostobrachial nerve block
5 minutes after the achievement of the medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and the intercostobrachial nerve block
Number of participants (of the ultrasound-guided group) with good ultrasound view of theses nerves before and after the injection of the local anesthetic
5 minutes after the achievement of the medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and the intercostobrachial nerve block
Number of participants (of the ultrasound-guided group) with : bad ultrasound view of theses nerves before the injection and good ultrasound view of theses nerves after the injection of the local anesthetic
5 minutes after the achievement of the medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and the intercostobrachial nerve block
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
blind technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORInvestigators will perform a medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and an intercostobrachial nerve block with either a blind technique or an ultrasound-guided technique to estimate the effectiveness of each technique. The blind technique consists in performing a subcutaneous injection of the local anesthetic at the root of the arm, in the anterior-posterior direction.
ultrasound-guided technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORInvestigators will perform a medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and an intercostobrachial nerve block with either a blind technique or an ultrasound-guided technique to estimate the effectiveness of each technique. In the ultrasound-guided technique, ultrasounds are used to visualize the anatomical variations, the good position of the needle and the good local anesthetic diffusion.
Interventions
It consists in performing a subcutaneous injection of the local anesthetic at the root of the arm, in the anterior-posterior direction.
Ultrasounds are used to visualize the anatomical variations, the good position of the needle and the good local anesthetic diffusion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients ≥ 18 years
- Surgery of the distal upper limb : hand, forearm, lower third of the arm ,including the elbow
- Urgent or planned surgery
- Locoregional anesthesia : axillary brachial plexus block, completed by a medial brachial cutaneous nerve block and an intercostobrachial nerve block
- Local anesthetic used : mepivacaine 10mg/ml
- In the absence of patient objections
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Adults under guardianship
- Locoregional anesthesia contraindications
- Local anesthetic used : ropivacaine 0,75%
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chru Nancy
Nancy, 54035, France
Related Publications (1)
Magazzeni P, Jochum D, Iohom G, Mekler G, Albuisson E, Bouaziz H. Ultrasound-Guided Selective Versus Conventional Block of the Medial Brachial Cutaneous and the Intercostobrachial Nerves: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):832-837. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000823.
PMID: 29905631DERIVED
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hervé BOUAZIZ, Professor
CHU NANCY
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2016
First Posted
October 21, 2016
Study Start
November 13, 2016
Primary Completion
January 26, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
July 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share